Translation of monosynaptic circuits underlying amygdala fMRI neurofeedback training.
Journal
Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology
ISSN: 1740-634X
Titre abrégé: Neuropsychopharmacology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8904907
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Aug 2024
05 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
04
06
2024
accepted:
23
07
2024
revised:
16
07
2024
medline:
6
8
2024
pubmed:
6
8
2024
entrez:
5
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
fMRI neurofeedback using autobiographical memory recall to upregulate the amygdala is associated with resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) changes between the amygdala and the salience and default mode networks (SN and DMN, respectively). We hypothesize the existence of anatomical circuits underlying these rsFC changes. Using a cross-species brain parcellation, we identified in non-human primates locations homologous to the regions of interest (ROIs) from studies showing pre-to-post-neurofeedback changes in rsFC with the left amygdala. We injected bidirectional tracers in the basolateral, lateral, and central amygdala nuclei of adult macaques and used bright- and dark-field microscopy to identify cells and axon terminals in each ROI (SN: anterior cingulate, ventrolateral, and insular cortices; DMN: temporal pole, middle frontal gyrus, angular gyrus, precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, parahippocampal gyrus, hippocampus, and thalamus). We also performed additional injections in specific ROIs to validate the results following amygdala injections and delineate potential disynaptic pathways. Finally, we used high-resolution diffusion MRI data from four post-mortem macaque brains and one in vivo human brain to translate our findings to the neuroimaging domain. Different amygdala nuclei had significant monosynaptic connections with all the SN and DMN ipsilateral ROIs. Amygdala connections with the DMN contralateral ROIs are disynaptic through the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus. Diffusion MRI in both species benefitted from using the ground-truth tracer data to validate its findings, as we identified false-negative ipsilateral and false-positive contralateral connectivity results. This study provides the foundation for future causal investigations of amygdala neurofeedback modulation of the SN and DMN through these anatomic connections.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39103495
doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01944-w
pii: 10.1038/s41386-024-01944-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ID : K99-MH130648
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ID : P50-MH106435
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ID : R01-MH045573
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
ID : R01-EB021265
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
ID : R01-EB021265
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
ID : R01-EB021265
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
ID : R01-NS119911
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
ID : R01-NS119911
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
ID : R01-NS119911
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, Haller S, Scharnowski F, Lewis-Peacock J, et al. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18:86–100.
pubmed: 28003656
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.164
Thibault RT, MacPherson A, Lifshitz M, Roth RR, Raz A. Neurofeedback with fMRI: a critical systematic review. Neuroimage. 2018;172:786–807.
pubmed: 29288868
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.071
Dudek E, Dodell-Feder D. The efficacy of real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback for psychiatric illness: a meta-analysis of brain and behavioral outcomes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;121:291–306.
pubmed: 33370575
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.020
Tursic A, Eck J, Luhrs M, Linden DEJ, Goebel R. A systematic review of fMRI neurofeedback reporting and effects in clinical populations. Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102496.
pubmed: 33395987
pmcid: 7724376
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102496
Yuan H, Young KD, Phillips R, Zotev V, Misaki M, Bodurka J. Resting-state functional connectivity modulation and sustained changes after real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback training in depression. Brain Connect. 2014;4:690–701.
pubmed: 25329241
pmcid: 4238245
doi: 10.1089/brain.2014.0262
Rance M, Walsh C, Sukhodolsky DG, Pittman B, Qiu M, Kichuk SA, et al. Time course of clinical change following neurofeedback. Neuroimage. 2018;181:807–13.
pubmed: 29729393
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.001
Linhartova P, Latalova A, Kosa B, Kasparek T, Schmahl C, Paret C. fMRI neurofeedback in emotion regulation: a literature review. Neuroimage. 2019;193:75–92.
pubmed: 30862532
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.011
Goldway N, Jalon I, Keynan JN, Hellrung L, Horstmann A, Paret C, et al. Feasibility and utility of amygdala neurofeedback. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;138:104694.
pubmed: 35623447
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104694
Zotev V, Phillips R, Young KD, Drevets WC, Bodurka J. Prefrontal control of the amygdala during real-time fMRI neurofeedback training of emotion regulation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e79184.
pubmed: 24223175
pmcid: 3819266
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079184
Nicholson AA, Rabellino D, Densmore M, Frewen PA, Paret C, Kluetsch R, et al. The neurobiology of emotion regulation in posttraumatic stress disorder: amygdala downregulation via real-time fMRI neurofeedback. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38:541–60.
pubmed: 27647695
doi: 10.1002/hbm.23402
Zotev V, Krueger F, Phillips R, Alvarez RP, Simmons WK, Bellgowan P, et al. Self-regulation of amygdala activation using real-time FMRI neurofeedback. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24522.
pubmed: 21931738
pmcid: 3169601
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024522
Young KD, Siegle GJ, Misaki M, Zotev V, Phillips R, Drevets WC, et al. Altered task-based and resting-state amygdala functional connectivity following real-time fMRI amygdala neurofeedback training in major depressive disorder. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;17:691–703.
pubmed: 29270356
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.004
Aggleton JP, Mishkin M. Projections of the amygdala to the thalamus in the cynomolgus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1984;222:56–68.
pubmed: 6321564
doi: 10.1002/cne.902220106
Aggleton JP. A description of the amygdalo-hippocampal interconnections in the macaque monkey. Exp Brain Res. 1986;64:515–26.
pubmed: 3803489
doi: 10.1007/BF00340489
Aggleton JP, Wright NF, Rosene DL, Saunders RC. Complementary patterns of direct amygdala and hippocampal projections to the macaque prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25:4351–73.
pubmed: 25715284
pmcid: 4612443
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv019
Amaral DG, Price JL. Amygdalo-cortical projections in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis). J Comp Neurol. 1984;230:465–96.
pubmed: 6520247
doi: 10.1002/cne.902300402
Amaral DG, Insausti R. Retrograde transport of D-[3H]-aspartate injected into the monkey amygdaloid complex. Exp Brain Res. 1992;88:375–88.
pubmed: 1374347
doi: 10.1007/BF02259113
Baizer JS, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. Comparison of subcortical connections of inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in monkeys. Vis Neurosci. 1993;10:59–72.
pubmed: 8424928
doi: 10.1017/S0952523800003229
Barbas H, de Olmos J. Projections from the amygdala to basoventral and mediodorsal prefrontal regions in the Rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1990;300:549–71.
pubmed: 2273093
doi: 10.1002/cne.903000409
Carmichael ST, Price JL. Limbic connections of the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex in macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 1995;363:615–41.
pubmed: 8847421
doi: 10.1002/cne.903630408
Elorette C, Forcelli PA, Saunders RC, Malkova L. Colocalization of tectal inputs with amygdala-projecting neurons in the macaque pulvinar. Front Neural Circuits. 2018;12:91.
pubmed: 30405362
pmcid: 6207581
doi: 10.3389/fncir.2018.00091
Ghashghaei HT, Barbas H. Pathways for emotion: interactions of prefrontal and anterior temporal pathways in the amygdala of the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience. 2002;115:1261–79.
pubmed: 12453496
doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00446-3
Kelly EA, Thomas VK, Indraghanty A, Fudge JL Perigenual and subgenual anterior cingulate afferents converge on common pyramidal cells in amygdala subregions of the macaque. J Neurosci. 2021;41:9742–55.
Kim Y, Sakata H, Nejime M, Konoike N, Miyachi S, Nakamura K. Afferent connections of the dorsal, perigenual, and subgenual anterior cingulate cortices of the monkey: amygdalar inputs and intrinsic connections. Neurosci Lett. 2018;681:93–9.
pubmed: 29803854
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.05.028
Romanski LM, Giguere M, Bates JF, Goldman-Rakic PS. Topographic organization of medial pulvinar connections with the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1997;379:313–32.
pubmed: 9067827
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970317)379:3<313::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-6
Saunders RC, Rosene DL, Van Hoesen GW. Comparison of the efferents of the amygdala and the hippocampal formation in the rhesus monkey: II. Reciprocal and non-reciprocal connections. J Comp Neurol. 1988;271:185–207.
pubmed: 2454247
doi: 10.1002/cne.902710203
Sharma KK, Kelly EA, Pfeifer CW, Fudge JL. Translating fear circuitry: amygdala projections to subgenual and perigenual anterior cingulate in the macaque. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30:550–62.
pubmed: 31219571
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz106
Stefanacci L, Suzuki WA, Amaral DG. Organization of connections between the amygdaloid complex and the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 1996;375:552–82.
pubmed: 8930786
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19961125)375:4<552::AID-CNE2>3.0.CO;2-0
Stefanacci L, Amaral DG. Topographic organization of cortical inputs to the lateral nucleus of the macaque monkey amygdala: a retrograde tracing study. J Comp Neurol. 2000;421:52–79.
pubmed: 10813772
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000522)421:1<52::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-O
Stefanacci L, Amaral DG. Some observations on cortical inputs to the macaque monkey amygdala: an anterograde tracing study. J Comp Neurol. 2002;451:301–23.
pubmed: 12210126
doi: 10.1002/cne.10339
Buckwalter J, Schumann C, Van Hoesen G. Evidence for direct projections from the basal nucleus of the amygdala to retrosplenial cortex in the Macaque monkey. Exp Brain Res. 2008;186:47–57.
pubmed: 18049816
doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1203-x
Haber SN, Wolfe DP, Groenewegen HJ. The relationship between ventral striatal efferent fibers and the distribution of peptide-positive woolly fibers in the forebrain of the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience. 1990;39:323–38.
pubmed: 1708114
doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(90)90271-5
Fudge JL, Kunishio K, Walsh P, Richard C, Haber SN. Amygdaloid projections to ventromedial striatal subterritories in the primate. Neuroscience. 2002;110:257–75.
pubmed: 11958868
doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00546-2
Fudge JL, Breitbart MA, McClain C. Amygdaloid inputs define a caudal component of the ventral striatum in primates. J Comp Neurol. 2004;476:330–47.
pubmed: 15282709
pmcid: 2424286
doi: 10.1002/cne.20228
Misaki M, Phillips R, Zotev V, Wong CK, Wurfel BE, Krueger F, et al. Real-time fMRI amygdala neurofeedback positive emotional training normalized resting-state functional connectivity in combat veterans with and without PTSD: a connectome-wide investigation. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;20:543–55.
pubmed: 30175041
pmcid: 6118041
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.08.025
Lancaster JL, Tordesillas‐Gutiérrez D, Martinez M, Salinas F, Evans A, Zilles K, et al. Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM‐152 brain template. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;28:1194–205.
pubmed: 17266101
pmcid: 6871323
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20345
Kotter R, Wanke E. Mapping brains without coordinates. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360:751–66.
pubmed: 15971361
pmcid: 1569487
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1625
Paxinos G, Huang XF, Toga AW The rhesus monkey brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press: San Diego, CA; 2000.
Mai J, Paxinos G, Voss T Atlas of the Human Brain. Elsevier; 2008.
Petrides M Atlas of the morphology of the human cerebral cortex on the average MNI brain. Academic Press; 2018.
Choi EY, Tanimura Y, Vage PR, Yates EH, Haber SN. Convergence of prefrontal and parietal anatomical projections in a connectional hub in the striatum. Neuroimage. 2017;146:821–32.
pubmed: 27646127
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.037
Tang W, Jbabdi S, Zhu Z, Cottaar M, Grisot G, Lehman JF, et al. A connectional hub in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex links areas of emotion and cognitive control. Elife. 2019;8:e43761.
Trambaiolli LR, Peng X, Lehman JF, Linn G, Russ BE, Schroeder CE, et al. Anatomical and functional connectivity support the existence of a salience network node within the caudal ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Elife. 2022;11:e736344.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.76334
Saleem KS, Avram AV, Glen D, Yen CC-C, Frank QY, Komlosh M, et al. High-resolution mapping and digital atlas of subcortical regions in the macaque monkey based on matched MAP-MRI and histology. Neuroimage. 2021;245:118759.
pubmed: 34838750
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118759
Wang F, Dong Z, Tian Q, Liao C, Fan Q, Hoge WS, et al. In vivo human whole-brain Connectom diffusion MRI dataset at 760 µm isotropic resolution. Sci Data. 2021;8:1–12.
doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00904-z
Young KD, Zotev V, Phillips R, Misaki M, Yuan H, Drevets WC, et al. Real-time FMRI neurofeedback training of amygdala activity in patients with major depressive disorder. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e88785.
pubmed: 24523939
pmcid: 3921228
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088785
Liu N, Yao L, Zhao X. Evaluating the amygdala network induced by neurofeedback training for emotion regulation using hierarchical clustering. Brain Res. 2020;1740:146853.
pubmed: 32339500
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146853
Misaki M, Mulyana B, Zotev V, Wurfel BE, Krueger F, Feldner M, et al. Hippocampal volume recovery with real-time functional MRI amygdala neurofeedback emotional training for posttraumatic stress disorder. J Affect Disord. 2021;283:229–35.
pubmed: 33561804
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.058
Young KD, Zotev V, Phillips R, Misaki M, Drevets WC, Bodurka J. Amygdala real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback for major depressive disorder: a review. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018;72:466–81.
pubmed: 29687527
pmcid: 6035103
doi: 10.1111/pcn.12665
Petrides M, Tomaiuolo F, Yeterian EH, Pandya DN. The prefrontal cortex: comparative architectonic organization in the human and the macaque monkey brains. Cortex. 2012;48:46–57.
pubmed: 21872854
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.07.002
Goulas A, Bastiani M, Bezgin G, Uylings HB, Roebroeck A, Stiers P. Comparative analysis of the macroscale structural connectivity in the macaque and human brain. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10:e1003529.
pubmed: 24676052
pmcid: 3967942
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003529
Touroutoglou A, Bliss-Moreau E, Zhang J, Mantini D, Vanduffel W, Dickerson BC, et al. A ventral salience network in the macaque brain. Neuroimage. 2016;132:190–7.
pubmed: 26899785
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.029
Mantini D, Gerits A, Nelissen K, Durand JB, Joly O, Simone L, et al. Default mode of brain function in monkeys. J Neurosci. 2011;31:12954–62.
pubmed: 21900574
pmcid: 3686636
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2318-11.2011
Vincent JL, Patel GH, Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Baker JT, Van Essen DC, et al. Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain. Nature. 2007;447:83–6.
pubmed: 17476267
doi: 10.1038/nature05758
Porrino LJ, Crane AM, Goldman-Rakic PS. Direct and indirect pathways from the amygdala to the frontal lobe in rhesus monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 1981;198:121–36.
pubmed: 6164704
doi: 10.1002/cne.901980111
Hoffman KL, Gothard KM, Schmid MC, Logothetis NK. Facial-expression and gaze-selective responses in the monkey amygdala. Curr Biol. 2007;17:766–72.
pubmed: 17412586
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.040
Gothard KM, Battaglia FP, Erickson CA, Spitler KM, Amaral DG. Neural responses to facial expression and face identity in the monkey amygdala. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:1671–83.
pubmed: 17093126
doi: 10.1152/jn.00714.2006
Dal Monte O, Costa VD, Noble PL, Murray EA, Averbeck BB. Amygdala lesions in rhesus macaques decrease attention to threat. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10161.
pubmed: 26658670
doi: 10.1038/ncomms10161
Shi S, Xu AG, Rui YY, Zhang X, Romanski LM, Gothard KM, et al. Infrared neural stimulation with 7T fMRI: A rapid in vivo method for mapping cortical connections of primate amygdala. Neuroimage. 2021;231:117818.
pubmed: 33548458
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117818
Royet JP, Zald D, Versace R, Costes N, Lavenne F, Koenig O, et al. Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant olfactory, visual, and auditory stimuli: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci. 2000;20:7752–9.
pubmed: 11027238
pmcid: 6772882
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-20-07752.2000
Sergerie K, Chochol C, Armony JL. The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32:811–30.
pubmed: 18316124
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.12.002
Anderson AK, Phelps EA. Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature. 2001;411:305–9.
pubmed: 11357132
doi: 10.1038/35077083
Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio H, Damasio AR. Fear and the human amygdala. J Neurosci. 1995;15:5879–91.
pubmed: 7666173
pmcid: 6577662
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-09-05879.1995
Graham R, Devinsky O, Labar KS. Quantifying deficits in the perception of fear and anger in morphed facial expressions after bilateral amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45:42–54.
pubmed: 16806315
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.021
Fox AS, Oler JA, Shelton SE, Nanda SA, Davidson RJ, Roseboom PH, et al. Central amygdala nucleus (Ce) gene expression linked to increased trait-like Ce metabolism and anxious temperament in young primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:18108–13.
pubmed: 23071305
pmcid: 3497741
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206723109
Roseboom PH, Nanda SA, Fox AS, Oler JA, Shackman AJ, Shelton SE, et al. Neuropeptide Y receptor gene expression in the primate amygdala predicts anxious temperament and brain metabolism. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;76:850–7.
pubmed: 24342924
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.11.012
Kalin NH, Shelton SE, Davidson RJ. The role of the central nucleus of the amygdala in mediating fear and anxiety in the primate. J Neurosci. 2004;24:5506–15.
pubmed: 15201323
pmcid: 6729317
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0292-04.2004
Amaral DG, Price JL, Pitkanen A, Carmichael ST Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex. The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory, and Mental Dysfunction. Wiley-Liss, Inc.; 1992. 1–66.
Davis M. The role of the amygdala in fear and anxiety. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1992;15:353–75.
pubmed: 1575447
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.15.030192.002033
Feurer C, Jimmy J, Chang F, Langenecker SA, Phan KL, Ajilore O, et al. Resting state functional connectivity correlates of rumination and worry in internalizing psychopathologies. Depress Anxiety. 2021;38:488–97.
pubmed: 33621397
pmcid: 8085064
doi: 10.1002/da.23142
Demeter S, Rosene DL, Van Hoesen GW. Fields of origin and pathways of the interhemispheric commissures in the temporal lobe of macaques. J Comp Neurol. 1990;302:29–53.
pubmed: 2086614
doi: 10.1002/cne.903020104
Demeter S, Rosene DL, Van Hoesen GW. Interhemispheric pathways of the hippocampal formation, presubiculum, and entorhinal and posterior parahippocampal cortices in the rhesus monkey: The structure and organization of the hippocampal commissures. J Comp Neurol. 1985;233:30–47.
pubmed: 3980771
doi: 10.1002/cne.902330104
Aggleton JP, Desimone R, Mishkin M. The origin, course, and termination of the hippocampothalamic projections in the macaque. J Comp Neurol. 1986;243:409–21.
pubmed: 3512627
doi: 10.1002/cne.902430310
Mathiasen ML, Louch RC, Nelson AD, Dillingham CM, Aggleton JP. Trajectory of hippocampal fibres to the contralateral anterior thalamus and mammillary bodies in rats, mice, and macaque monkeys. Brain Neurosci Adv. 2019;3:2398212819871205.
pubmed: 31588413
pmcid: 6712910
doi: 10.1177/2398212819871205
Zhu Y, Gao H, Tong L, Li Z, Wang L, Zhang C, et al. Emotion regulation of hippocampus using real-time fMRI neurofeedback in healthy human. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:242.
pubmed: 31379539
pmcid: 6660260
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00242
Paret C, Kluetsch R, Zaehringer J, Ruf M, Demirakca T, Bohus M, et al. Alterations of amygdala-prefrontal connectivity with real-time fMRI neurofeedback in BPD patients. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016;11:952–60.
pubmed: 26833918
pmcid: 4884315
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw016
Paret C, Kluetsch R, Ruf M, Demirakca T, Hoesterey S, Ende G, et al. Down-regulation of amygdala activation with real-time fMRI neurofeedback in a healthy female sample. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:299.
pubmed: 25278851
pmcid: 4166899
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00299
Keynan JN, Cohen A, Jackont G, Green N, Goldway N, Davidov A, et al. Electrical fingerprint of the amygdala guides neurofeedback training for stress resilience. Nat Hum Behav. 2019;3:63–73.
pubmed: 30932053
doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0484-3
Young KD, Siegle GJ, Zotev V, Phillips R, Misaki M, Yuan H, et al. Randomized clinical trial of real-time fMRI amygdala neurofeedback for major depressive disorder: effects on symptoms and autobiographical memory recall. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174:748–55.
pubmed: 28407727
pmcid: 5538952
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16060637
Zotev V, Phillips R, Misaki M, Wong CK, Wurfel BE, Krueger F, et al. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback training of the amygdala activity with simultaneous EEG in veterans with combat-related PTSD. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;19:106–21.
pubmed: 30035008
pmcid: 6051473
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.010
Kvamme TL, Ros T, Overgaard M. Can neurofeedback provide evidence of direct brain-behavior causality? Neuroimage. 2022;258:119400.
pubmed: 35728786
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119400
Ghashghaei HT, Hilgetag CC, Barbas H. Sequence of information processing for emotions based on the anatomic dialogue between prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Neuroimage. 2007;34:905–23.
pubmed: 17126037
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.046
Folloni D, Verhagen L, Mars RB, Fouragnan E, Constans C, Aubry JF, et al. Manipulation of subcortical and deep cortical activity in the primate brain using transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation. Neuron. 2019;101:1109–16.e5.
pubmed: 30765166
pmcid: 6520498
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.019
Chou T, Deckersbach T, Guerin B, Wong KS, Borron BM, Kanabar A, et al. Transcranial focused ultrasound of the amygdala modulates fear network activation and connectivity. Brain Stimul. 2024;17:312–20.
Huang X, Huang P, Li D, Zhang Y, Wang T, Mu J, et al. Early brain changes associated with psychotherapy in major depressive disorder revealed by resting-state fMRI: evidence for the top-down regulation theory. Int J Psychophysiol. 2014;94:437–44.
pubmed: 25448375
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.10.011
Compère L, Siegle GJ, Riley E, Lazzaro S, Strege M, Pacoe E, et al. Enhanced efficacy of CBT following augmentation with amygdala rtfMRI neurofeedback in depression. J Affect Disord. 2023;339:495–501.
pubmed: 37459978
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.07.063
Haber SN, Tang W, Choi EY, Yendiki A, Liu H, Jbabdi S, et al. Circuits, networks, and neuropsychiatric disease: transitioning from anatomy to imaging. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;87:318–27.
pubmed: 31870495
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.10.024
Keizer K, Kuypers HG. Distribution of corticospinal neurons with collaterals to the lower brain stem reticular formation in monkey (Macaca fascicularis). Exp Brain Res. 1989;74:311–8.
pubmed: 2924851
doi: 10.1007/BF00248864
Lanciego JL, Wouterlood FG. Neuroanatomical tract-tracing techniques that did go viral. Brain Struct Funct. 2020;225:1193–224.
pubmed: 32062721
pmcid: 7271020
doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02041-6
Maffei C, Wang S, Haber S, Yendiki A Submillimeter dMRI protocol optimization for accurate in-vivo reconstruction of deep-brain circuitry. Proc Intl Soc Mag Res Med. 2022;30:160.
Grisot G, Haber SN, Yendiki A. Diffusion MRI and anatomic tracing in the same brain reveal common failure modes of tractography. Neuroimage. 2021;239:118300.
pubmed: 34171498
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118300
Maffei C, Girard G, Schilling KG, Aydogan DB, Adluru N, Zhylka A, et al. Insights from the IronTract challenge: Optimal methods for mapping brain pathways from multi-shell diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2022;257:119327.
pubmed: 35636227
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119327
Lehman JF, Greenberg BD, McIntyre CC, Rasmussen SA, Haber SN. Rules ventral prefrontal cortical axons use to reach their targets: implications for diffusion tensor imaging tractography and deep brain stimulation for psychiatric illness. J Neurosci. 2011;31:10392–402.
pubmed: 21753016
pmcid: 3445013
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0595-11.2011
Nauta WJH. Fibre degeneration following lesions of the amygdaloid complex in the monkey. J Anat. 1961;95:515–31.
pubmed: 14478601
pmcid: 1244065
Jbabdi S, Lehman JF, Haber SN, Behrens TE. Human and monkey ventral prefrontal fibers use the same organizational principles to reach their targets: tracing versus tractography. J Neurosci. 2013;33:3190–201.
pubmed: 23407972
pmcid: 3602794
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2457-12.2013
Kwon HG, Byun WM, Ahn SH, Son SM, Jang SH. The anatomical characteristics of the stria terminalis in the human brain: a diffusion tensor tractography study. Neurosci Lett. 2011;500:99–102.
pubmed: 21704121
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.06.013
Kamali A, Yousem DM, Lin DD, Sair HI, Jasti SP, Keser Z, et al. Mapping the trajectory of the stria terminalis of the human limbic system using high spatial resolution diffusion tensor tractography. Neurosci Lett. 2015;608:45–50.
pubmed: 26434353
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.09.035
Yendiki A, Aggarwal M, Axer M, Howard AFD, van Walsum AVC, Haber SN. Post mortem mapping of connectional anatomy for the validation of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2022;256:119146.
pubmed: 35346838
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119146
Chauvière L, Singer W. Neurofeedback training of gamma oscillations in monkey primary visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2019;29:4785–802.
pubmed: 30796824
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz013
Scangos KW, Khambhati AN, Daly PM, Makhoul GS, Sugrue LP, Zamanian H, et al. Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression. Nat Med. 2021;27:1696–700.
pubmed: 34608328
pmcid: 11219029
doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01480-w
Friston K, Moran R, Seth AK. Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23:172–78.
pubmed: 23265964
pmcid: 3925802
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.010
Koush Y, Meskaldji D-E, Pichon S, Rey G, Rieger SW, Linden DE, et al. Learning control over emotion networks through connectivity-based neurofeedback. Cereb Cortex. 2015;27:1193–202.
Weiss F, Zamoscik V, Schmidt SN, Halli P, Kirsch P, Gerchen MF. Just a very expensive breathing training? Risk of respiratory artifacts in functional connectivity-based real-time fMRI neurofeedback. Neuroimage. 2020;210:116580.
pubmed: 31987998
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116580