Assessment of DNA quality for whole genome library preparation.

DNA degradation DNA extraction Double stranded DNA Genome sequencing Single stranded DNA

Journal

Analytical biochemistry
ISSN: 1096-0309
Titre abrégé: Anal Biochem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370535

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 11 03 2024
revised: 26 07 2024
accepted: 03 08 2024
medline: 8 8 2024
pubmed: 8 8 2024
entrez: 7 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In recent years, more sophisticated DNA technologies for genotyping have enabled considerable progress in various fields such as clinical genetics, archaeogenetics and forensic genetics. DNA samples previously rejected as too challenging to analyze due to low amounts of degraded DNA can now provide useful information. To increase the chances of success with the new methodologies, it is crucial to know the fragment size of the template DNA molecules, and whether the DNA in a sample is mostly single or double stranded. With this knowledge, an appropriate library preparation method can be chosen, and the DNA shearing parameters of the protocol can be adjusted to the DNA fragment size in the sample. In this study, we first developed and evaluated a user-friendly fluorometry-based protocol for estimation of DNA strandedness. We also evaluated different capillary electrophoresis methods for estimation of DNA fragmentation levels. Next, we applied the developed methodologies to a broad variety of DNA samples processed with different DNA extraction protocols. Our findings show that both the applied DNA extraction method and the sample type affect the DNA strandedness and fragmentation. The established protocols and the gained knowledge will be applicable for future sequencing-based high-density SNP genotyping in various fields.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39111682
pii: S0003-2697(24)00180-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2024.115636
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

115636

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☐ The author is an Editorial Board Member/Editor-in-Chief/Associate Editor/Guest Editor for [Journal name] and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. ☐ The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:

Auteurs

Linda Jansson (L)

National Forensic Centre, Swedish Police Authority, Linköping, Sweden; Applied Microbiology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Siri Aili Fagerholm (SA)

National Forensic Centre, Swedish Police Authority, Linköping, Sweden.

Emelie Börkén (E)

Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, National Board of Forensic Medicine, Linköping, Sweden.

Arvid Hedén Gynnå (A)

National Forensic Centre, Swedish Police Authority, Linköping, Sweden.

Maja Sidstedt (M)

National Forensic Centre, Swedish Police Authority, Linköping, Sweden.

Christina Forsberg (C)

National Forensic Centre, Swedish Police Authority, Linköping, Sweden.

Ricky Ansell (R)

National Forensic Centre, Swedish Police Authority, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Johannes Hedman (J)

National Forensic Centre, Swedish Police Authority, Linköping, Sweden; Applied Microbiology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Andreas Tillmar (A)

Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, National Board of Forensic Medicine, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Electronic address: andreas.tillmar@rmv.se.

Classifications MeSH