'Someone must do it': multiple views on family's role in end-of-life care - an international qualitative study.

care burden end-of-life care family caregiving palliative care qualitative research

Journal

Palliative care and social practice
ISSN: 2632-3524
Titre abrégé: Palliat Care Soc Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101754997

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 06 12 2023
accepted: 22 05 2024
medline: 5 8 2024
pubmed: 5 8 2024
entrez: 5 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Family is a crucial social institution in end-of-life care. Family caregivers are encouraged to take on more responsibility at different times during the illness, providing personal and medical care. Unpaid work can be overburdening, with women often spending more time in care work than men. This study explored multiple views on the family's role in end-of-life care from a critical perspective and a relational autonomy lens, considering gender in a socio-cultural context and applying a relational autonomy framework. It explored patients, relatives and healthcare providers' points of view. This qualitative study was part of the iLIVE project, involving patients with incurable diseases, their relatives and health carers from hospital and non-hospital sites. Individual interviews of at least five patients, five relatives and five healthcare providers in each of the 10 participating countries using a semi-structured interview guide based on Giger-Davidhizar-Haff's model for cultural assessment in end-of-life care. Thematic analysis was performed initially within each country and across the complete dataset. Data sources, including researchers' field notes, were translated into English for international collaborative analysis. We conducted 158 interviews (57 patients, 48 relatives and 53 healthcare providers). After collaborative analysis, five themes were identified across the countries: family as a finite care resource, families' active role in decision-making, open communication with the family, care burden and socio-cultural mandates. Families were crucial for providing informal care during severe illness, often acting as the only resource. Patients acknowledged the strain on carers, leading to a conceptual model highlighting socio-cultural influences, relational autonomy, care burden and feminisation of care. Society, health teams and family systems still need to better support the role of family caregivers described across countries. The model implies that family roles in end-of-life care balance relational autonomy with socio-cultural values. Real-world end-of-life scenarios do not occur in a wholly individualistic, closed-off atmosphere but in an interpersonal setting. Gender is often prominent, but normative ideas influence the decisions and actions of all involved.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Family is a crucial social institution in end-of-life care. Family caregivers are encouraged to take on more responsibility at different times during the illness, providing personal and medical care. Unpaid work can be overburdening, with women often spending more time in care work than men.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
This study explored multiple views on the family's role in end-of-life care from a critical perspective and a relational autonomy lens, considering gender in a socio-cultural context and applying a relational autonomy framework. It explored patients, relatives and healthcare providers' points of view.
Design UNASSIGNED
This qualitative study was part of the iLIVE project, involving patients with incurable diseases, their relatives and health carers from hospital and non-hospital sites.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Individual interviews of at least five patients, five relatives and five healthcare providers in each of the 10 participating countries using a semi-structured interview guide based on Giger-Davidhizar-Haff's model for cultural assessment in end-of-life care. Thematic analysis was performed initially within each country and across the complete dataset. Data sources, including researchers' field notes, were translated into English for international collaborative analysis.
Results UNASSIGNED
We conducted 158 interviews (57 patients, 48 relatives and 53 healthcare providers). After collaborative analysis, five themes were identified across the countries: family as a finite care resource, families' active role in decision-making, open communication with the family, care burden and socio-cultural mandates. Families were crucial for providing informal care during severe illness, often acting as the only resource. Patients acknowledged the strain on carers, leading to a conceptual model highlighting socio-cultural influences, relational autonomy, care burden and feminisation of care.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Society, health teams and family systems still need to better support the role of family caregivers described across countries. The model implies that family roles in end-of-life care balance relational autonomy with socio-cultural values. Real-world end-of-life scenarios do not occur in a wholly individualistic, closed-off atmosphere but in an interpersonal setting. Gender is often prominent, but normative ideas influence the decisions and actions of all involved.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39099623
doi: 10.1177/26323524241260425
pii: 10.1177_26323524241260425
pmc: PMC11295216
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

26323524241260425

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), 2024.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Vilma A Tripodoro (VA)

Instituto Pallium Latinoamérica, Bonpland 2287, Ciudad de Buenos Aires (1425), Argentina.
Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas Alfredo Lanari, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
ATLANTES Global Observatory of Palliative Care, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.

Verónica I Veloso (VI)

Instituto Pallium Latinoamérica, Buenos Aires, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas Alfredo Lanari, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Eva Víbora Martín (E)

Fundación Cudeca, Malaga, Spain.

Hana Kodba-Čeh (H)

University Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Research Department, Golnik, Slovenia.

Miša Bakan (M)

University Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Research Department, Golnik, Slovenia.

Birgit H Rasmussen (BH)

Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Sweden.
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Sweden.

Sofía C Zambrano (SC)

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University Centre for Palliative Care, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Melanie Joshi (M)

Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Svandis Íris Hálfdánardóttir (SÍ)

Palliative Care Unit, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik Iceland.

Guðlaug Helga Ásgeirsdóttir (GH)

Palliative Care Unit, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik Iceland.

Elisabeth Romarheim (E)

Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Dagny Faksvåg Haugen (DF)

Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Clinical Medicine K1, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Tamsin McGlinchey (T)

Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Berivan Yildiz (B)

Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca (P)

Fundación Cudeca, Malaga, Spain.
Instituto IBIMA - Plataforma Bionand, Málaga, Spain.

Anne Goossensen (A)

University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Urška Lunder (U)

University Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Research Department, Golnik, Slovenia.

Agnes van der Heide (A)

Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH