Assessment of cancer risk associated with 7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro[1,2,4] triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine-contaminated sitagliptin use: A retrospective cohort study.

Nitrosamines Pharmacoepidemiology Sitagliptin phosphate

Journal

Journal of diabetes investigation
ISSN: 2040-1124
Titre abrégé: J Diabetes Investig
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101520702

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 31 05 2024
accepted: 19 07 2024
medline: 12 8 2024
pubmed: 12 8 2024
entrez: 12 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

A recent US Food and Drug Administration report highlighted concerns over nitrosamine (7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro[1,2,4] triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine [NTTP]) impurities in sitagliptin, prompting investigations into its safety profile. The present study aimed to determine if the use of NTTP-contaminated sitagliptin, in comparison with other dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, is associated with an increased cancer risk. This retrospective cohort study secondarily used the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan, encompassing data on >120 million individuals. The study involved patients who initiated DPP-4 inhibitor therapy (sitagliptin or other DPP-4 inhibitors) and continued its exclusive use for 3 years. Sitagliptin users were compared with other DPP-4 inhibitor users for assessing the occurrence of cancers, as defined by diagnosis codes. Further analyses focused on specific types of cancer, using either diagnosis codes or a combination of diagnosis and procedure codes. We also carried out various sensitivity analyses, including those with different exposure periods. Sitagliptin users (149,120 patients, 388,356 person-years) experienced 9,643 cancer incidences (2,483.0/100,000 person-years) versus 12,621 incidences (2,504.4/100,000 person-years) among other DPP-4 inhibitor users (199,860 patients, 503,952 person-years), yielding a minimal difference (incidence rate ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.02). A multiple Cox proportional hazards model showed no significant association between sitagliptin use and overall cancer incidence (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.04). Findings were also consistent across cancer types and sensitivity analyses. We observed no evidence to suggest an increased cancer risk among patients prescribed NTTP-contaminated sitagliptin, although continued investigation is needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39133197
doi: 10.1111/jdi.14281
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Japan Health Research Promotion Bureau
ID : 2019-(1)-3

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Références

Fang M, Wang D, Coresh J, et al. Trends in diabetes treatment and control in U.S. adults, 1999‐2018. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 2219–2228.
Bouchi R, Sugiyama T, Goto A, I Imai K, Ihana‐Sugiyama N, Ohsugi M, Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T, Ueki K Retrospective nationwide study on the trends in first‐line antidiabetic medication for patients with type 2 diabetes in Japan. J Diabetes Investig 2022;13:280–291.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA works to avoid shortage of sitagliptin following detection of nitrosamine impurity. 2022. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug‐safety‐and‐availability/fda‐works‐avoid‐shortage‐sitagliptin‐following‐detection‐nitrosamine‐impurity Accessed May 30, 2024.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Control of nitrosamine Impurities in Human Drugs–Guidance for Industry. 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/141720/download Accessed May 30, 2024.
Kato G. History of the secondary use of national database of health insurance claims and specific health checkups of Japan (NDB). Trans Jpn Soc Med Biol Eng 2017; 55: 143–150.
Ihira H, Goto A, Yamagishi K, et al. Validity of claims data for identifying cancer incidence in the Japan public health center‐based prospective study for the next generation. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2022; 31: 972–982.
Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173: 676–682.
Pollak M. The insulin and insulin‐like growth factor receptor family in neoplasia: An update. Nat Rev Cancer 2012; 12: 159–169.
Barreira da Silva R, Laird ME, Yatim N, et al. Dipeptidylpeptidase 4 inhibition enhances lymphocyte trafficking, improving both naturally occurring tumor immunity and immunotherapy. Nat Immunol 2015; 16: 850–858.
Evans JMM, Donnelly LA, Emslie‐Smith AM, et al. Metformin and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients. BMJ 2005; 330: 1304–1305.
Gandini S, Puntoni M, Heckman‐Stoddard BM, D Dunn BK, Ford L, DeCensi A, Szabo E Metformin and cancer risk and mortality: A systematic review and meta‐analysis taking into account biases and confounders. Cancer Prev Res 2014; 7: 867–885.
Wu L, Zhu J, Prokop LJ, et al. Pharmacologic therapy of diabetes and overall cancer risk and mortality: A meta‐analysis of 265 studies. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 10147.
Pradhan R, Yu OHY, Platt RW, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and the risk of skin cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes: A UK population‐based cohort study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2023; 11: e003550.
Klil‐Drori AJ, Azoulay L, Pollak MN. Cancer, obesity, diabetes, and antidiabetic drugs: Is the fog clearing? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017; 14: 85–99.
Komamine M, Kajiyama K, Ishiguro C, et al. Cardiovascular risks associated with dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors monotherapy compared with other antidiabetes drugs in the Japanese population: A nationwide cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2019; 28: 1166–1174.
Iwagami M, Kumazawa R, Miyamoto Y, et al. Risk of cancer in association with ranitidine and nizatidine vs. other h2 blockers: Analysis of the Japan medical data center claims database 2005‐2018. Drug Saf 2021; 44: 361–371.
Pottegård A, Kristensen KB, Ernst MT, et al. Use of N‐nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) contaminated valsartan products and risk of cancer: Danish nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2018; 362: k3851.
Yoon HJ, Kim JH, Seo GH, et al. Risk of cancer following the use of N‐Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) contaminated ranitidine products: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 153.
Kantor ED, O'Connell K, Du M, et al. Ranitidine use and cancer risk: Results from UK biobank. Gastroenterology 2021; 160: 1856–1859.e5.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Summary Report of Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions. 2020. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db‐hss/dl/report_gaikyo_2019.pdf Accessed May 30, 2024.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Questions and Answers: NDMA impurities in metformin products. 2020. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug‐safety‐and‐availability/questions‐and‐answers‐ndma‐impurities‐metformin‐products Accessed May 30, 2024.

Auteurs

Takehiro Sugiyama (T)

Diabetes and Metabolism Information Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Institute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Health Services Research and Development Center, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Takashi Furuno (T)

Institute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Yuichi Ichinose (Y)

Division of Health Services Research, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Public Health/Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Masao Iwagami (M)

Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Health Services Research and Development Center, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Noriko Ihana-Sugiyama (N)

Diabetes and Metabolism Information Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Kenjiro Imai (K)

Diabetes and Metabolism Information Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Tamaki Kakuwa (T)

Division of Health Services Research, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Public Health/Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Ryoko Rikitake (R)

Division of Health Services Research, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Public Health/Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Mitsuru Ohsugi (M)

Diabetes and Metabolism Information Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Takahiro Higashi (T)

Division of Health Services Research, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Public Health/Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Hiroyasu Iso (H)

Institute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Kohjiro Ueki (K)

Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Diabetes Research Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH