Impact of Antiplatelet Therapy on 5-Year Outcomes After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Deferral of Revascularization in Nonsignificant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.
Antiplatelet therapy
Coronary artery disease
Fractional flow reserve
Journal
Circulation reports
ISSN: 2434-0790
Titre abrégé: Circ Rep
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101746642
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Aug 2024
09 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
25
06
2024
accepted:
25
06
2024
medline:
12
8
2024
pubmed:
12
8
2024
entrez:
12
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Because the clinical benefit of antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease (CAD) remains poorly understood, we evaluated it in patients after fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided deferral of revascularization. From the J-CONFIRM (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients with Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), we investigated 265 patients with deferred lesions who did not require APT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A 2-year landmark analysis assessed the relationship between APT at 2 years and 5-year major cardiac adverse events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization). Of the 265 patients, 163 (61.5%) received APT. The 5-year MACE did not significantly differ between the APT and non-APT groups after adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics (9.2% vs. 6.9%, inverse probability weighted hazard ratio, 1.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.53-3.69]; P=0.49). There was a marginal interaction between the effect of APT on MACE and FFR values (< or ≥0.84) (P for interaction=0.066). The 5-year outcomes after FFR-guided deferral of revascularization did not significantly differ between the APT and non-APT groups, suggesting that APT might not be a critical requirement for nonsignificant obstructive CAD patients not requiring APT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Because the clinical benefit of antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease (CAD) remains poorly understood, we evaluated it in patients after fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided deferral of revascularization.
Methods and Results
UNASSIGNED
From the J-CONFIRM (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients with Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), we investigated 265 patients with deferred lesions who did not require APT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A 2-year landmark analysis assessed the relationship between APT at 2 years and 5-year major cardiac adverse events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization). Of the 265 patients, 163 (61.5%) received APT. The 5-year MACE did not significantly differ between the APT and non-APT groups after adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics (9.2% vs. 6.9%, inverse probability weighted hazard ratio, 1.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.53-3.69]; P=0.49). There was a marginal interaction between the effect of APT on MACE and FFR values (< or ≥0.84) (P for interaction=0.066).
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
The 5-year outcomes after FFR-guided deferral of revascularization did not significantly differ between the APT and non-APT groups, suggesting that APT might not be a critical requirement for nonsignificant obstructive CAD patients not requiring APT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39132333
doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0069
pmc: PMC11309776
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
313-321Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
S.K. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan and Boston Scientific Japan; H.M. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan, Boston Scientific Japan, and Phillips Japan; Y.K. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan and Phillips Japan; Y.S. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan and Phillips Japan; T.A. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan and Phillips Japan; K.T. is a member of Circulation Journal’s and Circulation Reports’ Editorial Team; N.T. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan and Boston Scientific Japan; H.Y. receives lecture fees from Boston Scientific Japan. The other authors report no conflicts.