Impact of Microsurgical Reconstruction Timing on the Risk of Free Flap Loss in Acute Burns: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.


Journal

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 30 08 2023
accepted: 12 04 2024
medline: 12 8 2024
pubmed: 12 8 2024
entrez: 12 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Free tissue transfer is usually considered as a last resort in severe burn cases, when skin substitutes and local flaps are not viable options. Prior studies have demonstrated a free flap loss rate ranging from 0% to 44%. The aim of this study is to identify the ideal timing to perform free flap reconstruction in acute burn-related injuries to minimize free flap loss. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were queried. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO database (CRD42023404478). Three time intervals from day of injury were identified: (1) 0-4 days, (2) 5-21 days, and (3) 22 days-6 weeks. The primary outcome was total free flap loss. A total of 17 articles met inclusion criteria. The analysis included 275 free flaps performed in 260 patients (88% men, 12% women) affected by acute burn injuries. The pooled prevalence of free flap failure in the three time intervals (0-4 days, 5-21 days, and 22 days-6 weeks) were 7.32% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.38%-20.37%], 16.55% (95% CI: 11.35%-23.51%), and 6.74% (95% CI: 3.06%-14.20%), respectively. Free flap reconstruction carries a high risk of failure in patients with acute burn. However, timing of the reconstruction appears to influence surgical outcomes. Free flap reconstruction performed between 5 and 21 days from burn injury had a trend toward higher flap loss rates and should be discouraged.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Free tissue transfer is usually considered as a last resort in severe burn cases, when skin substitutes and local flaps are not viable options. Prior studies have demonstrated a free flap loss rate ranging from 0% to 44%. The aim of this study is to identify the ideal timing to perform free flap reconstruction in acute burn-related injuries to minimize free flap loss.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were queried. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO database (CRD42023404478). Three time intervals from day of injury were identified: (1) 0-4 days, (2) 5-21 days, and (3) 22 days-6 weeks. The primary outcome was total free flap loss.
Results UNASSIGNED
A total of 17 articles met inclusion criteria. The analysis included 275 free flaps performed in 260 patients (88% men, 12% women) affected by acute burn injuries. The pooled prevalence of free flap failure in the three time intervals (0-4 days, 5-21 days, and 22 days-6 weeks) were 7.32% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.38%-20.37%], 16.55% (95% CI: 11.35%-23.51%), and 6.74% (95% CI: 3.06%-14.20%), respectively.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Free flap reconstruction carries a high risk of failure in patients with acute burn. However, timing of the reconstruction appears to influence surgical outcomes. Free flap reconstruction performed between 5 and 21 days from burn injury had a trend toward higher flap loss rates and should be discouraged.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39129846
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006025
pii: GOX-D-23-00785
pmc: PMC11315486
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e6025

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Auteurs

Mario Alessandri-Bonetti (M)

From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Julia A Kasmirski (JA)

From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Hilary Y Liu (HY)

From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Alain C Corcos (AC)

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Jenny A Ziembicki (JA)

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Guy M Stofman (GM)

From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Francesco M Egro (FM)

From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Classifications MeSH