Reporting Clinical Endpoints in Studies of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery.


Journal

Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1549-4713
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802443

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 27 06 2024
revised: 22 07 2024
accepted: 29 07 2024
medline: 11 8 2024
pubmed: 11 8 2024
entrez: 10 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) refers to a group of procedures generally characterized by an ab interno approach, minimal trauma to ocular tissue, moderate efficacy, an excellent safety profile, and rapid recovery. The number of MIGS procedures continues to increase, and their use has become widespread among glaucoma and cataract specialists. Standardization of the methodology and reporting of clinical endpoints in MIGS investigations enhances interpretation and comparison across different studies. The assessment of surgical interventions should not only consider statistical significance, but also whether the outcome is meaningful to patients. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is defined as the smallest change in a treatment outcome that is considered beneficial for an individual patient and prompts a change in their clinical management, and expert consensus is an accepted approach to determine the MCID. The American Academy of Ophthalmology's Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern Panel is an expert panel that develops guidelines identifying characteristics and components of quality eye care. The panel recommends that the cumulative probability of surgical success at 2 years with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis be used as the primary efficacy endpoint in MIGS studies. The panel suggests that surgical success for standalone MIGS be defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 21 mmHg and reduced ≥ 20% from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medications, additional laser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony. The proposed MCID for the cumulative probability of success of standalone MIGS at 2 years is 50%. The panel recommends that surgical success for MIGS combined with cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation (CE-IOL) be defined as a decrease in glaucoma medical therapy ≥ 1 medication from baseline without an increase in IOP, or IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and reduced ≥ 20% from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medications, additional laser or incisional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, or hypotony. The suggested MCID for the cumulative probability of success for CE-IOL/MIGS at 2 years is 65%.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39127407
pii: S0161-6420(24)00456-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.07.030
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Steven J Gedde (SJ)

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Kateki Vinod (K)

Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Eileen C Bowden (EC)

Mitchel and Shannon Wong Eye Institute, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Natasha N Kolomeyer (NN)

Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Vikas Chopra (V)

Doheny and Stein Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Pratap Challa (P)

Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Donald L Budenz (DL)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Michael X Repka (MX)

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Flora Lum (F)

American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: flum@aao.org.

Classifications MeSH