TRAbectedin in adVanced rEtroperitoneal well differentiated/dedifferentiated Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma (TRAVELL): results of a phase II study from the Italian Sarcoma Group.

chemotherapy leiomyosarcoma liposarcoma sarcoma trabectedin

Journal

ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 17 04 2024
revised: 28 06 2024
accepted: 28 06 2024
medline: 10 8 2024
pubmed: 10 8 2024
entrez: 9 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This is a multicentre, single-arm, phase II study aimed at further exploring the activity of trabectedin as second-/further-line treatment in retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (LPS). The primary endpoint was the growth modulation index (GMI) defined as the ratio between PFS under trabectedin (PFS) and during previous chemotherapy treatment: time to progression (TTP-1). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and PFS. As per protocol, patients were considered responders if the GMI was >1.33, non-responders if <0.75 and neither if 0.76-1.32. Overall 91 patients were assessable for the primary endpoint (32 patients with LMS and 59 patients with LPS): the median number of cycles received was 6.0 (Q1-Q3 3.0-12.0), and the main reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression in 72% of patients. The median PFS was 6.0 months, while the median TTP1 was 7.5 months (8.1 and 6.4 months for LMS and LPS, respectively). Thirty-three patients [52%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 36% to 58%, P = 0.674, odds of response 1.1] had a GMI >1.33 (LMS 46%, 95% CI 26% to 67%, odds of response 0.85; LPS 56%, 95% CI 40% to 72%, odds of response 1.3). Overall, in LPS we observed 15/47 patients with a GMI <0.5 and 15/47 patients with a GMI >2. Among LMS patients, 9/26 had a GMI <0.5 and 10/26 had a GMI >2. Overall, ORR (complete response + partial response) was 16% (24% for LMS and 12% for LPS). While the primary endpoint of the study was not met, we noticed a subgroup of patients with a markedly discrepant TTP with trabectedin in comparison to previous therapy (GMI <0.5 or >2, the latter including some patients with a long TTP with trabectedin). A mismatch between PFS and overall survival was observed, possibly due to the natural history of the two different histologies and the availability of further lines in LMS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This is a multicentre, single-arm, phase II study aimed at further exploring the activity of trabectedin as second-/further-line treatment in retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (LPS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
The primary endpoint was the growth modulation index (GMI) defined as the ratio between PFS under trabectedin (PFS) and during previous chemotherapy treatment: time to progression (TTP-1). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and PFS. As per protocol, patients were considered responders if the GMI was >1.33, non-responders if <0.75 and neither if 0.76-1.32.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall 91 patients were assessable for the primary endpoint (32 patients with LMS and 59 patients with LPS): the median number of cycles received was 6.0 (Q1-Q3 3.0-12.0), and the main reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression in 72% of patients. The median PFS was 6.0 months, while the median TTP1 was 7.5 months (8.1 and 6.4 months for LMS and LPS, respectively). Thirty-three patients [52%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 36% to 58%, P = 0.674, odds of response 1.1] had a GMI >1.33 (LMS 46%, 95% CI 26% to 67%, odds of response 0.85; LPS 56%, 95% CI 40% to 72%, odds of response 1.3). Overall, in LPS we observed 15/47 patients with a GMI <0.5 and 15/47 patients with a GMI >2. Among LMS patients, 9/26 had a GMI <0.5 and 10/26 had a GMI >2. Overall, ORR (complete response + partial response) was 16% (24% for LMS and 12% for LPS).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
While the primary endpoint of the study was not met, we noticed a subgroup of patients with a markedly discrepant TTP with trabectedin in comparison to previous therapy (GMI <0.5 or >2, the latter including some patients with a long TTP with trabectedin). A mismatch between PFS and overall survival was observed, possibly due to the natural history of the two different histologies and the availability of further lines in LMS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39121815
pii: S2059-7029(24)01436-4
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103667
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103667

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

C Fabbroni (C)

Fondazione IRCC Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Medical Oncology 2, Milan. Electronic address: chiara.fabbroni@istitutotumori.mi.it.

G Grignani (G)

Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Candiolo, Turin.

B Vincenzi (B)

Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome.

E Fumagalli (E)

Fondazione IRCC Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Medical Oncology 2, Milan.

T M De Pas (TM)

Division of Medical Oncology for Melanoma & Sarcoma, European Institute of Oncology, Milan; Medical Oncology Division, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo.

A Mazzocca (A)

Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome.

M A Pantaleo (MA)

Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna.

A Brunello (A)

Medical Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padua.

G G Baldi (GG)

Deparment of Oncology, Hospital of Prato, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Prato.

A Boglione (A)

Humanitas Gradenigo Torino, Turin; Fondazione IRCC Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Radiotherapy, Milan.

S Fatigoni (S)

Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni.

A Berruti (A)

Department of Medical & Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences & Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia.

M Giordano (M)

Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana, Como.

A Marrari (A)

Oncology Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan.

A P Dei Tos (AP)

Department of Medicine, University of Padua School of Medicine, Padua.

A S Alberton (AS)

Fondazione IRCC Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Medical Oncology 2, Milan.

S Aliberti (S)

Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Candiolo, Turin.

L Carlucci (L)

Laboratory of Methodology for Clinical Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

E Rulli (E)

Laboratory of Methodology for Clinical Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

P G Casali (PG)

Fondazione IRCC Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Medical Oncology 2, Milan.

R Sanfilippo (R)

Fondazione IRCC Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Medical Oncology 2, Milan.

Classifications MeSH