Role of CDK4 as prognostic biomarker in Soft Tissue Sarcoma and synergistic effect of its inhibition in dedifferentiated liposarcoma sequential treatment.
Journal
Experimental hematology & oncology
ISSN: 2162-3619
Titre abrégé: Exp Hematol Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101590676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Aug 2024
05 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
14
03
2024
accepted:
12
07
2024
medline:
6
8
2024
pubmed:
6
8
2024
entrez:
5
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Soft tissue sarcomas represent an heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal tumors comprising 1% of all solid malignancies. Among them, liposarcoma is one of the most common histotypes with atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS) as the major sub-entities. The unavailability of predictive, prognostic and druggable biomarkers makes the management of these lesions challenging. In recent years CDK4 and its inhibitors have emerged as potential agents for these lesions especially for ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS but the results are not conclusive and need to be elucidated. This study involved 21 ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS patients. Histological analyses of MDM2 and CDK4 were carried out. Moreover, a DDLPS patient-derived cancer model was established in vitro and in vivo assessing the efficacy of palbociclib in combination and sequential treatment. Finally, in silico analyses on CDK4 expression were carried out. The results showed a higher expression of CDK4 and MDM2 in DDLPS compared to ALT/WDLPS. Moreover, no correlation between MDM2 expression and CDK4 was observed. Next, in vitro analysis of CDK4 inhibitor palbociclib showed an antagonistic effect when combined to other chemotherapeutics, while it exhibited a significant synergy when administered in sequential schedule with lenvatinib. Next, in vivo analysis on DDLPS xenotransplanted embryos assessing the efficacy and safety profile of the in vitro tested schedules confirmed the observed data. This proof-of-concept study sheds light on the natural history of ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS and provides the rationale for the clinical applicability of sequential treatment with palbociclib in the management of DDLPS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39103896
doi: 10.1186/s40164-024-00540-4
pii: 10.1186/s40164-024-00540-4
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Pagination
74Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
WHO Classification of Tumours. In. Soft tissue and Bone. 5th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2020.
Saâda-Bouzid E, Burel-Vandenbos F, Ranchère-Vince D, Birtwisle-Peyrottes I, Chetaille B, Bouvier C, et al. Prognostic value of HMGA2, CDK4, and JUN amplification in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas. Mod Pathol. 2015;28:1404–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2015.96 .
doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.96
pubmed: 26336885
Aleixo PB, Hartmann AA, Menezes IC, Meurer RT, Oliveira AM. Can MDM2 and CDK4 make the diagnosis of well differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma? An immunohistochemical study on 129 soft tissue tumours. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62:1127–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2009.070201 .
doi: 10.1136/jcp.2009.070201
pubmed: 19946100
Binh MB, Sastre-Garau X, Guillou L, de Pinieux G, Terrier P, Lagacé R, et al. MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings are useful adjuncts in diagnosing well differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma subtypes: a comparative analysis of 559 soft tissue neoplasms with genetic data. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1340–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000170343.09562.39 .
doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000170343.09562.39
pubmed: 16160477
Lee SE, Kim YJ, Kwon MJ, Choi DI, Lee J, Cho J, et al. High level of CDK4 amplification is a poor prognostic factor in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Histol Histopathol. 2014;29:127–38. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-29.127 .
doi: 10.14670/HH-29.127
pubmed: 23852861
Abdul Razak AR, Bauer S, Suarez C, Lin CC, Quek R, Hütter-Krönke ML, et al. Co-targeting of MDM2 and CDK4/6 with Siremadlin and Ribociclib for the treatment of patients with Well-differentiated or dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: results from a proof-of-Concept, phase ib study. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:1087–97. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-129 .
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-129
pubmed: 34921024
Nassif EF, Cope B, Traweek R, Witt RG, Erstad DJ, Scally CP, et al. Real-world use of palbociclib monotherapy in retroperitoneal liposarcomas at a large volume sarcoma center. Int J Cancer. 2022;150:2012–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33956 .
doi: 10.1002/ijc.33956
pubmed: 35128664
Dickson MA, Schwartz GK, Keohan ML, D’Angelo SP, Gounder MM, Chi P, et al. Progression-free survival among patients with Well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma treated with CDK4 inhibitor palbociclib: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:937–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0264 .
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0264
pubmed: 27124835
pmcid: 4991028
Selby LV, Clark EC, Liebner DA, Chen JL, Tinoco G, Bashian E, et al. Adjuvant Palbociclib May be Associated with delayed recurrence in completely resected retroperitoneal liposarcoma: results of a single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13692-0 . [Online ahead of print].
doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13692-0
pubmed: 37330448
Al-Hamaly MA, Turner LT, Rivera-Martinez A, Rodriguez A, Blackburn JS. Zebrafish Cancer avatars: a translational platform for analyzing Tumor Heterogeneity and Predicting patient outcomes. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3):2288.
doi: 10.3390/ijms24032288
pubmed: 36768609
pmcid: 9916713