Intuitive moral bias favors the religiously faithful.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 17 01 2024
accepted: 18 07 2024
medline: 8 8 2024
pubmed: 8 8 2024
entrez: 7 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Belief in powerful supernatural agents that enforce moral norms has been theoretically linked with cooperative altruism and prosociality. Correspondingly, prior research reveals an implicit association between atheism and extreme antisociality (e.g., serial murder). However, findings centered on associations between lack of faith and moral transgression do not directly address the hypothesized conceptual association between religious belief and prosociality. Accordingly, we conducted two pre-registered experiments depicting a "serial helper" to assess biases related to extraordinary helpfulness, mirroring designs depicting a serial killer used in prior cross-cultural work. In both a predominantly religious society (the U.S., Study 1) and a predominantly secular society (New Zealand, Study 2), we successfully replicated previous research linking atheism with transgression, and obtained evidence for a substantially stronger conceptual association between religiosity and virtue. The results suggest that stereotypes linking religiosity with prosociality are both real and global in scale.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39112535
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67960-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-67960-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

18291

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Atran, S. In Gods We Trust (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Johnson, D. God’s punishment and public goods. Hum. Nat. 16(4), 410–446 (2005).
doi: 10.1007/s12110-005-1017-0 pubmed: 26189839
Shariff, A. F., Norenzayan, A. & Henrich, J. The birth of high gods: How the cultural evolution of supernatural policing influenced the emergence of complex, cooperative human societies, paving the way for civilization. In Evolution, Culture, and the Human Mind (eds Schaller, M. et al.) 119–136 (Psychology Press, 2010).
McKay, R. T., Efferson, C., Whitehouse, H. & Fehr, E. Wrath of God: Religious primes and punishment. Proc. R. Soc. B 278(1713), 1858–1863 (2011).
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2125 pubmed: 21106588
Fitouchi, L. & Singh, M. Supernatural punishment beliefs as cognitively compelling tools of social control. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 44, 252–257 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.022 pubmed: 34752999
Durkheim, E. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (Allen & Unwin, 1912).
Rappaport, R. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511814686
Atran, S. Talking to the Enemy: Faith, Brotherhood, and the (un)Making of Terrorists (HarperCollins, 2010).
Graham, J. & Haidt, J. Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 14(1), 140–150 (2010).
doi: 10.1177/1088868309353415 pubmed: 20089848
Hall, D. L., Cohen, A. B., Meyer, K. K., Varley, A. H. & Brewer, G. A. Costly signaling increases trust, even across religious affiliations. Psychol. Sci. 26(9), 1368–1376 (2015).
doi: 10.1177/0956797615576473 pubmed: 26187247
Tan, J. H. & Vogel, C. Religion and trust: An experimental study. J. Econ. Psychol. 29(6), 832–848 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2008.03.002
Norenzayan, A. et al. The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behav. Brain Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14001356 (2016).
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X14001356 pubmed: 26948747
Richerson, P. et al. Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behav. Brain Sci. 39, E30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400106X (2016).
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1400106X pubmed: 25347943
Gervais, W. M. Everything is permitted? People intuitively judge immorality as representative of atheists. PloS ONE 9(4), e92302 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092302 pubmed: 24717972 pmcid: 3981659
Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A. F. & Norenzayan, A. Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101(6), 1189 (2011).
doi: 10.1037/a0025882 pubmed: 22059841
Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., McKee, S. & Gervais, W. M. Atheist horns and religious halos: Mental representations of atheists and theists. J. Exp. Psychol.: General 147(2), 292 (2018).
doi: 10.1037/xge0000376
Brown, M. Preliminary evidence for an aversion to atheists in long-term mating domains in the Southern United States. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 39(3), 711–733 (2022).
doi: 10.1177/02654075211045051
Pew Research Center. (2019). Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2019/07/23/what-americans-know-about-religion/
Gervais, W. M. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1(8), 0151 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0151
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning—The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychol. Rev. 90, 293–315 (1983).
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293
van Zwet, E. W. & Goodman, S. N. How large should the next study be? Predictive power and sample size requirements for replication studies. Stat. Med. 41(16), 3090–3101 (2022).
doi: 10.1002/sim.9406 pubmed: 35396714 pmcid: 9325423
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G. & Ickovics, J. R. Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 19, 586–592 (2000).
doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586 pubmed: 11129362
Moon, J. W., Krems, J. A. & Cohen, A. B. Religious people are trusted because they are viewed as slow life-history strategists. Psychol. Sci. 29(6), 947–960 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/0956797617753606 pubmed: 29590005
Lang, M. et al. Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies. Proc. R. Soc. B 286(1898), 20190202 (2019).
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0202 pubmed: 30836871 pmcid: 6458319
Bendixen, T. et al. Gods are watching and so what? Moralistic supernatural punishment across 15 cultures. Evol. Hum. Sci. 5, 1–30 (2023).
Sedikides, C. & Gebauer, J. E. Do religious people self-enhance?. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 40, 29–33 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.002 pubmed: 32892032

Auteurs

Alex Dayer (A)

Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, 5200 Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95340, USA. adayer@ucmerced.edu.

Chanuwas Aswamenakul (C)

Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, 5200 Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95340, USA.

Matthew A Turner (MA)

Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, 5200 Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95340, USA.

Scott Nicolay (S)

Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, 5200 Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95340, USA.
Interdisciplinary Humanities Graduate Group, University of California, 5200 Lake Road, CA, Merced, USA.

Emily Wang (E)

Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, 5200 Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95340, USA.

Katherine Shurik (K)

Interdisciplinary Humanities Graduate Group, University of California, 5200 Lake Road, CA, Merced, USA.

Colin Holbrook (C)

Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, 5200 Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95340, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH