Comparison of mixotrophic and heterotrophic chrysomonads of similar size regarding bacterivory and growth rate.
Bacterivorous feeding
Chrysophytes
Food particle size
Growth rates
Individual variability
Mixotrophy
Journal
European journal of protistology
ISSN: 1618-0429
Titre abrégé: Eur J Protistol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8917383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jul 2024
17 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
13
02
2024
revised:
15
07
2024
accepted:
15
07
2024
medline:
11
8
2024
pubmed:
11
8
2024
entrez:
10
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Small chrysomonads are important bacterivores in aquatic ecosystems with a high molecular diversity compared to low morphological differences observed by light microscopy. The high diversity of these morphologically almost indistinguishable species leads to the question to which extent their functional role in ecosystems differs and how their ecological traits can be defined. The present study investigates the prey size and population growth rate of different chrysomonad species. Eleven phylogenetically well-defined strains representing seven strains of heterotrophic and four strains of mixotrophic chrysomonads were compared. All investigated strains belonged to the same functional group of bacterivorous flagellates, feeding on the same bacteria size range, while population growth rates of chrysomonads depended on nutritional strategy and species-specific differences. We observed a high individual variability of growth rates within a population. Our results point to the necessity to consider not only differences in ecological traits among species but also among specimens within a population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39126961
pii: S0932-4739(24)00059-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2024.126109
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
126109Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.