Developing an optimised method for accurate wear testing of dental materials using the 'Rub&Roll' device.
Abrasion
Dental materials
Erosion
Laboratory test method
Resin-based composites
Wear
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Aug 2024
02 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
11
04
2024
accepted:
29
07
2024
medline:
3
8
2024
pubmed:
3
8
2024
entrez:
2
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dental materials are challenged by wear processes in the oral environment and should be evaluated in laboratory tests prior to clinical use. Many laboratory wear-testing devices are high-cost investments and not available for cross-centre comparisons. The 'Rub&Roll' wear machine enables controlled application of force, chemical and mechanical loading, but the initial design was not able to test against rigid antagonist materials. The current study aimed to probe the sensitivity of a new 'Rub&Roll' set-up by evaluating the effect of force and test solution parameters (deionized water; water + abrasive medium; acid + abrasive medium) on the wear behaviour of direct and indirect dental resin-based composites (RBCs) compared with human molars against 3D-printed rod antagonists. Molars exhibited greater height loss than RBCs in all test groups, with the largest differences recorded with acidic solutions. Direct RBCs showed significantly greater wear than indirect RBCs in the groups containing abrasive media. The acidic + abrasive medium did not result in increased wear of RBC materials. The developed method using the 'Rub&Roll' wear machine in the current investigation has provided a sensitive wear test method to allow initial screening of resin-based composite materials compared with extracted human molars under the influence of different mechanical and erosive challenges.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39095406
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68873-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-68873-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Composite Resins
0
Dental Materials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17885Subventions
Organisme : Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) at the University Hospital of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
ID : Junior Project J103
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Ning, K. et al. Wear behaviour of direct composite restorations in tooth wear patients: A 5 year clinical study. J. Dent. 127, 104354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104354 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104354
pubmed: 36351488
Burian, G. et al. In-vivo-wear in composite and ceramic full mouth rehabilitations over 3 years. Sci. Rep. 11, 14056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93425-z (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93425-z
pubmed: 34234225
pmcid: 8263767
Ferracane, J. L. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices?. Dent. Mater. 22, 689–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.005 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.005
pubmed: 16563492
Kramer, N. et al. Marginal quality and wear of extended posterior resin composite restorations: Eight-year results in vivo. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 50, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.018 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.018
pubmed: 26091568
Tsujimoto, A. et al. Wear of resin composites: Current insights into underlying mechanisms, evaluation methods and influential factors. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 54, 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2017.11.002 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2017.11.002
pubmed: 29755618
Demarco, F. F. et al. Longevity of composite restorations is definitely not only about materials. Dent. Mater. 39, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.11.009 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.11.009
pubmed: 36494241
Heintze, S. D., Loguercio, A. D., Hanzen, T. A., Reis, A. & Rousson, V. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations—An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters. Dent. Mater. 38, e109–e135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.018 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.018
pubmed: 35221127
Alvanforoush, N., Palamara, J., Wong, R. H. & Burrow, M. F. Comparison between published clinical success of direct resin composite restorations in vital posterior teeth in 1995–2005 and 2006–2016 periods. Aust. Dent. J. 62, 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12487 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/adj.12487
pubmed: 27861960
Hickel, R. et al. Revised FDI criteria for evaluating direct and indirect dental restorations-recommendations for its clinical use, interpretation, and reporting. Clin. Oral Investig. 27, 2573–2592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04814-1 (2023).
doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04814-1
pubmed: 36504246
Lambrechts, P., Debels, E., Van Landuyt, K., Peumans, M. & Van Meerbeek, B. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dent. Mater. 22, 693–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.004 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.004
pubmed: 16712913
DeLong, R. & Douglas, W. H. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: Bi-axial force and movement control. J. Dent. Res. 62, 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620010801 (1983).
doi: 10.1177/00220345830620010801
pubmed: 6571851
Condon, J. R. & Ferracane, J. L. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent. Mater. 12, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80026-1 (1996).
doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80026-1
pubmed: 9002838
Rosentritt, M. et al. Regensburger kausimulator: Apparatur zur simulation des kauorgans. Mater. Test. 39, 77–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-1997-390309 (1997).
doi: 10.1515/mt-1997-390309
Yap, A. U., Ong, L. F., Teoh, S. H. & Hastings, G. W. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator. J. Oral Rehabil. 26, 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00359.x (1999).
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00359.x
pubmed: 10194732
Alemzadeh, K. & Raabe, D. Prototyping artificial jaws for the bristol dento-munch robo-simulator. A parallel robot to test dental components and materials. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2007, 1453–1456 (2007).
pubmed: 18002240
Heintze, S. D., Reichl, F. X. & Hickel, R. Wear of dental materials: Clinical significance and laboratory wear simulation methods—A review. Dent. Mater. J. 38, 343–353. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-140 (2019).
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-140
pubmed: 30918233
Ruben, J. L., Roeters, F. J. M., Montagner, A. F. & Huysmans, M. C. D. N. J. M. A multifunctional device to simulate oral ageing: The “Rub&Roll”. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 30, 75–82 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.10.019
pubmed: 24262207
Ruben, J. L., Truin, G.-J., Loomans, B. A. C. & Huysmans, M.-C.D.N.J.M. Mimicking and measuring occlusal erosive tooth wear with the “Rub&Roll” and non-contact profilometry. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/56400 (2018).
doi: 10.3791/56400
pubmed: 29443085
pmcid: 5912331
Maier, E. et al. Evaluation of wear behavior of dental restorative materials against zirconia in vitro. Dent. Mater. 38, 778–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.04.016 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.04.016
pubmed: 35459553
Maas, M. C. & Dumont, E. R. Built to last: The structure, function, and evolution of primate dental enamel. Evol. Anthropol. 8, 133–152 (1999).
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1999)8:4<133::AID-EVAN4>3.0.CO;2-F
Amini, S. & Miserez, A. Wear and abrasion resistance selection maps of biological materials. Acta Biomater. 9, 7895–7907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.042 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.042
pubmed: 23643608
Kinney, J. H., Marshall, S. J. & Marshall, G. W. The mechanical properties of human dentin: A critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 14, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130301400103 (2003).
doi: 10.1177/154411130301400103
pubmed: 12764017
Ilie, N. Comparison of modern light-curing hybrid resin-based composites to the tooth structure: Static and dynamic mechanical parameters. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 110, 2121–2132. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35066 (2022).
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35066
pubmed: 35373907
Bayne, S. C. Correlation of clinical performance with ‘in vitro tests’ of restorative dental materials that use polymer-based matrices. Dent. Mater. 28, 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.594 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.594
pubmed: 22192251
Delgado, A., Dias Ribeiro, A. P., Aslam, M., Olafsson, V. G. & Pereira, P. N. Erosive assessment of dry mouth lozenges and tablets on enamel and dentin. J. Dent. 105, 103496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103496 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103496
pubmed: 33310065
Prakki, A., Cilli, R., Mondelli, R. F. L., Kalachandra, S. & Pereira, J. C. Influence of pH environment on polymer based dental material properties. J. Dent. 33, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.08.004 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.08.004
pubmed: 15683889
Owheruo, J. O., Ifesan, B. O. T. & Kolawole, A. O. Physicochemical properties of malted finger millet (Eleusine coracana) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Food Sci. Nutr. 7, 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.816 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/fsn3.816
pubmed: 30847125
Mainjot, A. K., Dupont, N. M., Oudkerk, J. C., Dewael, T. Y. & Sadoun, M. J. From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks: State of the art of indirect composites. J. Dent. Res. 95, 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516634286 (2016).
doi: 10.1177/0022034516634286
pubmed: 26933136
Hardy, C., Dive, D., Leloup, G., Leprince, J. & Randolf, L. Understanding the effect of thermal treatment on the physico–mechanical properties of light-cured composites for use in indirect restorations. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 29, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2143Hardy11 (2021).
doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2143Hardy11
pubmed: 33026723
Ghazal, M., Albashaireh, Z. S. & Kern, M. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent. 100, 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(08)60262-0 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(08)60262-0
pubmed: 19033028
Wendler, M., Kaizer, M. R., Belli, R., Lohbauer, U. & Zhang, Y. Sliding contact wear and subsurface damage of CAD/CAM materials against zirconia. Dent. Mater. 36, 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.015 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.015
pubmed: 32007314
pmcid: 7042091
Brosh, T., Zary, R., Pilo, R. & Gavish, A. Influence of periodontal ligament simulation and splints on strains developing at the cervical area of a tooth crown. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 120, 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00990.x (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00990.x
pubmed: 22985006
Bronkhorst, H. et al. Precision of in vivo quantitative tooth wear measurement using intra-oral scans. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/63680 (2022).
doi: 10.3791/63680
pubmed: 35913137
Lohbauer, U. & Reich, S. Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years. Clin. Oral Investig. 21, 1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1872-6 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1872-6
pubmed: 27277661
O’Toole, S. et al. Influence of scanner precision and analysis software in quantifying three-dimensional intraoral changes: Two-factor factorial experimental design. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e17150. https://doi.org/10.2196/17150 (2020).
doi: 10.2196/17150
pubmed: 33245280
pmcid: 7732705
Crins, L. et al. Prospective study on CAD/CAM nano-ceramic (composite) restorations in the treatment of severe tooth wear. J. Adhes. Dent. 24, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2838137 (2022).
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b2838137
pubmed: 35322948
Heintze, S. D., Faouzi, M., Rousson, V. & Ozcan, M. Correlation of wear in vivo and six laboratory wear methods. Dent. Mater. 28, 961–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.006 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.006
pubmed: 22698644
Shellis, R. P., Ganss, C., Ren, Y., Zero, D. T. & Lussi, A. Methodology and models in erosion research: Discussion and conclusions. Caries Res. 45(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1159/000325971 (2011).
doi: 10.1159/000325971
pubmed: 21625135