Adjustment for imbalances in baseline characteristics in the MAGNITUDE phase 3 study confirms the clinical benefit of niraparib in combination with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

BRCA Inverse probability of treatment weighting Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer Propensity-matched analysis Prostate cancer Radiographic progression-free survival

Journal

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 02 02 2024
revised: 02 05 2024
accepted: 15 06 2024
medline: 8 8 2024
pubmed: 8 8 2024
entrez: 7 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

MAGNITUDE (NCT03748641) demonstrated favourable outcomes with niraparib plus abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (+AAP) versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Imbalances in prognostic variables were reported between arms, which impacts estimation of both the clinical benefit and cost‑effectiveness of niraparib+AAP for healthcare systems. A pre-specified multivariable analysis (MVA) demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with niraparib+AAP. Here, we used an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) model to adjust for covariate imbalances and assess time-to-event outcomes. IPTW analysis of time-to-event outcomes was conducted using data from patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC (N = 225) in MAGNITUDE. Patients received niraparib+AAP or placebo+AAP. OS, radiographic progression-free survival, time to symptomatic progression, time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy and time to prostate-specific antigen progression were assessed. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for each endpoint, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were obtained from a weighted Cox model. Improvements in survival outcomes were estimated for niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP: unadjusted median OS was 30.4 months versus 28.6 months, respectively (HR: 0.79; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 1.12; p = 0.183). Following IPTW, median OS increased to 34.1 months with niraparib+AAP versus a decrease to 27.4 with placebo (HR: 0.65; 95 % CI: 0.46, 0.93; p = 0.017). Similar improvements were observed for other time-to-event endpoints. IPTW adjustment provided a more precise estimate of the clinical benefit of niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC. Results were consistent with the pre-specified MVA, and further demonstrated the value of adjusting for baseline imbalances, particularly in smaller studies. NCT03748641 (MAGNITUDE).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
MAGNITUDE (NCT03748641) demonstrated favourable outcomes with niraparib plus abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (+AAP) versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Imbalances in prognostic variables were reported between arms, which impacts estimation of both the clinical benefit and cost‑effectiveness of niraparib+AAP for healthcare systems. A pre-specified multivariable analysis (MVA) demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with niraparib+AAP. Here, we used an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) model to adjust for covariate imbalances and assess time-to-event outcomes.
METHODS METHODS
IPTW analysis of time-to-event outcomes was conducted using data from patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC (N = 225) in MAGNITUDE. Patients received niraparib+AAP or placebo+AAP. OS, radiographic progression-free survival, time to symptomatic progression, time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy and time to prostate-specific antigen progression were assessed. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for each endpoint, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were obtained from a weighted Cox model.
RESULTS RESULTS
Improvements in survival outcomes were estimated for niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP: unadjusted median OS was 30.4 months versus 28.6 months, respectively (HR: 0.79; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 1.12; p = 0.183). Following IPTW, median OS increased to 34.1 months with niraparib+AAP versus a decrease to 27.4 with placebo (HR: 0.65; 95 % CI: 0.46, 0.93; p = 0.017). Similar improvements were observed for other time-to-event endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
IPTW adjustment provided a more precise estimate of the clinical benefit of niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC. Results were consistent with the pre-specified MVA, and further demonstrated the value of adjusting for baseline imbalances, particularly in smaller studies.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
NCT03748641 (MAGNITUDE).

Identifiants

pubmed: 39111209
pii: S0959-8049(24)00839-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114183
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03748641']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

114183

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: GR: Received consulting or advisory role fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Merck and Pfizer; research funding from Bayer; and travel, accommodations, or expense reimbursements from Janssen. GA: Received honoraria from Astellas and Janssen; consulting or advisory fees from Abbott Laboratories, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, ESSA, Ferring, Janssen, Medivation, Millennium, Novartis, Pfizer, Ventana Medical Systems and Veridex; speakers’ bureau fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Ferring, Ipsen, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda and Ventana Medical Systems; research funding from Arno Therapeutics, Innocrin Pharma and Janssen; has patents or other intellectual property or received royalties for abiraterone acetate; received travel, accommodations, or expense reimbursements from Abbott Laboratories, Astellas, Bayer, ESSA, Ferring, Janssen, Medivation, Pfizer and Ventana Medical Systems; and is affiliated with the Institute of Cancer Research. MB: Received honoraria from Advanced Accelerator Applications, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer/Vital, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, EUSA Pharma, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi/Aventis; consulting or advisory role for Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; institution received research funding from Ipsen and Janssen; received travel, accommodation and expenses from Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen; employment at Janssen. DO: Received honoraria from Astellas, Bayer and Janssen; consulting or advisory role fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen and Merck; research funding from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Genentech/Roche, Janssen, Medivation, Merck, Pfizer and Tokai Pharmaceuticals; and travel, accommodations, or expense reimbursements from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Ipsen, Janssen and Roche. KP: Employee of Janssen and shareholder of Johnson and Johnson. MT, LA, CC, SVS, MH: Employees of Janssen. SP: Received consultancy fees from Janssen for participation in advisory boards and general methodological advice. KC: Received honoraria from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, Merck, and Roche; consulting or advisory fees from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, ESSA, Janssen, Merck, POINT Biopharma, Roche, and Sanofi; research funding from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, ESSA, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; and gave expert testimony for AstraZeneca and Novartis.

Auteurs

Guilhem Roubaud (G)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: g.roubaud@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.

Gerhardt Attard (G)

University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.

Martin Boegemann (M)

Department of Urology, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany; Westgerman Cancer Center, Münster, Germany.

David Olmos (D)

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

Marco Trevisan (M)

Janssen EMEA, Geneva, Switzerland.

Laurent Antoni (L)

Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Antwerp, Belgium.

Katie Pascoe (K)

Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands.

Camille Capone (C)

Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Antwerp, Belgium.

Suzy Van Sanden (S)

Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Antwerp, Belgium.

Mahmoud Hashim (M)

Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands.

Stephen Palmer (S)

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.

Kim Chi (K)

BC Cancer and Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Classifications MeSH