Moral resilience and intention to leave: Mediating effect of moral distress.
Ethics
intention to leave
moral distress
moral resilience
nursing
quantitative
Journal
Nursing ethics
ISSN: 1477-0989
Titre abrégé: Nurs Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9433357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Aug 2024
12 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline:
12
8
2024
pubmed:
12
8
2024
entrez:
12
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study aims to examine the mediating effect of moral distress on the relationship between moral resilience and the intention to leave. Moral distress is a phenomenon that negatively impacts healthcare workers, healthcare institutions, and recipients. To eliminate or minimize the negative effects of moral distress, it is necessary to increase the moral resilience of nurses. Moral resilience is important in protecting against the negative effects of moral distress, such as burnout and turnover intention. In this direction, it is necessary to increase the moral resilience of nurses to reduce negative situations such as turnover intention in nurses. It is a descriptive-predictive study. Sociodemographic Information Form, Measure of Moral Distress - Healthcare Professionals, and Rushton Moral Resilience Scale were used to collect data from the nurses. A total of 220 clinical nurses were recruited. Approval was obtained from the university's non-interventional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from the participants. The study found a total moral distress score of 6.39 ± 0.3.12 and moral resilience score of 2.69 ± 0.48. A moderate and weak negative correlation was found between moral distress and moral resilience. Moral distress has a moderating effect on the intention to leave nursing (β = -0.158, Moral resilience leads to decreased intention to leave, and moral distress mediates this situation. An increase in moral distress decreases moral resilience and increases intention to leave. It can be assumed that if moral distress is not controlled, increasing moral resilience will not affect the intention to leave the job.
Sections du résumé
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to examine the mediating effect of moral distress on the relationship between moral resilience and the intention to leave.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Moral distress is a phenomenon that negatively impacts healthcare workers, healthcare institutions, and recipients. To eliminate or minimize the negative effects of moral distress, it is necessary to increase the moral resilience of nurses. Moral resilience is important in protecting against the negative effects of moral distress, such as burnout and turnover intention. In this direction, it is necessary to increase the moral resilience of nurses to reduce negative situations such as turnover intention in nurses.
METHODS
METHODS
It is a descriptive-predictive study. Sociodemographic Information Form, Measure of Moral Distress - Healthcare Professionals, and Rushton Moral Resilience Scale were used to collect data from the nurses. A total of 220 clinical nurses were recruited.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
METHODS
Approval was obtained from the university's non-interventional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from the participants.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The study found a total moral distress score of 6.39 ± 0.3.12 and moral resilience score of 2.69 ± 0.48. A moderate and weak negative correlation was found between moral distress and moral resilience. Moral distress has a moderating effect on the intention to leave nursing (β = -0.158,
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Moral resilience leads to decreased intention to leave, and moral distress mediates this situation. An increase in moral distress decreases moral resilience and increases intention to leave. It can be assumed that if moral distress is not controlled, increasing moral resilience will not affect the intention to leave the job.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39133181
doi: 10.1177/09697330241272882
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9697330241272882Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning this article’s research, authorship, and/or publication.