The cost-effectiveness of semaglutide in reducing cardiovascular risk among people with overweight and obesity and existing cardiovascular disease, but without diabetes.

Cardiovascular disease GLP-1RAs, cost-effectiveness Obesity Semaglutide

Journal

European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes
ISSN: 2058-1742
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101677796

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 4 8 2024
pubmed: 4 8 2024
entrez: 3 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) trial demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular outcomes in people with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and overweight or obesity (but without diabetes). However, the cost of the medication has raised concerns about its financial viability and accessibility within healthcare systems. This study explored whether use of semaglutide for the secondary prevention of CVD in overweight or obesity is cost-effective from the Australian healthcare perspective. A Markov model was developed based on the SELECT trial to model the clinical outcomes and costs of a hypothetical population treated with semaglutide versus placebo, in addition to standard care, and followed up over 20 years. With each annual cycle, subjects were at risk of having non-fatal CVD events or dying. Model inputs were derived from SELECT and published literature. Costs were obtained from Australian sources. All outcomes were discounted by 5% annually. The main outcome of interest was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of cost per year of life saved (YoLS) and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. With an annual estimated cost of semaglutide of A${\$}$4175, the model resulted in ICERs of A${\$}$99 853 (US${\$}$143 504; £40 873) per YoLS and A${\$}$96 055 (US${\$}$138 046; £39 318) per QALY gained. Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of A${\$}$50 000, semaglutide is not considered cost-effective at the current price. A price of ≤ A${\$}$2000 per year or more targeted use in high-risk patients would be needed for it to be considered cost-effective in the Australian setting.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
The Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) trial demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular outcomes in people with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and overweight or obesity (but without diabetes). However, the cost of the medication has raised concerns about its financial viability and accessibility within healthcare systems. This study explored whether use of semaglutide for the secondary prevention of CVD in overweight or obesity is cost-effective from the Australian healthcare perspective.
METHODS METHODS
A Markov model was developed based on the SELECT trial to model the clinical outcomes and costs of a hypothetical population treated with semaglutide versus placebo, in addition to standard care, and followed up over 20 years. With each annual cycle, subjects were at risk of having non-fatal CVD events or dying. Model inputs were derived from SELECT and published literature. Costs were obtained from Australian sources. All outcomes were discounted by 5% annually. The main outcome of interest was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of cost per year of life saved (YoLS) and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
RESULTS RESULTS
With an annual estimated cost of semaglutide of A${\$}$4175, the model resulted in ICERs of A${\$}$99 853 (US${\$}$143 504; £40 873) per YoLS and A${\$}$96 055 (US${\$}$138 046; £39 318) per QALY gained.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of A${\$}$50 000, semaglutide is not considered cost-effective at the current price. A price of ≤ A${\$}$2000 per year or more targeted use in high-risk patients would be needed for it to be considered cost-effective in the Australian setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39096165
pii: 7726721
doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae063
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Auteurs

Ella Zomer (E)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Jennifer Zhou (J)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Adam J Nelson (AJ)

Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Priya Sumithran (P)

Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Shane Nanayakkara (S)

Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Jocasta Ball (J)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

David Kaye (D)

Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Danny Liew (D)

Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Stephen J Nicholls (SJ)

Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Dion Stub (D)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Sophia Zoungas (S)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Classifications MeSH