How can health systems approach reducing health inequalities? An in-depth qualitative case study in the UK.
Complex whole systems approach
Health inequalities
In-depth qualitative case study
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Aug 2024
10 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
20
10
2023
accepted:
18
07
2024
medline:
11
8
2024
pubmed:
11
8
2024
entrez:
10
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Addressing socioeconomic inequalities in health and healthcare, and reducing avoidable hospital admissions requires integrated strategy and complex intervention across health systems. However, the understanding of how to create effective systems to reduce socio-economic inequalities in health and healthcare is limited. The aim was to explore and develop a system's level understanding of how local areas address health inequalities with a focus on avoidable emergency admissions. In-depth case study using qualitative investigation (documentary analysis and key informant interviews) in an urban UK local authority. Interviewees were identified using snowball sampling. Documents were retrieved via key informants and web searches of relevant organisations. Interviews and documents were analysed independently based on a thematic analysis approach. Interviews (n = 14) with wide representation from local authority (n = 8), NHS (n = 5) and voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector (n = 1) with 75 documents (including from NHS, local authority, VCSE) were included. Cross-referenced themes were understanding the local context, facilitators of how to tackle health inequalities: the assets, and emerging risks and concerns. Addressing health inequalities in avoidable admissions per se was not often explicitly linked by either the interviews or documents and is not yet embedded into practice. However, a strong coherent strategic integrated population health management plan with a system's approach to reducing health inequalities was evident as was collective action and involving people, with links to a "strong third sector". Challenges reported include structural barriers and threats, the analysis and accessibility of data as well as ongoing pressures on the health and care system. We provide an in-depth exploration of how a local area is working to address health and care inequalities. Key elements of this system's working include fostering strategic coherence, cross-agency working, and community-asset based approaches. Areas requiring action included data sharing challenges across organisations and analytical capacity to assist endeavours to reduce health and care inequalities. Other areas were around the resilience of the system including the recruitment and retention of the workforce. More action is required to embed reducing health inequalities in avoidable admissions explicitly in local areas with inaction risking widening the health gap.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Addressing socioeconomic inequalities in health and healthcare, and reducing avoidable hospital admissions requires integrated strategy and complex intervention across health systems. However, the understanding of how to create effective systems to reduce socio-economic inequalities in health and healthcare is limited. The aim was to explore and develop a system's level understanding of how local areas address health inequalities with a focus on avoidable emergency admissions.
METHODS
METHODS
In-depth case study using qualitative investigation (documentary analysis and key informant interviews) in an urban UK local authority. Interviewees were identified using snowball sampling. Documents were retrieved via key informants and web searches of relevant organisations. Interviews and documents were analysed independently based on a thematic analysis approach.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Interviews (n = 14) with wide representation from local authority (n = 8), NHS (n = 5) and voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector (n = 1) with 75 documents (including from NHS, local authority, VCSE) were included. Cross-referenced themes were understanding the local context, facilitators of how to tackle health inequalities: the assets, and emerging risks and concerns. Addressing health inequalities in avoidable admissions per se was not often explicitly linked by either the interviews or documents and is not yet embedded into practice. However, a strong coherent strategic integrated population health management plan with a system's approach to reducing health inequalities was evident as was collective action and involving people, with links to a "strong third sector". Challenges reported include structural barriers and threats, the analysis and accessibility of data as well as ongoing pressures on the health and care system.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We provide an in-depth exploration of how a local area is working to address health and care inequalities. Key elements of this system's working include fostering strategic coherence, cross-agency working, and community-asset based approaches. Areas requiring action included data sharing challenges across organisations and analytical capacity to assist endeavours to reduce health and care inequalities. Other areas were around the resilience of the system including the recruitment and retention of the workforce. More action is required to embed reducing health inequalities in avoidable admissions explicitly in local areas with inaction risking widening the health gap.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39127652
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19531-5
pii: 10.1186/s12889-024-19531-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2168Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Sweden: Institute for Future Studies Stockholm; 1991.
Commission on Social Determinants of Health (CSDH). Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2008.
Marmot M, et al. Fair Society, Healthy Lives (The Marmot Review). London: The Marmot Review; 2010.
Academy of Medical Sciences, Improving the health of the public by 2040: optimising the research environment for a healthier, fairer future. London: The Academy of Medical Sciences; 2016.
Rutter H, et al. The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. The Lancet. 2017;390(10112):2602–4.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31267-9
Diez Roux AV. Complex systems thinking and current impasses in health disparities research. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(9):1627–34.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300149
pubmed: 21778505
pmcid: 3154209
Foster-Fishman PG, Nowell B, Yang H. Putting the system back into systems change: a framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;39(3–4):197–215.
doi: 10.1007/s10464-007-9109-0
pubmed: 17510791
World Health Organisation (WHO). The World Health Report 2000 health systems: improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2000.
Papanicolas I, et al. Health system performance assessment: a framework for policy analysis in Health Policy Series, No. 57. Geneva: World Heath Organisation; 2022.
Bartley M. Health Inequalities: An Introduction to Theories, Concepts and Methods. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2004.
World Health Organization and Finland Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Health in all policies: Helsinki statement. Framework for country action. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2014.
Marmot M, et al. Health equity in England: The Marmot Review 10 years on. London: Institute of Health Equity; 2020.
Bambra C, et al. Reducing health inequalities in priority public health conditions: using rapid review to develop proposals for evidence-based policy. J Public Health. 2010;32(4):496–505.
doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq028
Public Health England, Community-centred public health. Taking a whole system approach. London: Public Health England; 2020.
Davey F, et al. Levelling up health: a practical, evidence-based framework for reducing health inequalities. Public Health in Pract. 2022;4:100322.
doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100322
Public Health England (PHE). Place-based approaches to reducing health inequalities. PHE; 2021.
Ford J, et al. Transforming health systems to reduce health inequalities. Future Healthc J. 2021;8(2):e204–9.
doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0018
pubmed: 34286186
pmcid: 8285147
Olivera JN, et al. Conceptualisation of health inequalities by local healthcare systems: a document analysis. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(6):e3977–84.
doi: 10.1111/hsc.13791
pubmed: 35355359
pmcid: 10084138
Department of Health (DoH). Health and Social Care Act 2012. 2012.
Department of Health (DoH). Health and social care act 2022. 2022.
Department of Health (DoH). Statutory guidance on joint strategic needs assessments and joint health and wellbeing strategies. London: Department of Health; 2013.
Asaria M, Doran T, Cookson R. The costs of inequality: whole-population modelling study of lifetime inpatient hospital costs in the English National health service by level of neighbourhood deprivation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70:990–6.
doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207447
pubmed: 27189975
Castro AC, et al. Local NHS equity trends and their wider determinants: a pilot study of data on emergency admissions. 2020. https://www.york.ac.uk/media/healthsciences/documents/research/Local_NHS_Equity_Trends.pdf .
Nuffield Trust. Potentially preventable emergency admissions. 2023. Available from: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/potentially-preventable-emergency-hospital-admissions#background .
Cookson R, Asaria M, Ali S, Ferguson B, Fleetcroft R, Goddard M, et al. Health Equity Indicators for the English NHS: a longitudinal whole-population study at the small-area level. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2016;4(26). https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr04260
Roland M, Abel G. Reducing emergency admissions: are we on the right track? BMJ. 2012;345:e6017.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6017
pubmed: 22990102
Moore GF, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258
pubmed: 25791983
pmcid: 4366184
Petticrew M. Public health evaluation: epistemological challenges to evidence production and use. Evid Policy. 2013;9:87–95.
doi: 10.1332/174426413X663742
Adam T. Advancing the application of systems thinking in health. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12(1):1–5.
doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-50
Leischow SJ, et al. Systems thinking to improve the public’s health. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:S196–203.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.014
pubmed: 18619400
pmcid: 3940421
Paparini S, et al. Evaluating complex interventions in context: systematic, meta-narrative review of case study approaches. BMC Med Res Methodo. 2021;21(1):225.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01418-3
McGill E, et al. Qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective: a systematic review and framework for public health evaluators. PLoS Med. 2020;17(11):e1003368.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003368
pubmed: 33137099
pmcid: 7605618
Paparini S, et al. Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):301.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01777-6
pubmed: 33167974
pmcid: 7652677
Crowe S, et al. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:100.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
pubmed: 21707982
pmcid: 3141799
Ford J, et al. Reducing inequality in avoidable emergency admissions: case studies of local health care systems in England using a realist approach. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2021;27:27(1).
Stake RE. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage; 1995.
Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government and Department for Levelling Up Housing and Communities. English indices of deprivation 2015. 2015. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015 .
Whitehead M. Due North: the report of the Inequiry on Health Equity for the North. 2014.
Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. California: Sage Publications Inc.; 2014.
Castro Avila AC, et al. Local equity data packs for England 2009-2018. 2019. Available from: https://www.york.ac.uk/che/research/equity/monitoring/packs/ .
Yin RK. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018.
Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2002.
Sowden S, et al. Interventions to reduce inequalities in avoidable hospital admissions: explanatory framework and systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e035429.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035429
pubmed: 32709641
pmcid: 7380849
Dalglish SL, Kalid H, McMahon SA. Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approach. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35(10):1424–31.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa064
pmcid: 7886435
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Robson C, McCartan K. Real World Research. 4th ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2016.
Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J. 2009;9(2):27–40.
doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
Robson C, McCartan K. Real World Research. 4th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2016.
Moran-Ellis J, et al. Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications. Qual Res. 2006;6(1):45–59.
doi: 10.1177/1468794106058870
Parbery-Clark C, et al. Coproduction of a resource sharing public views of health inequalities: an example of inclusive public and patient involvement and engagement. Health Expectations. 2023:27(1):e13860.
Stansfield J, South J, Mapplethorpe T. What are the elements of a whole system approach to community-centred public health? A qualitative study with public health leaders in England’s local authority areas. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e036044.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036044
pubmed: 32847905
pmcid: 7451485
Shams L, Akbari SA, Yazdani S. Values in health policy - a concept analysis. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;1(5):623–30.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.102
NHS England. Core20PLUS5 (adults) – an approach to reducing healthcare inequalities. 2021 11/03/2023]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/about/equality/equality-hub/national-healthcare-inequalities-improvement-programme/core20plus5/ .
Charles A. Integrated care systems explained: making sense of systems, places and neighbourhoods. 2022 24/09/2023]; Available from: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/integrated-care-systems-explained .
Elwell-Sutton T, et al. Creating healthy lives: a whole-government approach to long-term investment in the nation's health. London: The Health Foundation; 2019.
Buck D, Baylis A, Dougall D. A vision for population health: towards a healthier future. London, UK: The Kings Fund; 2018.
Popay J, et al. System resilience and neighbourhood action on social determinants of health inequalities: an english case study. Perspect Public Health. 2022;142(4):213–23.
doi: 10.1177/17579139221106899
pubmed: 35801904
pmcid: 9284076
Asaria M, et al. How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(7):637–43.
doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206742
pubmed: 26787198
Daniel KD. Introduction to systems thinking. Pegasus Communications, Inc; 1999.
Jessiman PE, et al. A systems map of determinants of child health inequalities in England at the local level. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(2):e0245577.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245577
pubmed: 33577596
pmcid: 7880458
Sleeman KE, et al. Is end-of-life a priority for policymakers? Qualitative documentary analysis of health care strategies. Palliat Med. 2018;32(9):1464–84.
doi: 10.1177/0269216318786333