Venom component allergen IgE measurement in the diagnosis and management of insect sting allergy.

Hymenoptera venom allergy IgE component-resolved diagnosis molecular diagnostics venom allergens

Journal

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
ISSN: 2213-2201
Titre abrégé: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101597220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 08 06 2024
revised: 03 07 2024
accepted: 15 07 2024
medline: 4 8 2024
pubmed: 4 8 2024
entrez: 3 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Accurate identification of the allergy-eliciting stinging insect(s) is essential to insuring effective management of Hymenoptera venom-allergic individuals with venom-specific immunotherapy (VIT). Diagnostic testing using whole venom extracts with skin tests and serological-based analyses remains the first level of discrimination for honeybee versus vespid venom sensitization in clinical history-positive patients. As a second-level evaluation, serological testing using molecular venom allergens can further discriminate genuine sensitization (honeybee venom: Api m 1, 3, 4, and 10 versus yellow jacket venom/Polistes dominula venom Ves v 1/Pol d 1 and Ves v 5/Pol d 5) from inter-species cross-reactivity [hyaluronidases (Api m 2, Ves v 2, Pol d 2) and dipeptidyl peptidases IV (Api m 5, Ves v 3, Pol d 3)]. Clinical laboratories use a number of singleplex, oligoplex, and multiplex immunoassays that employ both extracted whole venom and molecular venom allergens (highlighted above) for confirmation of allergic venom sensitization. Established quantitative singleplex autoanalyzers have general governmental regulatory clearance worldwide for venom allergic patient testing with maximally achievable analytical sensitivity (0.1 kUA/L) and confirmed reproducibility (inter-assay CVs<10%). Emerging oligo- and multiplex (fixed panel) assays conserve on serum and are more cost-effective, but they need regulatory clearance in some countries and are prone to higher rates of detecting asymptomatic sensitization. Ultimately, the patient's clinical history, combined with the proof of sensitization, is the final arbiter in the diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39097146
pii: S2213-2198(24)00773-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.07.023
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Simon Blank (S)

Center of Allergy & Environment (ZAUM), Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health & Helmholtz Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: simon.blank@tum.de.

Peter Korošec (P)

Laboratory for Clinical Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

Benjamin O Slusarenko (BO)

Center of Allergy & Environment (ZAUM), Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health & Helmholtz Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.

Markus Ollert (M)

Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg; Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Robert G Hamilton (RG)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: rhamilt2@jhmi.edu.

Classifications MeSH