Safety and feasibility of percutaneous abdominal lavage cytology screening (PACS) prior to surgical resection for pancreatic cancer.
Artificial ascites
Cytology
Exploratory laparotomy
Pancreatic cancer
Peritoneal lavage
Journal
Abdominal radiology (New York)
ISSN: 2366-0058
Titre abrégé: Abdom Radiol (NY)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Aug 2024
09 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
10
04
2024
accepted:
27
07
2024
revised:
26
07
2024
medline:
9
8
2024
pubmed:
9
8
2024
entrez:
9
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, diagnostic yield, and technical aspects of percutaneous abdominal lavage cytology screening (PACS) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. This single-center, retrospective study included patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent PACS before pancreatectomy between May 2022 and October 2023. The technical success rate, position of the drainage tube, volume of fluid administered, volume of fluid retrieved, fluid retrieval rate, and adverse events were evaluated. The cytological results of PACS were compared with those of surgical peritoneal lavage performed during pancreatectomy. Forty-four patients were enrolled in this study. The technical success rate for PACS was 100%. Drainage tube placement was outside the pouch of Douglas in all patients in the right-sided abdominal approach group (n = 10), whereas the placement was in the pouch of Douglas in all patients in the suprapubic approach group (n = 34). The mean volume of fluid administered, mean volume of fluid retrieved, and fluid retrieval rate were 185.0 ± 22.9 ml vs. 97.1 ± 32.0 ml (p < 0.001), 36.8 ± 25.6 ml vs. 50.5 ± 21.6 ml (p = 0.059), and 19.0 ± 12.4% vs. 54.9 ± 21.9% (p < 0.001) in the right abdominal approach and suprapubic approach groups, respectively. No adverse events were reported. The cytological results were benign in 42 patients; no discrepancy was observed in the results of surgical peritoneal lavage (n = 36). PACS is a feasible and safe procedure that can be performed before pancreatectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. the suprapubic approach may be ideal and PACS could be a screening method to detect carcinomatous peritonitis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39120716
doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04510-6
pii: 10.1007/s00261-024-04510-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : The National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
ID : 2022-A-16
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Egawa S, Toma H, Ohigashi H et al (2012) Japan Pancreatic Cancer Registry; 30th year anniversary: Japan Pancreas Society. Pancreas 41:985-992
doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318258055c
pubmed: 22750974
Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M et al (2017) Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15:1028-1061
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0131
pubmed: 28784865
Tsuchida H, Fujii T, Mizuma M et al (2019) Prognostic importance of peritoneal washing cytology in patients with otherwise resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatectomy: A nationwide, cancer registry-based study from the Japan Pancreas Society. Surgery 166:997-1003
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.06.023
pubmed: 31445763
Tanaka N, Takami H, Hayashi M et al (2023) Predictive impacts of peritoneal washing cytology for surgical resection-intended pancreatic cancer cases: Establishment of planned staging laparoscopy criteria. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 30:1273-1281
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1373
pubmed: 37799038
Clark CJ, Traverso LW (2010) Positive peritoneal lavage cytology is a predictor of worse survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. American Journal of Surgery 199:657-662
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.021
pubmed: 20466112
Hirabayashi K, Imoto A, Yamada M et al (2015) Positive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage Cytology is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Front Oncol 5:182
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00182
pubmed: 26301205
pmcid: 4528174
Cao F, Li J, Li A, Li F (2017) Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8:15004-15013
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14745
pubmed: 28122342
pmcid: 5362462
Leach SD, Rose JA, Lowy AM et al (1995) Significance of peritoneal cytology in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Surgery 118:472-478
doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80361-7
pubmed: 7652681
Ta R, O'Connor DB, Sulistijo A, Chung B, Conlon KC (2019) The Role of Staging Laparoscopy in Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Digestive Surgery 36:251-260
doi: 10.1159/000488372
pubmed: 29649825
Gullmo A (1989) Herniography. World Journal of Surgery 13:560-568
doi: 10.1007/BF01658871
pubmed: 2815800
Delmas L, Koch G, Cazzato RL et al (2021) Artificial ascites using the guidewire technique during microwave ablation in the liver dome: technique and analysis of fluid repartition. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:4452-4459
doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03077-w
pubmed: 33846828
Park SJ, Lee DH, Han JK (2021) Reducing Pain by Artificial Ascites Infusion During Radiofrequency Ablation for Subcapsular Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 44:565-573
doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02723-y
pubmed: 33388866
Wang CC, Kao JH (2015) Artificial ascites is feasible and effective for difficult-to-ablate hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int 9:514-519
doi: 10.1007/s12072-015-9639-8
pubmed: 26108302
Pak LM, Coit DG, Eaton AA et al (2017) Percutaneous Peritoneal Lavage for the Rapid Staging of Gastric and Pancreatic Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 24:1174-1179
doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5757-3
pubmed: 28058561
pmcid: 5504527
Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Millward SF, Sacks D, Society of Interventional R (2009) Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 20:S189-191
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.035
Khalilzadeh O, Baerlocher MO, Shyn PB et al (2017) Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 28:1432-1437 e1433
Kondo Y, Yoshida H, Shiina S, Tateishi R, Teratani T, Omata M (2006) Artificial ascites technique for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver cancer adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract. British Journal of Surgery 93:1277-1282
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5374
pubmed: 16783759
Liu LN, Xu HX, Lu MD, Xie XY (2010) Percutaneous ultrasound-guided thermal ablation for liver tumor with artificial pleural effusion or ascites. Chin J Cancer 29:830-835
doi: 10.5732/cjc.010.10095
pubmed: 20800026
Song I, Rhim H, Lim HK, Kim YS, Choi D (2009) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma abutting the diaphragm and gastrointestinal tracts with the use of artificial ascites: safety and technical efficacy in 143 patients. European Radiology 19:2630-2640
doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1463-x
pubmed: 19557416
Zhang M, Liang P, Cheng ZG, Yu XL, Han ZY, Yu J (2014) Efficacy and safety of artificial ascites in assisting percutaneous microwave ablation of hepatic tumours adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract. International Journal of Hyperthermia 30:134-141
doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.891765
pubmed: 24571176
Fischer RP, Beverlin BC, Engrav LH, Benjamin CI, Perry JF, Jr. (1978) Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: fourteen years and 2,586 patients later. American Journal of Surgery 136:701-704
doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(78)90339-2
pubmed: 717650
Henneman PL, Marx JA, Moore EE, Cantrill SV, Ammons LA (1990) Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: accuracy in predicting necessary laparotomy following blunt and penetrating trauma. Journal of Trauma 30:1345-1355
doi: 10.1097/00005373-199011000-00007
pubmed: 2231803
Okusaka T, Nakamura M, Yoshida M et al (2020) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer 2019 From the Japan Pancreas Society: A Synopsis. Pancreas 49:326-335
doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001513
pubmed: 32132516
Gugenheim J, Crovetto A, Petrucciani N (2022) Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Updates Surg 74:35-42
doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01186-1
pubmed: 34628591
van Dam JL, Janssen QP, Besselink MG et al (2022) Neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. European Journal of Cancer 160:140-149
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.10.023
pubmed: 34838371
Versteijne E, Vogel JA, Besselink MG et al (2018) Meta-analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. British Journal of Surgery 105:946-958
doi: 10.1002/bjs.10870
pubmed: 29708592