Comparative Safety of In Utero Exposure to Buprenorphine Combined With Naloxone vs Buprenorphine Alone.


Journal

JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 12 8 2024
pubmed: 12 8 2024
entrez: 12 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Buprenorphine combined with naloxone is commonly used to treat opioid use disorders outside of pregnancy. In pregnancy, buprenorphine alone is generally recommended because of limited perinatal safety data on the combination product. To compare perinatal outcomes following prenatal exposure to buprenorphine with naloxone vs buprenorphine alone. Population-based cohort study using health care utilization data from Medicaid-insured beneficiaries in the US from 2000 to 2018. The cohort was restricted to pregnant individuals linked to their liveborn infants, with maternal Medicaid enrollment from 3 months before pregnancy to 1 month after delivery and infant enrollment for the first 3 months after birth, unless they died sooner. Use of buprenorphine with naloxone vs buprenorphine alone during the first trimester based on outpatient dispensings. Outcomes included major congenital malformations, low birth weight, neonatal abstinence syndrome, neonatal intensive care unit admission, preterm birth, respiratory symptoms, small for gestational age, cesarean delivery, and maternal morbidity. Confounder-adjusted risk ratios were calculated using propensity score overlap weights. This study identified 3369 pregnant individuals exposed to buprenorphine with naloxone during the first trimester (mean [SD] age, 28.8 [4.6] years) and 5326 exposed to buprenorphine alone or who switched from the combination to buprenorphine alone by the end of the first trimester (mean [SD] age, 28.3 [4.5] years). When comparing buprenorphine combined with naloxone with buprenorphine alone, a lower risk for neonatal abstinence syndrome (absolute risk, 37.4% vs 55.8%; weighted relative risk, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.70-0.84]) and a modestly lower risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission (absolute risk, 30.6% vs 34.9%; weighted relative risk, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.85-0.98]) and small for gestational age (absolute risk, 10.0% vs 12.4%; weighted relative risk, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.98]) was observed. For maternal morbidity, the comparative rates were 2.6% vs 2.9%, respectively, and the weighted relative risk was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.68-1.19). No differences were observed with respect to major congenital malformations overall, low birth weight, preterm birth, respiratory symptoms, or cesarean delivery. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. There were similar and, in some instances, more favorable neonatal and maternal outcomes for pregnancies exposed to buprenorphine combined with naloxone compared with buprenorphine alone. For the outcomes assessed, compared with buprenorphine alone, buprenorphine with naloxone during pregnancy appears to be a safe treatment option. This supports the view that both formulations are reasonable options for the treatment of opioid use disorder in pregnancy, affirming flexibility in collaborative treatment decision-making.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39133511
pii: 2822178
doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.11501
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Loreen Straub (L)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Brian T Bateman (BT)

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Sonia Hernández-Díaz (S)

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Yanmin Zhu (Y)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Elizabeth A Suarez (EA)

Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, Rutgers Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey.

Seanna M Vine (SM)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Hendrée E Jones (HE)

UNC Horizons and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Hilary S Connery (HS)

Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts.
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Jonathan M Davis (JM)

Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Kathryn J Gray (KJ)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle.

Barry Lester (B)

Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.

Mishka Terplan (M)

Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.

Heidi Zakoul (H)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Helen Mogun (H)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Krista F Huybrechts (KF)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Classifications MeSH