Perspectives on physician-assisted suicide in mental healthcare: results of a survey of physicians and medical students.

Depressive disorders ethical perspective medical profession medical survey physician-assisted suicide

Journal

BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 7 8 2024
pubmed: 7 8 2024
entrez: 7 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is typically associated with serious physical illnesses that are prevalent in palliative care. However, individuals with mental illnesses may also experience such severity that life becomes intolerable. In February 2020, the previous German law prohibiting PAS was repealed. Patients with severe mental illnesses are increasingly likely to approach physicians with requests for PAS. To explore the ethical and moral perspectives of medical students and physicians when making individual decisions regarding PAS. An anonymised digital survey was conducted among medical students and physicians in Germany. Participants were presented with a case vignette of a chronically depressed patient requesting PAS. Participants decided on PAS provision and assessed theoretical arguments. We employed generalised ordinal regression and qualitative analysis for data interpretation. A total of Participants displayed relatively low willingness to consider PAS in the case of a chronically depressed patient. This study highlights the substantial influence of theoretical medical-ethical arguments and the broader public discourse, underscoring the necessity of an ethical discussion on PAS for mental illnesses.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is typically associated with serious physical illnesses that are prevalent in palliative care. However, individuals with mental illnesses may also experience such severity that life becomes intolerable. In February 2020, the previous German law prohibiting PAS was repealed. Patients with severe mental illnesses are increasingly likely to approach physicians with requests for PAS.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To explore the ethical and moral perspectives of medical students and physicians when making individual decisions regarding PAS.
METHOD METHODS
An anonymised digital survey was conducted among medical students and physicians in Germany. Participants were presented with a case vignette of a chronically depressed patient requesting PAS. Participants decided on PAS provision and assessed theoretical arguments. We employed generalised ordinal regression and qualitative analysis for data interpretation.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Participants displayed relatively low willingness to consider PAS in the case of a chronically depressed patient. This study highlights the substantial influence of theoretical medical-ethical arguments and the broader public discourse, underscoring the necessity of an ethical discussion on PAS for mental illnesses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39108029
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.731
pii: S2056472424007312
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e141

Auteurs

Rebecca Reichel (R)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Sophia Helen Adam (SH)

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Hans-Jörg Ehni (HJ)

Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Florian Junne (F)

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; and German Center for Mental Health, Magdeburg, Germany.

Anne Herrmann-Werner (A)

Tuebingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; and German Center for Mental Health, Tuebingen, Germany.

Andreas J Fallgatter (AJ)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; and German Center for Mental Health, Tuebingen, Germany.

Stephan Zipfel (S)

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; and German Center for Mental Health, Tuebingen, Germany.

Rebecca Erschens (R)

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH