Concizumab prophylaxis in persons with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors: patient-reported outcome results from the phase 3 explorer7 study.

concizumab health-related quality of life hemophilia A hemophilia B patient preference patient-reported outcomes

Journal

Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis
ISSN: 2475-0379
Titre abrégé: Res Pract Thromb Haemost
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101703775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2024
Historique:
received: 06 02 2024
revised: 13 05 2024
accepted: 11 06 2024
medline: 5 8 2024
pubmed: 5 8 2024
entrez: 5 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reflect patient perceptions of disease and treatment and are important for evaluating new therapies. Evaluate the effects of once-daily concizumab prophylaxis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), treatment burden, and treatment preference in males aged ≥12 years with hemophilia A/B with inhibitors. Patients enrolled in the multicenter, open-label explorer7 phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04083781) were randomized to receive no prophylaxis (arm 1) or concizumab prophylaxis (arm 2) or were nonrandomly allocated to concizumab prophylaxis (arms 3 and 4). The study included questionnaires to assess patients' perception of HRQoL (Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults), treatment burden (Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure), and treatment preference (Haemophilia Patient Preference Questionnaire). The estimated treatment difference between patients receiving concizumab prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis at week 24 for Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults "total score" was -22.6 points (95% CI, -42.5; -2.7), directionally favoring patients receiving concizumab prophylaxis. For Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure "total score," the estimated treatment difference was -19.9 points (95% CI, -34.3, -5.6) in favor of concizumab vs no prophylaxis. The majority of patients receiving concizumab expressed a preference for concizumab over their previous treatment, the main reasons being "fewer bleeds," "require less time," and "less painful to inject." Across all PROs, there were less responses collected than anticipated, limiting interpretations. PROs collected during the explorer7 study showed improvements in some domains of HRQoL, treatment burden, and patient treatment preference in persons with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors receiving concizumab prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reflect patient perceptions of disease and treatment and are important for evaluating new therapies.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
Evaluate the effects of once-daily concizumab prophylaxis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), treatment burden, and treatment preference in males aged ≥12 years with hemophilia A/B with inhibitors.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Patients enrolled in the multicenter, open-label explorer7 phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04083781) were randomized to receive no prophylaxis (arm 1) or concizumab prophylaxis (arm 2) or were nonrandomly allocated to concizumab prophylaxis (arms 3 and 4). The study included questionnaires to assess patients' perception of HRQoL (Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults), treatment burden (Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure), and treatment preference (Haemophilia Patient Preference Questionnaire).
Results UNASSIGNED
The estimated treatment difference between patients receiving concizumab prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis at week 24 for Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults "total score" was -22.6 points (95% CI, -42.5; -2.7), directionally favoring patients receiving concizumab prophylaxis. For Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure "total score," the estimated treatment difference was -19.9 points (95% CI, -34.3, -5.6) in favor of concizumab vs no prophylaxis. The majority of patients receiving concizumab expressed a preference for concizumab over their previous treatment, the main reasons being "fewer bleeds," "require less time," and "less painful to inject." Across all PROs, there were less responses collected than anticipated, limiting interpretations.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
PROs collected during the explorer7 study showed improvements in some domains of HRQoL, treatment burden, and patient treatment preference in persons with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors receiving concizumab prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39099801
doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102476
pii: S2475-0379(24)00165-1
pmc: PMC11295565
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04083781']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

102476

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Auteurs

Huyen Tran (H)

Ronald Sawers Haemophilia Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Sylvia von Mackensen (S)

Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Aby Abraham (A)

Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Giancarlo Castaman (G)

Center for Bleeding Disorders and Coagulation, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Kingsley Hampton (K)

Department of Haematology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

Paul Knoebl (P)

Division of Hematology and Hemostasis, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Silvia Linari (S)

Center for Bleeding Disorders and Coagulation, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Jan Odgaard-Jensen (J)

Biostatistics HTA, Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.

Jesper Skov Neergaard (JS)

Safety Surveillance CVD I, Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.

Oleksandra Stasyshyn (O)

Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine, Lviv, Ukraine.

Jay Jay Thaung Zaw (JJ)

Medical & Science Rare Bleeding Disorders, Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.

Bulent Zulfikar (B)

Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey.

Amy Shapiro (A)

Indiana Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Classifications MeSH