An Example of a Clinical Research Ethics Committee in Türkiye: Types of Studies Analysed, Their Phases and Investigators.

Clinical trials research ethics committees researchers

Journal

Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE
ISSN: 1556-2654
Titre abrégé: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101273949

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 9 8 2024
pubmed: 9 8 2024
entrez: 9 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Clinical studies are reviewed by clinical research ethics committees (CRECs) in order to ensure that they are conducted within the framework of good clinical practice and that the rights of volunteers are respected. Research type, department, status, scope, principal investigator's characteristics and CREC decisions were all evaluated. A total of 1044 research applications were found to have been submitted. In addition, 14.6% of the applications were clinical trials and 48.8% were retrospective studies. Of all the researchers, 50.4% of them were found to have indicated an incorrect type of research. The very low number of interventional clinical trials suggests that researchers tended to be hesitant about conducting such trials or did not have the means to do so. The fact that the applications were often submitted by indicating a wrong type of research method also signifies the investigators' lack of knowledge in this regard.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39119672
doi: 10.1177/15562646241273162
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15562646241273162

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Gungor Buket (G)

Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH