An analytic method to investigate hemodynamics of the cardiovascular system: Biventricular system.

Previously, we found analytic solutions for single ventricular system based on the lumped parameter model (LPM). In this study, we generalized the method to biventricular system and derived its analytic solutions. LPM is just a set of differential equations, but it is difficult to solve due to time-varying ventricular elastance and high order. Mathematically, there exist no elementary solutions for time-varying equations. It turns out that instead of differential equations, according to volume conservation, a set of algebraic equations can be carried out. The solutions of the set of equations are just physiological states at end of systolic and diastolic phases such as end systolic/diastolic pressure/volume of left ventricle. As a preliminary application, the method is utilized to deduce the hemodynamic effects of VA ECMO. Left ventricular (LV) distension, a serious complication of VA ECMO, is usually attributed to factors such as increased afterload, inadequate LV unloading, reduced myocardial contractility or aortic valve regurgitation (AR), bronchial and Thebesian return in the absence of aortic valve (AoV) opening. Among these, reduced contractility and AR are strongly associated with LV distension. However, in the absence of reduced contractility or AR, it is less clear whether increased afterload or inadequate LV unloading alone can cause LV distension. This leads to the critical question: under what conditions does LV distension occur in the absence of reduced contractility or AR? The analytic formulas derived in this study give conditions for LV distension. Furthermore, the results show that the analytic hemodynamics are coincident with simulated results.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Polin Hsu is the founder and CEO of magAssist, Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.