Immersion in dual-language programs does not impede children's native language processing.

Bilingualism dual-language immersion lexical processing majority-language speakers morphosyntactic processing

Journal

The international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior
ISSN: 1367-0069
Titre abrégé: Int J Billing
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101512448

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 12 8 2024
pubmed: 12 8 2024
entrez: 12 8 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The benefits of dual-language immersion (DLI) versus English-only classrooms for minority-language speakers' acquisition of English have been well documented. However, less is known about the effect(s) of DLI on majority-language speakers' native English skills. Prior studies largely used accuracy-focused measures to index children's language skills; it is possible that processing-based tasks are more sensitive to the effects of DLI experience. Thirty-three monolingual native English-speaking children attending English-only classrooms and thirty-three English-speaking children attending English-Spanish DLI matched in age, gender, nonverbal IQ, and socio-economic status were tested twice, 1 year apart, on standardized and processing-based measures of English vocabulary and morphosyntax. We ran linear mixed-effects models to examine the extent to which group and time would predict scores on knowledge-based measures of vocabulary and morphosyntactic knowledge, as well as accuracy and reaction times on processing-based measures of English vocabulary and morphosyntax. Results revealed comparable levels of growth in English for both groups. A subtle effect of DLI was observed on a lexical-decision task: bilinguals were slower in Year 1 but both groups were equally efficient in Year 2. These results indicate that DLI programs have minimal impact on majority-language speakers' native-language skills in the age-range tested. This study is the first to longitudinally examine processing-based native language outcomes in bilingual children in DLI classrooms. We do not find evidence that DLI exposure carries a cost to native language development, even when indexed by processing measures. This should reassure parents, educators, and policymakers in that there are no downsides to DLI.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39132643
doi: 10.1177/13670069221122679
pmc: PMC11315431
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

815-841

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Anne Neveu (A)

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

Ishanti Gangopadhyay (I)

Indiana University, Bloomington.

Susan Ellis Weismer (SE)

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

Margarita Kaushanskaya (M)

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

Classifications MeSH