Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee II for the Optimization of Surgical Education and Training in the United States: The Surgical Trainee Perspective.


Journal

Annals of surgery
ISSN: 1528-1140
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372354

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 7 8 2024
pubmed: 7 8 2024
entrez: 7 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study aims to appraise recommendations from an expert panel of surgical educators on optimizing surgical education and training in the setting of contemporary challenges. The Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC II), a group of surgical educators, was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training considering the current changes in the landscape of surgical education. Surgical trainees were recruited to assess their impressions of the recommendations. A mixed-methods study design was employed, with a survey, followed by focus group interviews. Participating residents and fellows were recruited through a purposeful sampling approach. Descriptive statistics were applied to analyze the survey data, and a thematic data analysis on interview transcripts was employed. The majority of trainee respondents (n=16) thought that all of the subcommittee recommendations should be included in the final BRC II recommendations and paper. According to the interviews, overall, the feedback from the trainees was positive, with particular excitement around work-life integration, education support and faculty development, and funding pitfalls. Some themes about concerns included a lack of clarity about the recommendations, concern about some recommendations being in conflict with one another, and a disconnect between the initial BRC II survey and the subsequent recommendations. The residents gathered for this focus group were encouraged by the thought, effort, and intention that gathered the surgical leaders across the country to make the recommendations. While there were areas the trainees wanted clarity on, the overall opinion was in agreement with the recommendations.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to appraise recommendations from an expert panel of surgical educators on optimizing surgical education and training in the setting of contemporary challenges.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC II), a group of surgical educators, was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training considering the current changes in the landscape of surgical education. Surgical trainees were recruited to assess their impressions of the recommendations.
METHODS METHODS
A mixed-methods study design was employed, with a survey, followed by focus group interviews. Participating residents and fellows were recruited through a purposeful sampling approach. Descriptive statistics were applied to analyze the survey data, and a thematic data analysis on interview transcripts was employed.
RESULTS RESULTS
The majority of trainee respondents (n=16) thought that all of the subcommittee recommendations should be included in the final BRC II recommendations and paper. According to the interviews, overall, the feedback from the trainees was positive, with particular excitement around work-life integration, education support and faculty development, and funding pitfalls. Some themes about concerns included a lack of clarity about the recommendations, concern about some recommendations being in conflict with one another, and a disconnect between the initial BRC II survey and the subsequent recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The residents gathered for this focus group were encouraged by the thought, effort, and intention that gathered the surgical leaders across the country to make the recommendations. While there were areas the trainees wanted clarity on, the overall opinion was in agreement with the recommendations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39109446
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006483
pii: 00000658-990000000-01016
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Wali R Johnson (WR)

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Bigyan B Mainali (BB)

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Xiaodong Chen (X)

The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.

Wilson Alobuia (W)

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Erik M Anderson (EM)

University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Rebecca Martin (R)

University of California-Davis Health, Sacramento, California.

Katharine E Caldwell (KE)

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Kwesi Dawson-Amoah (K)

WellSpan Health, York Pennsylvania.

Kathleen Doyle (K)

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.

Danielle Ellis (D)

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Brian Fazzone (B)

University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Michael Ghio (M)

Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Caroline M Godfrey (CM)

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Camilla Gomes (C)

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Lea Hoefer (L)

University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

LaDonna Kearse (L)

Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.

Hannah Niehaus-White (H)

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Hannah Phelps (H)

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Andrea N Riner (AN)

University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Cimarron Sharon (C)

Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Thomas H Shin (TH)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Kirbi Yelorda (K)

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Julia R Coleman (JR)

The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.

Classifications MeSH