Evaluation of Current and Future Medical Staff Knowledge on the Course of Trauma Patient Management.

Management of injuries, especially in life-threatening situations, is critical to morbidity and mortality for trauma patients. The qualifications of medical staff and students in medicine, emergency medical services, and nursing help to ensure consistent, high-quality care for patients. The study aimed to assess the knowledge of our staff and learners in the management of trauma patients. The study was carried out using a proprietary research tool consisting of 47 questions, including six independent variables. The knowledge assessment tool has been divided into five categories according to the degree of difficulty. The questions have been created based on the current guidelines of the ERC 2021, ITLS, PTLS, and TCCC. The study included 295 subjects (medical students, nursing students, students of emergency medical services, physicians, paramedics, and nurses). The vast majority of respondents (79.7%) have never participated in a certified trauma course. Respondents could obtain a total of 117 points for answering all questions. The highest score was 111 points, and the lowest was 26 points. The average score was 63 points. Paramedics received the highest average score of 78 points. The question with the smallest number of correct answers concerned the priority procedure in the case of an electric shock victim. Better training in trauma patient management is needed for both current medical staff and students. A certified trauma course is a good source of knowledge and skills, but it would need to be repeated periodically. This would ensure an increase in the competence of medical staff involved in the care of trauma patients.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, Dąbrowska et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Bioethics Committee for Scientific Research at the Medical University of Gdansk issued approval NKBBN/693/2022. The independent Bioethics Committee for Scientific Research at the Medical University of Gdansk (NKBBN/693/2022) gave a positive opinion on the project and the research tool. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.