Program Directors Survey on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiology Fellowship Training.

COVID-19 cardiology fellowship graduate medical education pandemic program director

Journal

JACC. Advances
ISSN: 2772-963X
Titre abrégé: JACC Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918419284106676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 15 11 2023
revised: 09 02 2024
accepted: 11 03 2024
medline: 12 8 2024
pubmed: 12 8 2024
entrez: 12 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed unprecedented changes to medical education, including CV fellowship programs. CV fellowship PDs offer a unique perspective regarding the impact of the pandemic on CV medical education. The 4th annual Cardiovascular Diseases (CV) Fellowship Program Directors (PDs) Survey sought to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CV fellows and fellowship programs. The survey contained 31 items examining the clinical, educational, and academic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CV fellowship programs. Survey response rate was 54%. Most respondents (58%) represented university-based programs. Most PDs felt that changes to clinical practice during the COVID-19 negatively impacted fellow education in cardiac catheterization (66%), outpatient cardiology (52%), nuclear imaging (51%), and echocardiography (50%). Despite improving attendance, 75% of PDs felt that virtual educational conferences adversely impacted interaction between participants. Only 22% felt they improved fellow education. Most PDs (85%) reported a negative impact of the pandemic on fellow well-being and burnout, and 57% reported a decrease in research productivity among fellows. Even though virtual recruitment allowed programs to interview more competitive candidates, most PDs felt that virtual interviews adversely impacted interactions between their fellows and candidates (71%) and their ability to convey the culture of their program (60%). Most CV fellowship PDs felt the COVID-19 pandemic brought changes that negatively impacted the clinical training, didactic learning, academic productivity, and well-being among cardiology fellows. The implications of these changes on the competency of cardiologists that trained during the COVID-19 pandemic deserve future study.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed unprecedented changes to medical education, including CV fellowship programs. CV fellowship PDs offer a unique perspective regarding the impact of the pandemic on CV medical education.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
The 4th annual Cardiovascular Diseases (CV) Fellowship Program Directors (PDs) Survey sought to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CV fellows and fellowship programs.
Methods UNASSIGNED
The survey contained 31 items examining the clinical, educational, and academic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CV fellowship programs.
Results UNASSIGNED
Survey response rate was 54%. Most respondents (58%) represented university-based programs. Most PDs felt that changes to clinical practice during the COVID-19 negatively impacted fellow education in cardiac catheterization (66%), outpatient cardiology (52%), nuclear imaging (51%), and echocardiography (50%). Despite improving attendance, 75% of PDs felt that virtual educational conferences adversely impacted interaction between participants. Only 22% felt they improved fellow education. Most PDs (85%) reported a negative impact of the pandemic on fellow well-being and burnout, and 57% reported a decrease in research productivity among fellows. Even though virtual recruitment allowed programs to interview more competitive candidates, most PDs felt that virtual interviews adversely impacted interactions between their fellows and candidates (71%) and their ability to convey the culture of their program (60%).
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Most CV fellowship PDs felt the COVID-19 pandemic brought changes that negatively impacted the clinical training, didactic learning, academic productivity, and well-being among cardiology fellows. The implications of these changes on the competency of cardiologists that trained during the COVID-19 pandemic deserve future study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39130007
doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101008
pii: S2772-963X(24)00197-2
pmc: PMC11312764
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101008

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr Theriot is a paid employee of the American College of Cardiology. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Auteurs

Michael W Cullen (MW)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Julie B Damp (JB)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Victor Soukoulis (V)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Friederike K Keating (FK)

Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

Islam Abudayyeh (I)

Department of Medicine, Charles Drew Univ. Loma Linda Veterans Healthcare, Loma Linda, California, USA.

Eric H Yang (EH)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Meera Kondapaneni (M)

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Donna M Polk (DM)

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Lisa J Rose-Jones (LJ)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Paul Theriot (P)

American College of Cardiology, Washington, DC, USA.

Gaby Weissman (G)

Department of Cardiology, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Classifications MeSH