Interstitial lung disease in patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials: the ILDE study.

ILD early phase interstitial lung disease new drug development phase I trials safety

Journal

ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 09 04 2024
revised: 29 06 2024
accepted: 01 07 2024
medline: 4 8 2024
pubmed: 4 8 2024
entrez: 3 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders sharing pathophysiological inflammatory mechanisms, leading to parenchymal distortions. The prevalence of ILD with new cancer drugs is underreported: the identification of potential determinants is priority. ILDE is a retrospective study aimed at describing the clinical course and potential determinants of ILD in patients receiving experimental treatments. We identified 226 eligible patients, of whom 5.3% (n = 12) had ILD. In five patients, the diagnosis was radiological, while seven patients had initial cough, dyspnea, fatigue or fever. ILD was graded as grade 1 (G1) in four, G2 in five and G3 in three patients. The first occurrence of ILD resolved completely in 50% of patients (n = 6/12). No patient had fatal ILD. Eight patients (66.7%) resumed the treatment after the first episode of ILD, while four patients (33.3%) had to discontinue the therapy. Five out of six patients had resolved the first ILD episode and then resumed treatment, experiencing a second ILD episode (n = 5/6; 83.3%). The second ILD event was G1 in three patients and G2 in two patients, resulting in three patients who eventually discontinued the treatment (n = 3/5; 60%). Correlation analysis showed a higher risk of ILD in older patients (P = 0.051), those who had received previous chest radiation therapy (P = 0.047) or those receiving antibody-drug conjugates (P = 0.006). In a survival analysis adjusted for immortal time bias, ILD was not independently prognostic (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.23-1.09, P = 0.082). In ILDE, patients experiencing ILD had generally good outcomes, and many could resume the cancer treatments. Implementing best practices to prompt diagnosis and management of ILD is critical to treat a potentially severe adverse effect of new drugs, while not affecting patients' outcomes. Research efforts to identify risk factors is warranted, to implement risk-based monitoring schedules and develop ad hoc strategies to improve the cure rates of ILD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders sharing pathophysiological inflammatory mechanisms, leading to parenchymal distortions. The prevalence of ILD with new cancer drugs is underreported: the identification of potential determinants is priority.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
ILDE is a retrospective study aimed at describing the clinical course and potential determinants of ILD in patients receiving experimental treatments.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 226 eligible patients, of whom 5.3% (n = 12) had ILD. In five patients, the diagnosis was radiological, while seven patients had initial cough, dyspnea, fatigue or fever. ILD was graded as grade 1 (G1) in four, G2 in five and G3 in three patients. The first occurrence of ILD resolved completely in 50% of patients (n = 6/12). No patient had fatal ILD. Eight patients (66.7%) resumed the treatment after the first episode of ILD, while four patients (33.3%) had to discontinue the therapy. Five out of six patients had resolved the first ILD episode and then resumed treatment, experiencing a second ILD episode (n = 5/6; 83.3%). The second ILD event was G1 in three patients and G2 in two patients, resulting in three patients who eventually discontinued the treatment (n = 3/5; 60%). Correlation analysis showed a higher risk of ILD in older patients (P = 0.051), those who had received previous chest radiation therapy (P = 0.047) or those receiving antibody-drug conjugates (P = 0.006). In a survival analysis adjusted for immortal time bias, ILD was not independently prognostic (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.23-1.09, P = 0.082).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In ILDE, patients experiencing ILD had generally good outcomes, and many could resume the cancer treatments. Implementing best practices to prompt diagnosis and management of ILD is critical to treat a potentially severe adverse effect of new drugs, while not affecting patients' outcomes. Research efforts to identify risk factors is warranted, to implement risk-based monitoring schedules and develop ad hoc strategies to improve the cure rates of ILD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39096894
pii: S2059-7029(24)01427-3
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103658
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103658

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

D Trapani (D)

Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.

R Scalia (R)

Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Surgical and Oncological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo.

E Giordano (E)

Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.

G Castellano (G)

Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.

G Doi (G)

Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

A Gaeta (A)

Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

G Pellizzari (G)

Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.

A Carnevale Schianca (A)

Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.

J Katrini (J)

Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.

S D'Ambrosio (S)

Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.

C Santoro (C)

Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.

L Guidi (L)

Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.

C Valenza (C)

Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.

C Belli (C)

Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan.

S Gandini (S)

Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

A Russo (A)

Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

G Curigliano (G)

Department of Oncology & Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of New Drugs & Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan. Electronic address: Giuseppe.curigliano@ieo.it.

Classifications MeSH