Feasibility of differentiating gait in Parkinson's disease and spinocerebellar degeneration using a pose estimation algorithm in two-dimensional video.

Gait disturbance Machine learning Parkinson's disease Spinocerebellar degeneration ataxia

Journal

Journal of the neurological sciences
ISSN: 1878-5883
Titre abrégé: J Neurol Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0375403

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 27 05 2024
revised: 18 07 2024
accepted: 27 07 2024
medline: 4 8 2024
pubmed: 4 8 2024
entrez: 3 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Although pose estimation algorithms have been used to analyze videos of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to assess symptoms, their feasibility for differentiating PD from other neurological disorders that cause gait disturbances has not been evaluated yet. We aimed to determine whether it was possible to differentiate between PD and spinocerebellar degeneration (SCD) by analyzing video recordings of patient gait using a pose estimation algorithm. We videotaped 82 patients with PD and 61 patients with SCD performing the timed up-and-go test. A pose estimation algorithm was used to extract the coordinates of 25 key points of the participants from these videos. A transformer-based deep neural network (DNN) model was trained to predict PD or SCD using the extracted coordinate data. We employed a leave-one-participant-out cross-validation method to evaluate the predictive performance of the trained model using accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. As there were significant differences in age, weight, and body mass index between the PD and SCD groups, propensity score matching was used to perform the same experiment in a population that did not differ in these clinical characteristics. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the trained model were 0.86, 0.94, and 0.75 for all participants and 0.83, 0.88, and 0.78 for the participants extracted by propensity score matching. The differentiation of PD and SCD using key point coordinates extracted from gait videos and the DNN model was feasible and could be used as a collaborative tool in clinical practice and telemedicine.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Although pose estimation algorithms have been used to analyze videos of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to assess symptoms, their feasibility for differentiating PD from other neurological disorders that cause gait disturbances has not been evaluated yet. We aimed to determine whether it was possible to differentiate between PD and spinocerebellar degeneration (SCD) by analyzing video recordings of patient gait using a pose estimation algorithm.
METHODS METHODS
We videotaped 82 patients with PD and 61 patients with SCD performing the timed up-and-go test. A pose estimation algorithm was used to extract the coordinates of 25 key points of the participants from these videos. A transformer-based deep neural network (DNN) model was trained to predict PD or SCD using the extracted coordinate data. We employed a leave-one-participant-out cross-validation method to evaluate the predictive performance of the trained model using accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. As there were significant differences in age, weight, and body mass index between the PD and SCD groups, propensity score matching was used to perform the same experiment in a population that did not differ in these clinical characteristics.
RESULTS RESULTS
The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the trained model were 0.86, 0.94, and 0.75 for all participants and 0.83, 0.88, and 0.78 for the participants extracted by propensity score matching.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The differentiation of PD and SCD using key point coordinates extracted from gait videos and the DNN model was feasible and could be used as a collaborative tool in clinical practice and telemedicine.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39096835
pii: S0022-510X(24)00293-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123158
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

123158

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Katsuki Eguchi (K)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan; Hokuyukai Neurological Hospital, 4-30, 2jo, 2cho-me, Nijuyonken, Nishi-ku, Sapporo 063-0802, Japan. Electronic address: k198762@gmail.com.

Hiroaki Yaguchi (H)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.

Hisashi Uwatoko (H)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.

Yuki Iida (Y)

Hokuyukai Neurological Hospital, 4-30, 2jo, 2cho-me, Nijuyonken, Nishi-ku, Sapporo 063-0802, Japan.

Shinsuke Hamada (S)

Hokuyukai Neurological Hospital, 4-30, 2jo, 2cho-me, Nijuyonken, Nishi-ku, Sapporo 063-0802, Japan.

Sanae Honma (S)

Hokuyukai Neurological Hospital, 4-30, 2jo, 2cho-me, Nijuyonken, Nishi-ku, Sapporo 063-0802, Japan.

Asako Takei (A)

Hokuyukai Neurological Hospital, 4-30, 2jo, 2cho-me, Nijuyonken, Nishi-ku, Sapporo 063-0802, Japan.

Fumio Moriwaka (F)

Hokuyukai Neurological Hospital, 4-30, 2jo, 2cho-me, Nijuyonken, Nishi-ku, Sapporo 063-0802, Japan.

Ichiro Yabe (I)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.

Classifications MeSH