Metabolomic prediction of breast cancer treatment induced neurological and metabolic toxicities.


Journal

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Aug 2024
Historique:
accepted: 01 08 2024
received: 17 01 2024
revised: 04 05 2024
medline: 6 8 2024
pubmed: 6 8 2024
entrez: 6 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Long-term treatment-related toxicities, such as neurological and metabolic toxicities, are major issues in breast cancer. We investigated the interest of metabolomic profiling to predict toxicities. Untargeted high-resolution metabolomic profiles of 992 patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer from the prospective CANTO cohort were acquired (n=1935 metabolites). A residual-based modeling strategy with a discovery and validation cohort was used to benchmark machine learning algorithms, taking into account confounding variables. Adaptive LASSO has a good predictive performance, has limited optimism bias, and allows the selection of metabolites of interest for future translational research. The addition of low-frequency metabolites and non-annotated metabolites increases the predictive power. Metabolomics adds extra performance to clinical variables to predict various neurological and metabolic toxicity profiles. Untargeted high-resolution metabolomics allows better toxicity prediction by considering environmental exposure, metabolites linked to microbiota, and low-frequency metabolites.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Long-term treatment-related toxicities, such as neurological and metabolic toxicities, are major issues in breast cancer. We investigated the interest of metabolomic profiling to predict toxicities.
METHODS METHODS
Untargeted high-resolution metabolomic profiles of 992 patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer from the prospective CANTO cohort were acquired (n=1935 metabolites). A residual-based modeling strategy with a discovery and validation cohort was used to benchmark machine learning algorithms, taking into account confounding variables.
RESULTS RESULTS
Adaptive LASSO has a good predictive performance, has limited optimism bias, and allows the selection of metabolites of interest for future translational research. The addition of low-frequency metabolites and non-annotated metabolites increases the predictive power. Metabolomics adds extra performance to clinical variables to predict various neurological and metabolic toxicity profiles.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Untargeted high-resolution metabolomics allows better toxicity prediction by considering environmental exposure, metabolites linked to microbiota, and low-frequency metabolites.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39106085
pii: 746881
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0195
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Max Piffoux (M)

Hospices Civils de Lyon, lyon, France.

Jérémie Jacquemin (J)

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Mélanie Pétéra (M)

INRAE, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Stephanie Durand (S)

University of Clermont Auvergne, St Genes Champanelle, France.

Angélique Abila (A)

University of Clermont Auvergne, CLERMONT-FERRAND, France.

Delphine Centeno (D)

University of Clermont Auvergne, France.

Charlotte Joly (C)

University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-fd, France.

Bernard Lyan (B)

University of Clermont Auvergne, France.

Sibille Everhard (S)

UniCancer Group, Paris, France.

Sandrine Boyault (S)

Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.

Barbara Pistilli (B)

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Philippe Rouanet (P)

Institut Regional du Cancer de Montpellier, montpellier, France.

Julie Havas (J)

Institut Gustave Roussy, villejuif, France.

Baptiste Sauterey (B)

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, angers, France.

Mario Campone (M)

ICO, Saint-Herblain, France.

Carole Tarpin (C)

Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier (MA)

Centre Jean Perrin, clermont ferrand, France.

Olivier Rigal (O)

Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.

Thierry Petit (T)

Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg, France.

Christine Lasset (C)

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Aurélie Bertaut (A)

Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.

Paul Cottu (P)

Institute Curie, Paris, France.

Fabrice Andre (F)

Institut Gustave Roussy, villejuif, France.

Ines Vaz-Luis (I)

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Estelle Pujos-Guillot (E)

Clermont Auvergne University, INRAE, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Youenn Drouet (Y)

Centre Léon Bérard, Université de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5558 LBBE, Lyon, France.

Olivier Trédan (O)

Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.

Classifications MeSH