Follow-up strategies in pediatric cholesteatoma: a systematic review.
Cholesteatoma
Chronic otitis media
Follow-up
Magnetic resonance imaging
Otology
Pediatric cholesteatoma
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Aug 2024
04 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
02
05
2024
accepted:
25
07
2024
medline:
4
8
2024
pubmed:
4
8
2024
entrez:
4
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The aim of this article was to systematically review the literature on the pediatric population surgically treated for cholesteatoma and describe the applied post-operative follow-up strategies. A systematic review was conducted following the Primary Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement recommendations. After running the selected search string in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar, studies in English, reporting on surgically treated pediatric cholesteatoma patients (age younger or equal to 18 year-old) were retrieved. Both primary and revision cholesteatoma surgeries were included. Articles lacking specific data on post-surgical follow-up and case series with less than 10 patients were excluded. Nineteen papers, published between 2000 and 2023, were included for final analysis. Fourteen studies were retrospective and five prospective, for a total of 1319 patients and 1349 operated ears. Male to female ratio was 1.8:1, with a mean age at surgery of 10.4 years (range 1-18). The mean length of the follow-up after surgery was 4.4 ± 1.7 years (range 1-6.9). Clinical follow-up was detailed in 9 studies (47%) with otomicroscopy being the most common evaluation. In most articles (n = 8, 50%), MRI alone was utilized for radiological follow-up, while in 3 studies (19%), CT scans were employed exclusively. In 5 studies (31%), MRI was combined with CT scans. The timing of radiological investigations varied widely (ranging from 6 months to 3 years). A second-look strategy was reported in 14 studies (74%). This systematic review highlights the heterogeneity of the follow-up strategies applied to pediatric patients after cholesteatoma surgery, both in terms of timing and types of investigations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39097857
doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08875-8
pii: 10.1007/s00405-024-08875-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Kuo CL, Shiao AS, Yung M et al (2015) Updates and knowledge gaps in cholesteatoma research. Biomed Res Int 2015:854024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/854024
doi: 10.1155/2015/854024
pubmed: 25866816
pmcid: 4381684
Yosefof E, Yaniv D, Tzelnick S et al (2022) Post-operative MRI detection of residual cholesteatoma in pediatric patients—the yield of serial scans over a long follow-up. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 158:111172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111172
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111172
pubmed: 35526314
Plouin-Gaudon I, Bossard D, Fuchsmann C, Ayari-Khalfallah S, Froehlich P (2010) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for evaluation of pediatric recurrent cholesteatomas. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74(1):22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.035
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.035
pubmed: 19889465
Molteni G, Fabbris C, Molinari G et al (2019) Correlation between pre-operative CT findings and intra-operative features in pediatric cholesteatoma: a retrospective study on 26 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(9):2449–2456
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05500-x
pubmed: 31175451
Beckmann S, Hool SL, Yacoub A et al (2023) Accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography compared to high-definition ear endoscopy to assess cholesteatoma extension. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 169(5):1276–1281. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.413
doi: 10.1002/ohn.413
pubmed: 37418100
Lee S, Kim HY, Lee KH et al (2024) Risk of hematologic malignant neoplasms from head CT radiation in children and adolescents presenting with minor head trauma: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10646-2
doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10646-2
pubmed: 39042304
pmcid: 11255039
Lingam RK, Bassett P (2017) A meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging in detecting middle ear cholesteatoma: 10 years on. Otol Neurotol 38(4):521–528. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001353
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001353
pubmed: 28195998
Daoudi H, Levy R, Baudouin R et al (2024) Performance of non-EPI DW MRI for pediatric cholesteatoma follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 170(1):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.398
doi: 10.1002/ohn.398
pubmed: 37313857
Baudouin R, Simon F, Levy R et al (2023) Early magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose residual cholesteatoma in children and benefit of radiological rereview. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 169(6):1631–1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.392
doi: 10.1002/ohn.392
pubmed: 37264987
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
pubmed: 33782057
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG et al (2014) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg (London, England) 12(12):1500–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014
Silvola J, Palva T (2000) One-stage revision surgery for pediatric cholesteatoma: long-term results and comparison with primary surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 56(2):135–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-5876(00)00414-6
doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(00)00414-6
pubmed: 11115686
Ueda H, Nakashima T, Nakata S (2001) Surgical strategy for cholesteatoma in children. Auris Nasus Larynx 28(2):125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0385-8146(00)00095-
doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(00)00095-
pubmed: 11240319
Vercruysse JP, De Foer B, Somers T, Casselman JW, Offeciers E (2008) Mastoid and epitympanic bony obliteration in pediatric cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 29(7):953–960. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318184f4d6
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318184f4d6
pubmed: 18719515
Geoffray A, Guesmi M, Nebbia JF, Leloutre B, Bailleux S, Maschi C (2013) MRI for the diagnosis of recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma in children–can we optimize the technique? Prelim Study Pediatric Radiol 43(4):464–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2502-3
doi: 10.1007/s00247-012-2502-3
Trinidade A, Skingsley A, Yung MW (2015) Pediatric cholesteatoma surgery using a single-staged canal wall down approach: results of a 5 year longitudinal study. Otol Neurotol 36(1):82–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000598
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000598
pubmed: 25299830
Lecler A, Lenoir M, Peron J et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging at one year for detection of postoperative residual cholesteatoma in children: Is it too early? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 79(8):1268–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.05.028
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.05.028
pubmed: 26071017
Sarcu D, Isaacson G (2016) Long-term results of endoscopically assisted pediatric cholesteatoma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154(3):535–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599815622441
doi: 10.1177/0194599815622441
pubmed: 26721891
van Dinther JJ, Vercruysse JP, Camp S et al (2015) The bony obliteration tympanoplasty in pediatric cholesteatoma: long-term safety and hygienic results. Otol Neurotol 36(9):1504–1509. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000851
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000851
pubmed: 26375973
James AL, Cushing S, Papsin BC (2016) Residual cholesteatoma after endoscope-guided surgery in children. Otol Neurotol 37(2):196–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000948
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000948
pubmed: 26719964
Cohen MS, Basonbul RA, Kozin ED, Lee DJ (2017) Residual cholesteatoma during second-look procedures following primary pediatric endoscopic ear surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 157(6):1034–1040. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817729136
doi: 10.1177/0194599817729136
pubmed: 28871887
Ghadersohi S, Carter JM, Hoff SR (2017) Endoscopic transcanal approach to the middle ear for management of pediatric cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 127(11):2653–2658. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26654
doi: 10.1002/lary.26654
pubmed: 28543174
Morita Y, Takahashi K, Izumi S et al (2017) Risk factors of recurrence in pediatric congenital cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 38(10):1463–1469. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001587
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001587
pubmed: 28953605
Hao J, Chen M, Liu B et al (2021) The significance of staging in the treatment of congenital cholesteatoma in children. Ear Nose Throat J 100(10):1125S-1131S
doi: 10.1177/0145561320933965
pubmed: 32603216
McCallum R, Coleman H, Pervaiz H, Irwin G, McAllister K (2023) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of post-operative paediatric cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otol 137(5):484–489. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215122002055
doi: 10.1017/S0022215122002055
pubmed: 36184898
Hu X, Chen M, Dai W, Zhang C, Li S (2023) Efficiency of intraoperative endoscopic inspection in reducing residuals in canal-wall-up surgery for pediatric cholesteatoma involving the mastoid. Eur Arch Oto Rhinolaryngol 280(8):3593–3600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07857-6
doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07857-6
Cohen MS, Basonbul RA, Barber SR, Kozin ED, Rivas AC, Lee DJ (2018) Development and validation of an endoscopic ear surgery classification system. Laryngoscope 128(4):967–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26802
doi: 10.1002/lary.26802
pubmed: 28782289
Yung M, Tono T, Olszewska E et al (2017) EAONO/JOS joint consensus statements on the definitions, classification and staging of middle ear cholesteatoma. J Int Adv Otol 13(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2017.3363
doi: 10.5152/iao.2017.3363
pubmed: 28059056
Luu K, Chi D, Kiyosaki KK, Chang KW (2019) Updates in pediatric cholesteatoma: minimizing intervention while maximizing outcomes. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 52(5):813–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2019.05.003
doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2019.05.003
pubmed: 31280890
Jackler RK, Santa Maria PL, Varsak YK, Nguyen A, Blevins NH (2015) A new theory on the pathogenesis of acquired cholesteatoma: mucosal traction. Laryngoscope 125(Suppl 4):S1–S14. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25261
doi: 10.1002/lary.25261
pubmed: 26013635
Preciado DA (2012) Biology of cholesteatoma: special considerations in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76(3):319–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.12.014
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.12.014
pubmed: 22264818
McRackan TR, Abdellatif WM, Wanna GB et al (2011) Evaluation of second look procedures for pediatric cholesteatomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145(1):154–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599810396624
doi: 10.1177/0194599810396624
pubmed: 21493359
Karmody CS, Byahatti SV, Blevins N, Valtonen H, Northrop C (1998) The origin of congenital cholesteatoma. Am J Otol 19(3):292–297
pubmed: 9596177
Levenson MJ, Michaels L, Parisier SC (1989) Congenital cholesteatomas of the middle ear in children: origin and management. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 22(5):941–954
doi: 10.1016/S0030-6665(20)31369-4
pubmed: 2694070
Nelson M, Roger G, Koltai PJ et al (2002) Congenital cholesteatoma: classification, management, and outcome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(7):810–814. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.7.810
doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.7.810
pubmed: 12117341
Denoyelle F, Simon F, Chang KW et al (2020) International pediatric otolaryngology group (IPOG) consensus recommendations: congenital cholesteatoma. Otol neurotol 41(3):345–351. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002521
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002521
pubmed: 31851066
James AL (2024) Cholesteatoma severity determines the risk of recurrent paediatric cholesteatoma more than the surgical approach. J Clin Med 13(3):836. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030836
doi: 10.3390/jcm13030836
pubmed: 38337530
pmcid: 10856742
Nakazawa T, Yamamoto Y, Kanno K et al (2023) Time analysis of recidivism in acquired cholesteatoma using the kaplan-meier method. Otol Neurotol 44(6):e393–e397. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003908
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003908
pubmed: 37254255
James AL, Tono T, Cohen MS et al (2019) International collaborative assessment of the validity of the EAONO-JOS cholesteatoma staging system. Otol Neurotol 40(5):630–637. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002168
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002168
pubmed: 31083088
Kerckhoffs KG, Kommer MB, van Strien TH et al (2016) The disease recurrence rate after the canal wall up or canal wall down technique in adults. Laryngoscope 126(4):980–987. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25591
doi: 10.1002/lary.25591
pubmed: 26404516
Solis-Pazmino P, Siepmann T, Scheffler P et al (2023) Canal wall up versus canal wall down mastoidectomy techniques in the pediatric population with cholesteatoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 173:111658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111658
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111658
pubmed: 37666040
Fermi M, Siggemann T, Melchiorri C et al (2022) Revision canal-wall down surgery: comparison of surgical outcomes with three different techniques. Eur Arch Oto Rhinolaryngol 279(4):1731–1739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06829-y
doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06829-y
Bazzi K, Wong E, Jufas N, Patel N (2019) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 118:90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.031
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.031
pubmed: 30599286
De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Bernaerts A et al (2008) Detection of postoperative residual cholesteatoma with non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Otol Neurotol 29(4):513–517. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31816c7c3b
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31816c7c3b
pubmed: 18520587
De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Bernaerts A et al (2010) Middle ear cholesteatoma: non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging–value in detection. Radiology 255(3):866–872. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091140
doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091140
pubmed: 20501723
van Dinther JJS, Coopman R, Vercruysse JP et al (2018) The bony obliteration tympanoplasty in pediatric cholesteatoma: long-term hearing results. Otol Neurotol 39(6):715–723. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001846
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001846
pubmed: 29889781
van der Toom HFE, van Dinther JJS, Zarowski A et al (2022) Radiological follow-up after the bony obliteration tympanoplasty in detecting residual cholesteatoma: towards an optimal postoperative mr imaging protocol. Otol Neurotol 43(1):e79–e87. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003348
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003348
pubmed: 34607996
Molinari G, Ragonesi T, Hool SL et al (2020) Surgical implications of 3D vs 2D endoscopic ear surgery: a case-control study. Eur Arch Oto Rhinolaryngol 277(12):3323–3330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06040-5
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06040-5
Marchioni D, Rubini A, Gazzini L et al (2018) Complications in endoscopic ear surgery. Otol Neurotol 39(8):1012–1017. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001933
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001933
pubmed: 30113561
Han SY, Lee DY, Chung J, Kim YH (2019) Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic ear surgery in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 129(6):1444–1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27556
doi: 10.1002/lary.27556
pubmed: 30593662