Case report: A creatine kinase-borg scale values-based approach to tailor physical training in a central core myopathy patient.

Background

Patients with central core myopathy (CCM) can be at risk of exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis and myalgia. Despite its possible positive effects, physical training has been long avoided in these patients as no population-specific exercise adaption strategies have been developed. Here we present the case of a 17-year-old male CCM patient who underwent a 3-month training program tailored to a preliminary test aimed at assessing his physical exertion tolerance measured via changes in serum creatine kinase (CK).

Methods

The preliminary tolerance test consisted of three 25-minute sessions (one session per week) of physical exercise (aerobic, resistance and mixed) at an intensity quantified as level 6 of the Borg Category Ratio (CR) 0-10 scale. A blood sample to assess CK was conducted 36 h following eachsession. The intervention consisted of a training program (three sessions per week) including both resistance and aerobic exercises concomitant with a personalized nutritional plan. Before and after intervention, a battery of metabolic (indirect calorimetry, bioimpedance) and cardiopulmonary (CPET) tests were performed.

Results

After training, improvements of the anaerobic threshold (+6.9%), normalized VO

Conclusion

Our results highlight that a mixed aerobic/resistance training, properly tailored and supported by a specific nutritional plan, may safely improve the physical fitness and body composition in a CCM patient. Dosing exercise-induced CK serum change following Borg CR-10 intensity assessment, may be useful to correctly tailor physical exercise in these patients.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Crisafulli, Lacetera, Bottoni, Berardinelli, Grattarola, Veltroni, Acquadro, Negro, Lavaselli and D’Antona.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.