Exploring the distribution and habitat preferences of Polytrichaceae (Bryophyta) in Tibet, China.

Environmental variables MaxEnt model Polytrichaceae Potential suitable habitats Tibet

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 07 04 2023
revised: 19 06 2024
accepted: 10 07 2024
medline: 12 8 2024
pubmed: 12 8 2024
entrez: 12 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau stands as one of the most ecologically fragile and biodiversity-rich regions globally. Understanding the distribution of different taxa and their relationship with environmental factors is crucial for effective conservation and sustainable management. Polytrichaceae, a significant bryophyte family widely distributed in Tibet, displays distinct structural, morphological, and phylogenetic traits compared to other mosses. Despite its importance, the distribution of Polytrichaceae in Tibet and its correlation with environmental factors have yet to be explored. In this study, we used an optimized Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) model to explore the potential suitable habitats of Polytrichaceae in Tibet, aiming to clarify their geographic distribution pattern as well as the key environmental influence factors. The model had high accuracy with an average Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.933 and True Skill Statistics (TSS) value of 0.789. The results showed that the potential suitability habitats of Polytrichaceae were mainly located in southeastern Tibet, and the low suitable, moderately suitable, and highly suitable habitats accounted for 12.53 %, 6.84 %, and 3.31 % of the total area of Tibet respectively. Unsuitable habitats were mainly located in northwestern Tibet, accounting for about 77.32 %. In Tibet, temperature factors (Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarter (Bio11) and Annual Mean Temperature (Bio1)) played a pivotal role in determining the potential suitable habitats for Polytrichaceae, and elevation, precipitation, and vegetation coverage also had an important influence. The family preferred warm, moist and densely vegetated habitats in Tibet. This study enriched our ecological understanding of bryophyte ecology in this region and provided data-driven support for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management in Tibet.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39130443
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34515
pii: S2405-8440(24)10546-4
pmc: PMC11315192
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e34515

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Xiaotong Song (X)

College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.

Jiqi Gu (J)

College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.

Ling Liu (L)

College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.

Yujia Liao (Y)

College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.

Heping Ma (H)

Institute of Tibet Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agricultural & Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi, Tibet, 860000, China.
Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology in Tibet Plateau, Tibet Agricultural & Animal Husbandry University, Ministry of Education, Nyingchi, Tibet, 860000, China.

Ruihong Wang (R)

Institute of Tibet Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agricultural & Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi, Tibet, 860000, China.
Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology in Tibet Plateau, Tibet Agricultural & Animal Husbandry University, Ministry of Education, Nyingchi, Tibet, 860000, China.

Yanhui Ye (Y)

Resources & Environment College, Tibet Agriculture & Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi, Tibet, 860000, China.

Ji Li (J)

College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.

Xiaoming Shao (X)

College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Resources & Environment College, Tibet Agriculture & Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi, Tibet, 860000, China.

Classifications MeSH