Efficacy of Vaccination and Revaccination Against Hepatitis B Virus Using 2 Different Strategies in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Crohn’s disease hepatitis B immune response inflammatory bowel disease ulcerative colitis vaccination

Journal

Inflammatory bowel diseases
ISSN: 1536-4844
Titre abrégé: Inflamm Bowel Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9508162

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 24 06 2024
medline: 5 8 2024
pubmed: 5 8 2024
entrez: 5 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exhibit an increased risk for acquiring hepatitis B virus (HBV), thus they should be vaccinated preferably, if not already infected or immunized. We assessed the efficacy of HBV vaccination in IBD patients and impact of different factors on the immune response. We also evaluated the success rate of 2 different revaccination strategies in the nonresponders. This was a retrospective observational cohort study carried out in 5 tertiary centers. All patients were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen, antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen. Patients tested negative and underwent the standard schedule with 20 µg at 0, 1, and 6 months. Nonresponders (anti-HBs <10 IU/L) were offered a revaccination scheme with either 3 doses of 40 µg at 0, 1, and 6 months or an accelerated scheme with 20 µg at 0, 1, and 2 months. A total of 409 patients were included, and 273 (66.7%) of those (females: 49.5%; Crohn's disease [CD]: 56.7%) responded to baseline vaccination. A total of 189 (69.2%) of 273 (females: 48.1%; CD: 60.3%) developed anti-HBs >100 IU/L. Body mass index <30 kg/m2 (P = .017) was positively associated, while diagnosis of CD (P = .013), extensive UC (P <.0001), extraintestinal manifestations (P = .001), and treatment with immunomodulators/anti-tumor necrosis factor (P < .00) negatively affected the response. Revaccination was offered to 103 patients, and 58.3% of them achieved anti-HBs >10 IU/L. Both revaccination strategies were equally effective. IBD patients demonstrate lower response to HBV vaccination compared with the general population. Age, body mass index, type, disease activity, and immunosuppression negatively affect the response. Half of nonresponders may benefit from an enhanced revaccination attempt. In this retrospective study, we addressed the impact of several factors on the immune response postvaccination against hepatitis B virus in a large cohort of >400 inflammatory bowel disease patients and compared the effectiveness of 2 different revaccination strategies on nonresponders.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exhibit an increased risk for acquiring hepatitis B virus (HBV), thus they should be vaccinated preferably, if not already infected or immunized. We assessed the efficacy of HBV vaccination in IBD patients and impact of different factors on the immune response. We also evaluated the success rate of 2 different revaccination strategies in the nonresponders.
METHODS METHODS
This was a retrospective observational cohort study carried out in 5 tertiary centers. All patients were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen, antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen. Patients tested negative and underwent the standard schedule with 20 µg at 0, 1, and 6 months. Nonresponders (anti-HBs <10 IU/L) were offered a revaccination scheme with either 3 doses of 40 µg at 0, 1, and 6 months or an accelerated scheme with 20 µg at 0, 1, and 2 months.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 409 patients were included, and 273 (66.7%) of those (females: 49.5%; Crohn's disease [CD]: 56.7%) responded to baseline vaccination. A total of 189 (69.2%) of 273 (females: 48.1%; CD: 60.3%) developed anti-HBs >100 IU/L. Body mass index <30 kg/m2 (P = .017) was positively associated, while diagnosis of CD (P = .013), extensive UC (P <.0001), extraintestinal manifestations (P = .001), and treatment with immunomodulators/anti-tumor necrosis factor (P < .00) negatively affected the response. Revaccination was offered to 103 patients, and 58.3% of them achieved anti-HBs >10 IU/L. Both revaccination strategies were equally effective.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
IBD patients demonstrate lower response to HBV vaccination compared with the general population. Age, body mass index, type, disease activity, and immunosuppression negatively affect the response. Half of nonresponders may benefit from an enhanced revaccination attempt.
In this retrospective study, we addressed the impact of several factors on the immune response postvaccination against hepatitis B virus in a large cohort of >400 inflammatory bowel disease patients and compared the effectiveness of 2 different revaccination strategies on nonresponders.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
In this retrospective study, we addressed the impact of several factors on the immune response postvaccination against hepatitis B virus in a large cohort of >400 inflammatory bowel disease patients and compared the effectiveness of 2 different revaccination strategies on nonresponders.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39102755
pii: 7727662
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izae173
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Panagiotis Markopoulos (P)

Department of Gastroenterology, Metaxa Memorial Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.

Konstantinos Karmiris (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece.

Ioannis Dimas (I)

Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece.

Evangelos Voudoukis (E)

Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece.

Spyridon Siakavellas (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Athens LAIKO, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Georgios Axiaris (G)

Department of Gastroenterology, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Eirini Zacharopoulou (E)

Department of Gastroenterology, Agios Panteleimon General Hospital, Nikaia, Piraeus - Agia Varvara General Hospital of Western Attica, Athens, Greece.

Evanthia Zampeli (E)

Department of Gastroenterology, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Eftychia Tsironi (E)

Department of Gastroenterology, Metaxa Memorial Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.

Maria Tzouvala (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Agios Panteleimon General Hospital, Nikaia, Piraeus - Agia Varvara General Hospital of Western Attica, Athens, Greece.

Georgios Papatheodoridis (G)

Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Athens LAIKO, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Georgios Bamias (G)

Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Athens LAIKO, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
GI Unit, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Sotiria General Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Classifications MeSH