Perspectives on physician-assisted suicide in mental healthcare: results of a survey of physicians and medical students.
Depressive disorders
ethical perspective
medical profession
medical survey
physician-assisted suicide
Journal
BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Aug 2024
07 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline:
7
8
2024
pubmed:
7
8
2024
entrez:
7
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is typically associated with serious physical illnesses that are prevalent in palliative care. However, individuals with mental illnesses may also experience such severity that life becomes intolerable. In February 2020, the previous German law prohibiting PAS was repealed. Patients with severe mental illnesses are increasingly likely to approach physicians with requests for PAS. To explore the ethical and moral perspectives of medical students and physicians when making individual decisions regarding PAS. An anonymised digital survey was conducted among medical students and physicians in Germany. Participants were presented with a case vignette of a chronically depressed patient requesting PAS. Participants decided on PAS provision and assessed theoretical arguments. We employed generalised ordinal regression and qualitative analysis for data interpretation. A total of Participants displayed relatively low willingness to consider PAS in the case of a chronically depressed patient. This study highlights the substantial influence of theoretical medical-ethical arguments and the broader public discourse, underscoring the necessity of an ethical discussion on PAS for mental illnesses.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is typically associated with serious physical illnesses that are prevalent in palliative care. However, individuals with mental illnesses may also experience such severity that life becomes intolerable. In February 2020, the previous German law prohibiting PAS was repealed. Patients with severe mental illnesses are increasingly likely to approach physicians with requests for PAS.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
To explore the ethical and moral perspectives of medical students and physicians when making individual decisions regarding PAS.
METHOD
METHODS
An anonymised digital survey was conducted among medical students and physicians in Germany. Participants were presented with a case vignette of a chronically depressed patient requesting PAS. Participants decided on PAS provision and assessed theoretical arguments. We employed generalised ordinal regression and qualitative analysis for data interpretation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Participants displayed relatively low willingness to consider PAS in the case of a chronically depressed patient. This study highlights the substantial influence of theoretical medical-ethical arguments and the broader public discourse, underscoring the necessity of an ethical discussion on PAS for mental illnesses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39108029
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.731
pii: S2056472424007312
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng