Ceramic Heads With 12/14 Titanium Sleeves Used on Manufacturer-Non-Compatible Retained Femoral Components Do Not Lead to Implant Failure in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

Ceramic heads with 12/14 titanium sleeves Mis and match implant failure rate manufacturer-compatible manufacturer-non-compatible

Journal

The Journal of arthroplasty
ISSN: 1532-8406
Titre abrégé: J Arthroplasty
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8703515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 19 04 2024
revised: 31 07 2024
accepted: 05 08 2024
medline: 11 8 2024
pubmed: 11 8 2024
entrez: 10 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Ceramic femoral heads with titanium sleeves are commonly used in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Companies advise against combination with a retained femoral component from another manufacturer. However, no data are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the implant failure and revision rates of ceramic heads with a 12/14 titanium sleeve used on manufacturer-compatible versus non-compatible retained femoral components. A retrospective single-center cohort analysis was performed using a prospectively maintained institutional arthroplasty registry. We identified 439 patients who received a titanium 12/14 ceramic head during rTHA between January 1 After a median follow-up of 6.6 years (IQR (Interquartile-range): 4.5 to 9.3), there was no significant difference (P = 0.770) in the re-revision rate between the manufacturer-compatible group (17.0%) and the non-compatible group (18.1%). Revision-free survival after rTHA was 81.2% in the manufacturer-compatible group and 78.9% in the manufacturer-non-compatible group after 15 years (P = 0.653). Most re-revisions occurred in the first year after rTHA, with 29 of 229 (12.7%) in the manufacturer-compatible group and 24 of 210 (11.4%) in the manufacturer-non-compatible group (P = 0.705). We observed only one implant failure in the manufacturer-non-compatible group, but this was not related to a mismatch problem. Although legal uncertainties remain, this study showed no increased risk of implant failure or revision rates when a ceramic femoral head with a 12/14 titanium sleeve was used on a non-compatible femoral stem from a manufacturer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Ceramic femoral heads with titanium sleeves are commonly used in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Companies advise against combination with a retained femoral component from another manufacturer. However, no data are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the implant failure and revision rates of ceramic heads with a 12/14 titanium sleeve used on manufacturer-compatible versus non-compatible retained femoral components.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective single-center cohort analysis was performed using a prospectively maintained institutional arthroplasty registry. We identified 439 patients who received a titanium 12/14 ceramic head during rTHA between January 1
RESULTS RESULTS
After a median follow-up of 6.6 years (IQR (Interquartile-range): 4.5 to 9.3), there was no significant difference (P = 0.770) in the re-revision rate between the manufacturer-compatible group (17.0%) and the non-compatible group (18.1%). Revision-free survival after rTHA was 81.2% in the manufacturer-compatible group and 78.9% in the manufacturer-non-compatible group after 15 years (P = 0.653). Most re-revisions occurred in the first year after rTHA, with 29 of 229 (12.7%) in the manufacturer-compatible group and 24 of 210 (11.4%) in the manufacturer-non-compatible group (P = 0.705). We observed only one implant failure in the manufacturer-non-compatible group, but this was not related to a mismatch problem.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Although legal uncertainties remain, this study showed no increased risk of implant failure or revision rates when a ceramic femoral head with a 12/14 titanium sleeve was used on a non-compatible femoral stem from a manufacturer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39127312
pii: S0883-5403(24)00806-4
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Sebastian Simon (S)

Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopedic Research, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria; AUVA Trauma Center Meidling, Kundratstr. 37, 1120, Vienna, Austria.

Jan Pawlik (J)

Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopedic Research, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria.

Jennyfer A Mitterer (JA)

Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopedic Research, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria; 2(nd) Department, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria.

Stephanie Huber (S)

Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopedic Research, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria; 2(nd) Department, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria.

Martin Dominkus (M)

2(nd) Department, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria.

Jochen G Hofstaetter (JG)

Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopedic Research, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria; 2(nd) Department, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: researchlab@oss.at.

Classifications MeSH