The INVISION Talar Component in Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Analysis of Early Outcomes.

INVISION ankle joint clinical outcome complication innovation joint reconstruction revision ankle arthroplasty

Journal

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 20 06 2024
revised: 15 07 2024
accepted: 22 07 2024
medline: 10 8 2024
pubmed: 10 8 2024
entrez: 10 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Launched in 2018 for revision total ankle arthroplasty (rTAA), the INVISION talar component addresses subsidence when poor talar bone stock is present. Due to the recency of the market-availability of the INVISION, studies evaluating its efficacy are lacking. This study presents the first analysis of early-term outcomes of patients undergoing rTAA with the INVISION talar component. This was a single-center, retrospective review of 28 patients undergoing rTAA with the INVISION talar component and INBONE II tibial component performed between 2018 and 2022. Data on preoperative characteristics, postoperative complications, secondary procedures, and survivorship were collected. The primary outcome measures were rates of major complications, re-operation, and implant failure. Secondary outcomes included post-operative changes in varus and valgus alignment of the tibia and talus. The most common secondary procedures performed with rTAA were medial malleolus fixation ( In a series of 28 patients undergoing rTAA with the INVISION talar component, we discovered comparatively low rates of reoperation, major complication, and implant failure (10.7%, 14.3%, and 10.7%). The INVISION system appears to have a reasonable safety profile, but further studies evaluating long-term outcomes are required to assess the efficacy of the INVISION system.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39125488
pii: diagnostics14151612
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14151612
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Bruno Valan (B)

Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Albert T Anastasio (AT)

Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Billy Kim (B)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY 10021, USA.

Alexandra Krez (A)

Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Kevin A Wu (KA)

Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Grayson M Talaski (GM)

Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

James Nunley (J)

Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

James K DeOrio (JK)

Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Mark E Easley (ME)

Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Samuel B Adams (SB)

Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Classifications MeSH