Functional patient-reported outcome measures after hip or knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and content analysis using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).


Journal

Arthritis care & research
ISSN: 2151-4658
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101518086

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Aug 2024
Historique:
revised: 25 07 2024
received: 13 06 2024
accepted: 07 08 2024
medline: 9 8 2024
pubmed: 9 8 2024
entrez: 9 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This systematic review aimed to identify the existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in hip or knee arthroplasty for adults with osteoarthritis and assess their content validity using the modified International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set for osteoarthritis (OA). Four databases were systematically searched to identify disease or joint-specific PROMs evaluating function after hip or knee arthroplasty. Two reviewers independently evaluated the content of PROMs based on established ICF linking rules. From 449 studies included in this review, 50 PROMs were identified. The mobility chapter of activities and participation was the most common component, followed by sensory function and pain chapter of body function and structure. The most frequent ICF activity and participation categories were d451:going up and down stairs, d4701:using private motorized transportation, d4104:standing, and d4154:maintaining a standing position. However, 11 ICF categories of the modified OA coreset were not captured in any PROMs. This ICF-based content analysis of PROMs revealed that included activity and participation categories vary widely, with little overlap between PROMs. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score had the most coverage for activity and participation (36.7%). Even though our search identified 50 specific PROMs, there remain gaps in content related to activity and participation coverage. By providing a content analysis of the PROMs used after hip or knee arthroplasty, this study may help clinicians select PROMs based on covered categories and relevant clinical objectives.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39119739
doi: 10.1002/acr.25413
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Motahareh Karimijashni (M)

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Forough Abtahi (F)

Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.

Shokoofih Abbasalipour (S)

Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Parisa Ranjbar (P)

University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.

Armaghan Dabbagh (A)

University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Marie Westby (M)

Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Tim Ramsay (T)

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Paul E Beaulé (PE)

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.

Stéphane Poitras (S)

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Classifications MeSH