Development and initial evaluation of a clinical prediction model for risk of treatment resistance in first-episode psychosis: Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment (SPIRIT).

First-episode schizophrenia decision analysis mixed methods prognostic model treatment resistant

Journal

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science
ISSN: 1472-1465
Titre abrégé: Br J Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0342367

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 5 8 2024
pubmed: 5 8 2024
entrez: 5 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

A clinical tool to estimate the risk of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) would inform early detection of TRS and overcome the delay of up to 5 years in starting TRS medication. To develop and evaluate a model that could predict the risk of TRS in routine clinical practice. We used data from two UK-based FEP cohorts (GAP and AESOP-10) to develop and internally validate a prognostic model that supports identification of patients at high-risk of TRS soon after FEP diagnosis. Using sociodemographic and clinical predictors, a model for predicting risk of TRS was developed based on penalised logistic regression, with missing data handled using multiple imputation. Internal validation was undertaken via bootstrapping, obtaining optimism-adjusted estimates of the model's performance. Interviews and focus groups with clinicians were conducted to establish clinically relevant risk thresholds and understand the acceptability and perceived utility of the model. We included seven factors in the prediction model that are predominantly assessed in clinical practice in patients with FEP. The model predicted treatment resistance among the 1081 patients with reasonable accuracy; the model's C-statistic was 0.727 (95% CI 0.723-0.732) prior to shrinkage and 0.687 after adjustment for optimism. Calibration was good (expected/observed ratio: 0.999; calibration-in-the-large: 0.000584) after adjustment for optimism. We developed and internally validated a prediction model with reasonably good predictive metrics. Clinicians, patients and carers were involved in the development process. External validation of the tool is needed followed by co-design methodology to support implementation in early intervention services.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
A clinical tool to estimate the risk of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) would inform early detection of TRS and overcome the delay of up to 5 years in starting TRS medication.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To develop and evaluate a model that could predict the risk of TRS in routine clinical practice.
METHOD METHODS
We used data from two UK-based FEP cohorts (GAP and AESOP-10) to develop and internally validate a prognostic model that supports identification of patients at high-risk of TRS soon after FEP diagnosis. Using sociodemographic and clinical predictors, a model for predicting risk of TRS was developed based on penalised logistic regression, with missing data handled using multiple imputation. Internal validation was undertaken via bootstrapping, obtaining optimism-adjusted estimates of the model's performance. Interviews and focus groups with clinicians were conducted to establish clinically relevant risk thresholds and understand the acceptability and perceived utility of the model.
RESULTS RESULTS
We included seven factors in the prediction model that are predominantly assessed in clinical practice in patients with FEP. The model predicted treatment resistance among the 1081 patients with reasonable accuracy; the model's C-statistic was 0.727 (95% CI 0.723-0.732) prior to shrinkage and 0.687 after adjustment for optimism. Calibration was good (expected/observed ratio: 0.999; calibration-in-the-large: 0.000584) after adjustment for optimism.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We developed and internally validated a prediction model with reasonably good predictive metrics. Clinicians, patients and carers were involved in the development process. External validation of the tool is needed followed by co-design methodology to support implementation in early intervention services.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39101211
doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.101
pii: S0007125024001016
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-10

Subventions

Organisme : Research for Patient Benefit Programme
ID : 200510

Auteurs

Saeed Farooq (S)

School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), UK; and St George's Hospital, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, UK.

Miriam Hattle (M)

Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK.

Tom Kingstone (T)

School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), UK; and St George's Hospital, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, UK.

Olesya Ajnakina (O)

Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; and Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.

Paola Dazzan (P)

Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Arsime Demjaha (A)

Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Robin M Murray (RM)

Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; and Department of Psychiatry, Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

Marta Di Forti (M)

Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Peter B Jones (PB)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Gillian A Doody (GA)

Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

David Shiers (D)

School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK; Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK; and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Gabrielle Andrews (G)

St George's Hospital, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, UK.

Abbie Milner (A)

Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK.

Maria Antonietta Nettis (MA)

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Andrew J Lawrence (AJ)

Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Danielle A van der Windt (DA)

Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK.

Richard D Riley (RD)

Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK.

Classifications MeSH