[Modified Masquelet technique : Technique of the induced membrane in the course of time].
Modifizierte Masquelet-Plastik : Technik der induzierten Membran im Wandel der Zeit.
Bone defect
Diamond concept
Fractures, ununited
Induced membrane
Pseudarthrosis
Journal
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)
ISSN: 2731-703X
Titre abrégé: Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9918384886306676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Aug 2024
07 Aug 2024
Historique:
accepted:
19
07
2024
medline:
7
8
2024
pubmed:
7
8
2024
entrez:
7
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The reconstruction of long bone defects as a result of primary traumatic, secondary infection or tumor-related loss of substance continues to represent a surgical challenge. Callus distraction via segment transport, vascularized bone transfer and the induced membrane technique (IMT) are established methods of reconstruction. In recent decades IMT has experienced increasing popularity due to its practicability, reproducibility and reliability. At the same time, the original technique has undergone numerous modifications. The results are correspondingly heterogeneous. This overview is intended to explain the basic principles of IMT and to provide an overview of the various modifications and their complications. Die Rekonstruktion langstreckiger Knochendefekte infolge von primär traumatischen oder sekundär infektions- oder tumorbedingten Substanzverlusten stellt nach wie vor eine chirurgische Herausforderung dar. Die Kallusdistraktion über Segmenttransport, der vaskularisierte Knochentransfer und die induzierte Membrantechnik (IMT) stellen etablierte Verfahren der Rekonstruktion dar. In den letzten Jahrzehnten erfreut sich die IMT aufgrund ihrer Praktikabilität, Reproduzierbarkeit und Zuverlässigkeit zunehmender Popularität. Gleichsam erfuhr die Originaltechnik eine Vielzahl von Modifikationen. Die Ergebnisse stellen sich als entsprechend heterogen dar. Diese Übersicht soll die wesentlichen Grundprinzipien der IMT darlegen und einen Überblick über die verschiedenen Modifikationen und ihre Komplikationen geben.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(ger)
Die Rekonstruktion langstreckiger Knochendefekte infolge von primär traumatischen oder sekundär infektions- oder tumorbedingten Substanzverlusten stellt nach wie vor eine chirurgische Herausforderung dar. Die Kallusdistraktion über Segmenttransport, der vaskularisierte Knochentransfer und die induzierte Membrantechnik (IMT) stellen etablierte Verfahren der Rekonstruktion dar. In den letzten Jahrzehnten erfreut sich die IMT aufgrund ihrer Praktikabilität, Reproduzierbarkeit und Zuverlässigkeit zunehmender Popularität. Gleichsam erfuhr die Originaltechnik eine Vielzahl von Modifikationen. Die Ergebnisse stellen sich als entsprechend heterogen dar. Diese Übersicht soll die wesentlichen Grundprinzipien der IMT darlegen und einen Überblick über die verschiedenen Modifikationen und ihre Komplikationen geben.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39110137
doi: 10.1007/s00113-024-01474-6
pii: 10.1007/s00113-024-01474-6
doi:
Types de publication
English Abstract
Journal Article
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Masquelet AC, Begue T (2010) The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin North Am 41:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2009.07.011
doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.07.011
pubmed: 19931050
Karger C, Kishi T, Schneider L, Fitoussi F, Masquelet AC (2012) Treatment of posttraumatic bone defects by the induced membrane technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:97–102
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.11.001
pubmed: 22244249
Taylor BC, Hancock J, Zitzke R, Castaneda J (2015) Treatment of bone loss with the induced membrane technique: techniques and outcomes ( http://links.lww.com/BOT/A376 )
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000338
Giannoudis PV, Harwood PJ, Tosounidis T, Kanakaris NK (2016) Restoration of long bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique: protocol and outcomes. Injury 47:S53–S61
doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30840-3
pubmed: 28040088
Miska M, Schmidmaier G (2020) Diamond-Konzept zur Behandlung von Pseudarthrosen und Knochendefekten. Unfallchirurg 123(9):679–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-020-00843-1 (Diamond concept for treatment of nonunions and bone defects)
doi: 10.1007/s00113-020-00843-1
pubmed: 32761357
Fischer C, Mendel T, Hückstädt M, Hofmann GO, Klauke F (2023) Reconstruction of a metadiaphyseal bone defect after open comminuted fracture of the proximal femur using a modified Masquelet technique. Unfallchirurgie 126:812–816
doi: 10.1007/s00113-022-01278-6
pubmed: 36599965
Moghaddam A, Zietzschmann S, Bruckner T, Schmidmaier G (2015) Treatment of atrophic tibia non-unions according to ‘diamond concept’: results of one- and two-step treatment. Injury 46:S39–S50
doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30017-6
pubmed: 26542865
Gindraux F et al (2017) Similarities between induced membrane and amniotic membrane: novelty for bone repair. Placenta 59:116–123
doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.06.340
pubmed: 28673520
Giannoudis PV E. T. M. D. Fracture healing: the diamond concept https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(08)70003-2
Calori GM, Giannoudis PV (2011) Enhancement of fracture healing with the diamond concept: the role of the biological chamber. Injury 42:1191–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.04.016
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.04.016
pubmed: 21596376
Tzioupis C, Giannoudis PV (2007) Prevalence of long-bone non-unions. Injury 38:S3
doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(07)80003-9
pubmed: 17920415
Liodakis E, Giannoudis VP, Sehmisch S, Jha A, Giannoudis PV (2022) Bone defect treatment: does the type and properties of the spacer affect the induction of Masquelet membrane? Evidence today. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48:4403–4424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02005-x
doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02005-x
pubmed: 35726029
pmcid: 9712326
Durand M et al (2022) Influence of the immune microenvironment provided by implanted biomaterials on the biological properties of Masquelet-induced membranes in rats: Metakaolin as an alternative spacer. Biomedicines 10:
Morelli I et al (2016) Masquelet technique: myth or reality? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 47:S68–S76
doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30842-7
pubmed: 28040090
Kobbe P, Tarkin IS, Frink M, Pape HC (2008) Gewinnung großvolumiger spongiosamengen zur autologen knochentransplantation aus dem femoralen markraum. Eine besondere applikation der ‚Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator-‘ (RIA-)technik. Unfallchirurg 111:469–472
doi: 10.1007/s00113-007-1359-7
pubmed: 18273594
Pfeifer R, Kobbe P, Knobe M, Pape HC (2011) Das Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA)-System. Oper Orthop Traumatol 23:446–452
doi: 10.1007/s00064-011-0117-8
pubmed: 22089703
Mi M, Papakostidis C, Wu X, Giannoudis PV (2020) Mixed results with the Masquelet technique: a fact or a myth? Injury 51:132–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.032
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.032
pubmed: 31883866
Giannoudis PV, Faour O, Goff T, Kanakaris N, Dimitriou R (2011) Masquelet technique for the treatment of bone defects: Tips-tricks and future directions. Injury 42:591–598
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.036
pubmed: 21543068
Stafford PR, Norris BL (2010) Reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft and bi Masquelet technique for segmental bone defect nonunions: a review of 25 cases. Injury 41(Suppl 2):S72–S77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(10)70014-0
doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(10)70014-0
pubmed: 21144933
Masquelet AC (2017) Induced membrane technique: pearls and pitfalls. J Orthop Trauma 31:S36–S38
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000979
pubmed: 28938390
Gindraux F et al (2020) Induced membrane maintains its osteogenic properties even when the second stage of Masquelet’s technique is performed later. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 46:301–312
doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01184-4
pubmed: 31321472
Mathieu L et al (2021) Induced membrane technique: a critical literature analysis and proposal for a failure classification scheme. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 47:1373–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01540-9
doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01540-9
pubmed: 33226484
Hsu CA, Chen SH, Chan SY, Yu YH (2020) The induced membrane technique for the management of segmental tibial defect or nonunion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 22(2020):5893642. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5893642
doi: 10.1155/2020/5893642
Fung B, Hoit G, Schemitsch E, Godbout C, Nauth A (2020) The induced membrane technique for the management of long bone defects. Bone Joint J 102-B(12):1723–1734. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-1125.R1
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-1125.R1
pubmed: 33249891
Hofmann J, Klingele S, Haberkorn U, Schmidmaier G, Grossner T (2021) Impact of high-dose anti-infective agents on the osteogenic response of mesenchymal stem cells. Antibiotics 10:
Andrzejowski P, Giannoudis PV (2019) The ‘diamond concept’ for long bone non-union management. J Orthop Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-019-0528-0
doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0528-0
pubmed: 30976944
pmcid: 6459453
Andrzejowski P, Masquelet A, Giannoudis PV (2020) Induced membrane technique (Masquelet) for bone defects in the distal tibia, foot, and ankle: systematic review, case presentations, tips, and techniques. Foot Ankle Clin 25:537–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2020.08.013
doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2020.08.013
pubmed: 33543716
Mathieu L et al (2020) Repeated induced-membrane technique failure without infection: a series of three consecutive procedures performed for a single femur defect. Case Rep Orthop 2020:1–7
doi: 10.1155/2020/8892226
Han F et al (2015) Reamer irrigator aspirator bone graft harvesting: complications and outcomes in an asian population. Injury 46:2042–2051
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.027
pubmed: 26253387
Oliva F et al (2021) Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00612-9
doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00612-9
pubmed: 34851462
pmcid: 8636545
Laubach M et al (2023) Complications associated using the reamer–irrigator–aspirator (RIA) system: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:3823–3843
doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04621-z
pubmed: 36114869
Le Baron M, Vivona JP, Maman P, Volpi R, Flecher X (2019) Can the reamer/irrigator/aspirator system replace anterior iliac crest grafting when treating long bone nonunion? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:529–533
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.12.011
pubmed: 30885818
Metsemakers WJ et al (2019) Reamer–irrigator–aspirator bone graft harvesting for treatment of segmental bone loss: analysis of defect volume as independent risk factor for failure. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 45:21–29
doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0821-7
pubmed: 28744612