Sample Size Calculation Under Nonproportional Hazards Using Average Hazard Ratios.

effect measure hazard ratio log‐rank test sample size simulation study survival analysis time‐to‐event data

Journal

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
ISSN: 1521-4036
Titre abrégé: Biom J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7708048

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Historique:
revised: 18 03 2024
received: 05 10 2023
accepted: 28 04 2024
medline: 12 8 2024
pubmed: 12 8 2024
entrez: 12 8 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Many clinical trials assess time-to-event endpoints. To describe the difference between groups in terms of time to event, we often employ hazard ratios. However, the hazard ratio is only informative in the case of proportional hazards (PHs) over time. There exist many other effect measures that do not require PHs. One of them is the average hazard ratio (AHR). Its core idea is to utilize a time-dependent weighting function that accounts for time variation. Though propagated in methodological research papers, the AHR is rarely used in practice. To facilitate its application, we unfold approaches for sample size calculation of an AHR test. We assess the reliability of the sample size calculation by extensive simulation studies covering various survival and censoring distributions with proportional as well as nonproportional hazards (N-PHs). The findings suggest that a simulation-based sample size calculation approach can be useful for designing clinical trials with N-PHs. Using the AHR can result in increased statistical power to detect differences between groups with more efficient sample sizes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39132909
doi: 10.1002/bimj.202300271
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e202300271

Subventions

Organisme : Research Center Trustworthy Data Science and Security
Organisme : DFG

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Biometrical Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH.

Références

Alexander, B. M., J. D. Schoenfeld, and L. Trippa. 2018. “Hazards of Hazard Ratios‐Deviations From Model Assumptions in Immunotherapy.” New England Journal of Medicine 378, no. 12: 1158–1159.
Ananthakrishnan, R., S. Green, A. Previtali, R. Liu, D. Li, and M. LaValley. 2021. “Critical Review of Oncology Clinical Trial Design Under Non‐Proportional Hazards.” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 162: 103350.
Brückner, M., and W. Brannath. 2017. “Sequential Tests for Non‐Proportional Hazards Data.” Lifetime Data Analysis 23, no. 3: 339–352.
Brueckner, M. 2018. Ahr. https://github.com/cran/AHR.
Chen, L. M., J. G. Ibrahim, and H. Chu. 2011. “Sample Size and Power Determination in Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Survival Data.” Statistics in Medicine 30, no. 18: 2295–2309.
Chen, Q., D. Zeng, J. G. Ibrahim, M.‐H. Chen, Z. Pan, and X. Xue. 2015. “Quantifying the Average of the Time‐Varying Hazard Ratio via a Class of Transformations.” Lifetime Data Analysis 21: 259–279.
Chi, Y.‐Y., and J. G. Ibrahim. 2006. “Joint Models for Multivariate Longitudinal and Multivariate Survival Data.” Biometrics 62, no. 2: 432–445.
Cortés, Martínez, J., R. B. Geskus, K. Kim, and G. G. Melis. 2021. “Using the Geometric Average Hazard Ratio in Sample Size Calculation for Time‐to‐Event Data With Composite Endpoints.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 21, no. 1: 1–14.
Davison, A. C., and D. V. Hinkley. 1997. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dobler, D., and M. Pauly. 2018. “Bootstrap‐ and Permutation‐Based Inference for the Mann–Whitney Effect for Right‐Censored and Tied Data.” TEST 27, no. 3: 639–658.
Dobler, D., and M. Pauly. 2020. “Factorial Analyses of Treatment Effects Under Independent Right‐Censoring.” Statistical Methods in Medical Research 29, no. 2: 325–343.
Dunkler, D., M. Ploner, M. Schemper, and G. Heinze. 2018. “Weighted Cox Regression Using the R Package Coxphw.” Journal of Statistical Software 84, no. 2: 1–26.
Fradet, Y., J. Bellmunt, D. Vaughn, et al. 2019. “Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE‐045 Trial of Pembrolizumab Versus Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine in Recurrent Advanced Urothelial Cancer: Results of >2$>2$ Years of Follow‐Up.” Annals of Oncology 30, no. 6: 970–976.
Freedman, L. S. 1982. “Tables of the Number of Patients Required in Clinical Trials Using the Logrank Test.” Statistics in Medicine 1, no. 2: 121–129.
Gorfine, M., M. Schlesinger, and L. Hsu. 2020. “K‐Sample Omnibus Non‐Proportional Hazards Tests Based on Right‐Censored Data.” Statistical Methods in Medical Research 29, no. 10: 2830–2850.
Guyot, P., A. Ades, M. J. Ouwens, and N. J. Welton. 2012. “Enhanced Secondary Analysis of Survival Data: Reconstructing the Data From Published Kaplan–Meier Survival Curves.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 12, no. 1: 9.
Hasegawa, T. 2014. “Sample Size Determination for the Weighted Log‐Rank Test With the Fleming–Harrington Class of Weights in Cancer Vaccine Studies.” Pharmaceutical Statistics 13, no. 2: 128–135.
Horiguchi, M., and H. Uno. 2017. SSRMST: Sample Size Calculation Using Restricted Mean Survival Time. R package version 0.1.1.
Kalbfleisch, J. D. 1981. “Estimation of the Average Hazard Ratio.” Biometrika 68, no. 1: 105–112.
Kieser, M. 2020. Methods and Applications of Sample Size Calculation and Recalculation in Clinical Trials. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Kim, Y., J. K. Park, and G. Kim. 2011. “Bayesian Analysis for Monotone Hazard Ratio.” Lifetime Data Analysis 17: 302–320.
Koziol, J. A., and Z. Jia. 2009. “The Concordance Index C and the Mann–Whitney Parameter Pr (X >$>$ Y) With Randomly Censored Data.” Biometrical Journal: Journal of Mathematical Methods in Biosciences 51, no. 3: 467–474.
Lakatos, E. 1986. “Sample Size Determination in Clinical Trials With Time‐Dependent Rates of Losses and Noncompliance.” Controlled Clinical Trials 7, no. 3: 189–199.
Lin, R. S., J. Lin, S. Roychoudhury, et al. 2020. “Alternative Analysis Methods for Time to Event Endpoints Under Nonproportional Hazards: A Comparative Analysis.” Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research 12, no. 2: 187–198.
Mann, H. B., and D. R. Whitney. 1947. “On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger Than the Other.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18, no. 1: 50–60.
Mick, R., and T.‐T. Chen. 2015. “Statistical Challenges in the Design of Late‐Stage Cancer Immunotherapy Studies.” Cancer Immunology Research 3, no. 12: 1292–1298.
Phadnis, M. A., and M. S. Mayo. 2021. “Sample Size Calculation for Two‐Arm Trials With Time‐to‐Event Endpoint for Nonproportional Hazards Using the Concept of Relative Time When Inference is Built on Comparing Weibull Distributions.” Biometrical Journal 63, no. 7: 1406–1433.
R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rauch, G., W. Brannath, M. Brückner, and M. Kieser. 2018. “The Average Hazard Ratio – A Good Effect Measure for Time‐to‐Event Endpoints When the Proportional Hazard Assumption is Violated?” Methods of Information in Medicine 57, no. 3: 89–100.
Rauch, G., S. Schüler, and M. Kieser. 2017. Planning and Analyzing Clinical Trials With Composite Endpoints. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Rohatgi, A. 2019. Webplotdigitizer: Version 4.4. https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer.
Royston, P. 2018. “Power and Sample‐Size Analysis for the Royston–Parmar Combined Test in Clinical Trials With a Time‐to‐Event Outcome.” Stata Journal 18, no. 1: 3–21.
Royston, P., and M. K. Parmar. 2011. “The Use of Restricted Mean Survival Time to Estimate the Treatment Effect in Randomized Clinical Trials When the Proportional Hazards Assumption is in Doubt.” Statistics in Medicine 30, no. 19: 2409–2421.
Royston, P., and M. K. Parmar. 2013. “Restricted Mean Survival Time: An Alternative to the Hazard Ratio for the Design and Analysis of Randomized Trials With a Time‐to‐Event Outcome.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 13, no. 1: 1–15.
Royston, P., and M. K. Parmar. 2016. “Augmenting the Logrank Test in the Design of Clinical Trials in Which Non‐Proportional Hazards of the Treatment Effect may be Anticipated.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 16, no. 1: 1–13.
Schemper, M. 1992. “Cox Analysis of Survival Data With Non‐Proportional Hazard Functions.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) 41, no. 4: 455–465.
Schemper, M., S. Wakounig, and G. Heinze. 2009. “The Estimation of Average Hazard Ratios by Weighted Cox Regression.” Statistics in Medicine 28, no. 19: 2473–2489.
Schoenfeld, D. 1981. “The Asymptotic Properties of Nonparametric Tests for Comparing Survival Distributions.” Biometrika 68, no. 1: 316–319.
Schoenfeld, D. A. 1983. “Sample‐Size Formula for the Proportional‐Hazards Regression Model.” Biometrics 39, no. 2: 499–503.
Thurow, M., I. Dormuth, C. Sauer, M. Ditzhaus, and M. Pauly. 2023. “How to Simulate Realistic Survival Data? A Simulation Study to Compare Realistic Simulation Models.” Preprint, submitted August 15, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv:2308.07842.
Tian, L., H. Fu, S. J. Ruberg, H. Uno, and L.‐J. Wei. 2018. “Efficiency of Two Sample Tests via the Restricted Mean Survival Time for Analyzing Event Time Observations.” Biometrics 74, no. 2: 694–702.
Tian, L., H. Jin, H. Uno, et al. 2020. “On the Empirical Choice of the Time Window for Restricted Mean Survival Time.” Biometrics 76, no. 4: 1157–1166.
Trinquart, L., J. Jacot, S. C. Conner, and R. Porcher. 2016. “Comparison of Treatment Effects Measured by the Hazard Ratio and by the Ratio of Restricted Mean Survival Times in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials.” Journal of Clinical Oncology 34, no. 15: 1813–1819.
Uno, H., B. Claggett, L. Tian, et al. 2014. “Moving Beyond the Hazard Ratio in Quantifying the Between‐Group Difference in Survival Analysis.” Journal of Clinical Oncology 32, no. 22: 2380.
Uno, H., and M. Horiguchi. 2023. “Ratio and Difference of Average Hazard With Survival Weight: New Measures to Quantify Survival Benefit of New Therapy.” Statistics in Medicine 42, no. 7: 936–952.
Uno, H., J. Wittes, H. Fu, et al. 2015. “Alternatives to Hazard Ratios for Comparing the Efficacy or Safety of Therapies in Noninferiority Studies.” Annals of Internal Medicine 163, no. 2: 127–134.
Xu, J., M. A. Psioda, and J. G. Ibrahim. 2022. “Bayesian Design of Clinical Trials Using Joint Models for Longitudinal and Time‐to‐Event Data.” Biostatistics 23, no. 2: 591–608.
Yung, G., and Y. Liu. 2019. npsurvSS: Sample Size and Power Calculation for Common Non‐Parametric Tests in Survival Analysis. R package version 1.0.1.
Yung, G., and Y. Liu. 2020. “Sample Size and Power for the Weighted Log‐Rank Test and Kaplan–Meier Based Tests With Allowance for Nonproportional Hazards.” Biometrics 76, no. 3: 939–950.

Auteurs

Ina Dormuth (I)

Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.

Markus Pauly (M)

Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Research Center Trustworthy Data Science and Security, UA Ruhr, Dortmund, Germany.

Geraldine Rauch (G)

Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Carolin Herrmann (C)

Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH