The Role of Verbal Auditory Hallucinations in Influencing and Retrospectively Predicting Physical Harm Prevalence in Early Psychosis.

Early intervention in psychosis First episode psychosis Physical harm Psychosis Quality improvement project Violence

Journal

Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH
ISSN: 1745-0179
Titre abrégé: Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health
Pays: United Arab Emirates
ID NLM: 101245735

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 09 10 2023
revised: 11 03 2024
accepted: 18 03 2024
medline: 12 8 2024
pubmed: 12 8 2024
entrez: 12 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Research has established a relationship between psychosis and physical harm in the early course of psychosis. However, little is known about the relationship between specific psychosis symptoms, such as hearing voices, and physical harm. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and typology of physical harm related to hearing voices, as well as what aspects of the voice-hearing experience retrospectively predicted incidents of harm within an Early Intervention in Psychosis Service (EIPS). We conducted a quality improvement project in a single EIPS. We reviewed case notes of patients and extracted information on the cognitive-phenomenological features of the voices patients heard, as well as any incidents of physical harm that were causally linked to these voices. It was found that 32.2% of EI patients had an actual incident of physical harm in their case notes that was causally linked to hearing voices. The most common type of physical harm was neglect. In terms of cognitive phenomenological binary correlations that retrospectively predicted physical harm in the case notes, patients were 20 and 7 times more likely to have harmed themselves if they heard self-harm commands ( Verbal auditory hallucinations commonly influence physical harm in the early course of psychosis. Hearing commands and/or believing the voice to be omnipotent are strong retrospective-correlative predictors that may aid in the assessment and therapeutic intervention.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Research has established a relationship between psychosis and physical harm in the early course of psychosis. However, little is known about the relationship between specific psychosis symptoms, such as hearing voices, and physical harm.
Objective UNASSIGNED
This study aimed to determine the prevalence and typology of physical harm related to hearing voices, as well as what aspects of the voice-hearing experience retrospectively predicted incidents of harm within an Early Intervention in Psychosis Service (EIPS).
Methods UNASSIGNED
We conducted a quality improvement project in a single EIPS. We reviewed case notes of patients and extracted information on the cognitive-phenomenological features of the voices patients heard, as well as any incidents of physical harm that were causally linked to these voices.
Results UNASSIGNED
It was found that 32.2% of EI patients had an actual incident of physical harm in their case notes that was causally linked to hearing voices. The most common type of physical harm was neglect. In terms of cognitive phenomenological binary correlations that retrospectively predicted physical harm in the case notes, patients were 20 and 7 times more likely to have harmed themselves if they heard self-harm commands (
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Verbal auditory hallucinations commonly influence physical harm in the early course of psychosis. Hearing commands and/or believing the voice to be omnipotent are strong retrospective-correlative predictors that may aid in the assessment and therapeutic intervention.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39130189
doi: 10.2174/0117450179286452240520070533
pii: CPEMH-20-E17450179286452
pmc: PMC11311800
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e17450179286452

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

Auteurs

Cassie M Hazell (CM)

Department of Psychological Interventions, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.

Sophia Hasapopoulos (S)

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Jennifer McGowan (J)

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

Roman Hamza (R)

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Zareena Ahmed (Z)

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Ben Gaughan (B)

Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Monica Huerga Malillos (MH)

Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Amber Gill (A)

Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Amber Nomani (A)

Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Emily Hickson (E)

Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Anjeza Koruni (A)

Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Faaisa Islam (F)

Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Jonathan Souray (J)

Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

David Raune (D)

Harrow and Hillingdon Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH