The effect of laser therapy for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.


Journal

Lasers in medical science
ISSN: 1435-604X
Titre abrégé: Lasers Med Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8611515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 25 10 2023
accepted: 31 07 2024
medline: 9 8 2024
pubmed: 9 8 2024
entrez: 9 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of the study was to measure the degree of dentine surface roughness caused by five distinct lasers used to treat dentine hypersensitivity, as well as to evaluate the subsequent bacterial colonization on these irradiated surfaces. Sixty human maxillary premolar teeth without caries or restoration which were extracted for periodontal reasons were used in this study. Five different types of lasers were applied to the root dentin surface. Tested samples were divided into six groups of 10 samples each; control, diode (810 nm), diode (980 nm), Nd: YAG, Er: YAG, and Er, Cr: YSGG laser groups. The arithmetic mean of the surface roughness values (Ra) and the average roughness over a measurement area (Sa) were measured pre- and post-application using any of the laser types. Swab samples were then collected from the dentin surface. Following a 24-hour incubation period at 37 °C, the colony forming units were counted using a stereoscope. The results demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the surface roughness values pre- and post-application (Ra and Sa, respectively) in the Er, Cr: YSGG laser group (p = 0.037,p = 0.007). No significant difference was observed in the other groups (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of bacterial colonies observed between the test and control groups. Diode and Nd: YAG lasers showed either a decrease or no change in surface roughness; however, the hard tissue lasers (Er: YAG, Er, Cr: YSGG) showed an increase. The Er: YAG and Nd: YAG laser groups exhibited decreased bacterial adhesion compared to the other groups.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39120679
doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04166-0
pii: 10.1007/s10103-024-04166-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

212

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity (2003) Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc 69(4):221–226
Liu XX, Tenenbaum HC, Wilder RS et al (2020) Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity: an evidence-based overview for dental practitioners. BMC Oral Health 20:220. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01199-z
doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01199-z pubmed: 32762733 pmcid: 7409672
Brännström M (1966) Sensitivity of dentine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 21(4):517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(66)90411-7
doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(66)90411-7 pubmed: 5218158
Hsu PJ, Chen JH, Chuang FH et al (2006) The combined occluding effects of fluoride-containing dentin desensitizer and Nd-YAG laser irradiation on human dentinal tubules: an in vitro study. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 22(1):24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70216-5
doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70216-5 pubmed: 16570565
Corona SA, Nascimento TN, Catirse AB et al (2003) Clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy and fluoride varnish for treating cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 30(12):1183–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01185.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01185.x pubmed: 14641661
Kumar NG, Mehta DS (2005) Short-term assessment of the nd:YAG laser with and without sodium fluoride varnish in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity–a clinical and scanning electron microscopy study. J Periodontol 76(7):1140–1147. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1140
doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1140 pubmed: 16018757
Hong JY, Lim HC, Herr Y (2016) Effects of a mouthwash containing potassium nitrate, sodium fluoride, and cetylpyridinium chloride on dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 46(1):46–56. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.1.46
doi: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.1.46 pubmed: 26937293 pmcid: 4771837
Orchardson R, Gillam DG (2000) The efficacy of potassium salts as agents for treating dentin hypersensitivity. J Orofac Pain 14(1):9–19
pubmed: 11203743
Lee SY, Jung HI, Jung BY et al (2015) Desensitizing efficacy of nano-carbonate apatite dentifrice and er, Cr:YSGG laser: a randomized clinical trial. Photomed Laser Surg 33:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3787
doi: 10.1089/pho.2014.3787 pubmed: 25594768
Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Severino M et al (2013) Lasers for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 92:492–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513487212
doi: 10.1177/0022034513487212 pubmed: 23609160
Rosa RR, Calazans FK, Nogueira RD et al (2016) Effects of different desensitizing treatments on root dentin permeability. Braz Oral Res 10;30(1):e111. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0111
Gholami GA, Fekrazad R, Esmaiel-Nejad A et al (2011) An evaluation of the occluding effects of Er;cr:YSGG, nd:YAG, CO
doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2628 pubmed: 21288081
Al-Saud LM, Al-Nahedh HN (2012) Occluding effect of nd:YAG laser and different dentin desensitizing agents on human dentinal tubules in vitro: a scanning electron microscopy investigation. Oper Dent 37(4):340–355. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-188-L
doi: 10.2341/10-188-L pubmed: 22313266
Orchardson R, Gillam DG (2006) Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 137(7):990–998. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0321
doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0321 pubmed: 16803826
Yilmaz HG, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E et al (2011) Clinical evaluation of Er,Cr:YSGG and GaAlAs laser therapy for treating dentine hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent 39(3):249–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.003 pubmed: 21238531
Contreras-Bulnes T-CB, Scougall-Vilchis R RJ et al (2019) Effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation on deciduous enamel roughness and bacterial adhesion: an in vitro study. Microsc Res Tech 82(11):1869–1877. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23354
doi: 10.1002/jemt.23354 pubmed: 31373738
Öncü E, Karabekiroğlu S, Ünlü N (2017) Effects of different desensitizers and lasers on dentine tubules: an in-vitro analysis. Microsc Res Tech 80(7):737–744. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22859
doi: 10.1002/jemt.22859 pubmed: 28251725
Yuzugullu B, Celik C, Ozcelik TB et al (2016) The effect of different polishing sequences on the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to feldspathic porcelain. J Adhes 92:939–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2015.1059763
doi: 10.1080/00218464.2015.1059763
Lee DH, Mai HN, Thant PP et al (2019) Effects of different surface finishing protocols for zirconia on surface roughness and bacterial biofilm formation. J Adv Prosthodont 11(1):41–47. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.41
doi: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.41 pubmed: 30847048 pmcid: 6400710
Cury MS, Silva CB, Nogueira RD et al (2018) Surface roughness and bacterial adhesion on root dentin treated with diode laser and conventional desensitizing agents. Lasers Med Sci 33(2):257–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2356-x
doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2356-x pubmed: 29032514
Nogueira RD, Silva CB, Lepri CP et al (2017) Evaluation of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion on tooth enamel ırradiated with high ıntensity lasers. Braz Dent J 28(1):24–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201701190
doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201701190 pubmed: 28301014
Tabatabaei MH, Chiniforush N, Hashemi G et al (2018) Efficacy comparison of nd:YAG laser, diode laser and dentine bonding agent in dentine hypersensitivity reduction: a clinical trial. Laser Ther 31(4):265–270. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.27_18-OR-24
doi: 10.5978/islsm.27_18-OR-24
Umberto R, Claudia R, Gaspare P et al (2012) Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by diode laser: a clinical study. Int J Dent 2012(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/858950
doi: 10.1155/2012/858950
Kurt S, Kırtıloğlu T, Yılmaz NA et al (2018) Evaluation of the effects of Er: YAG laser, Nd: YAG laser, and two different desensitizers on dentin permeability: in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci 2018;33(9):1883–1890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2546-1
Aranha AC, Eduardo Cde P (2012) Effects of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers on dentine hypersensitivity. Short-term clinical evaluation. Lasers Med Sci 27(4):813–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0988-9
doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0988-9 pubmed: 21912983
Hibst R, Keller U (1989) Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med 9(4):338–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900090405
doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900090405 pubmed: 2761329
Schwarz F, Arweiler N, Georg T, Reich E (2002) Desensitizing effects of an Er:YAG laser on hypersensitive dentine. J Clin Periodontol 29:211–215. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290305.x
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290305.x pubmed: 11940139
Badran Z, Boutigny H, Struillou X, Baroth S, Laboux O, Soueidan A (2011) Tooth desensitization with an Er:YAG laser: in vitro microscopical observation and a case report. Lasers Med Sci 26:139–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0835-4
doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0835-4 pubmed: 20809079
Cattoni F, Ferrante L, Mandile S et al (2023) Comparison of lasers and desensitizing agents in dentinal hypersensitivity therapy. Dent J 11(3):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11030063
doi: 10.3390/dj11030063
Fornaini C, Merigo E, Sozzi M et al (2016) Four different diode lasers comparison on soft tissues surgery: a preliminary ex vivo study. Laser Ther Jun 29(2):105–114. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.16-OR-08
doi: 10.5978/islsm.16-OR-08
Lopes AO, de Paula Eduardo C, Aranha ACC (2017) Evaluation of different treatment protocols for dentin hypersensitivity: an 18-month randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 32(5):1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2203-0
doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2203-0 pubmed: 28391435
Moura GF, Zeola LF, Silva MB et al (2019) Four-session protocol effectiveness in reducing cervical dentin hypersensitivity: a 24-week randomized clinical trial. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 37(2):117–123. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2018.4477
doi: 10.1089/photob.2018.4477 pubmed: 31050930
Yilmaz H, Yilmaz S, Cengiz E (2011) Long-term effect of diode laser irradiation compared to sodium fluoride varnish in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity in periodontal maintenance patients: a randomized controlled clinical study. J Photomed Laser Surg 29(11):721–725. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2010.2974
doi: 10.1089/pho.2010.2974 pubmed: 21668343
Sicilia A, Cuesta-Frechoso S, Suárez A et al (2009) Immediate efficacy of diode laser application in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity in periodontal maintenance patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 36(8):650–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01433.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01433.x pubmed: 19519874
Naghsh N, Kachuie M, Kachuie M et al (2020) Evaluation of the effects of 660-nm and 810-nm low-level diode lasers on the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. J Lasers Med Sci 11(2):126–131. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2020.22
doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.22 pubmed: 32273952 pmcid: 7118499
Raut CP, Sethi KS, Kohale B et al (2018) Evaluation of diode laser and stannous flouride in the treatment of root sensitivity after access flap surgery: Randomized controlled clinical trial. J Ind Soc Periodontol 22(2):158–163. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_2_18
doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_2_18
Tabibzadeh Z, Fekrazad R, Esmaeelnejad A et al (2018) Effect of combined application of high- and low-intensity lasers on dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 12(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.008
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.008 pubmed: 29732021 pmcid: 5928474
Pourshahidi S, Ebrahimi H, Mansourian A et al (2019) Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG and diode laser effects on dentin hypersensitivity: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 23(11):4051–4058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02841-z
doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02841-z pubmed: 30778688

Auteurs

Ozge Parlar Oz (O)

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

İrem Karagozoglu (İ)

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey. dtiremkaragozoglu@hotmail.com.

Ipek Kocer (I)

Faculty of medicine, Department of medical microbiology, Sanko University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Nermin Demırkol (N)

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Yasemin Zer (Y)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of medical microbiology, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH