Comparing the efficacy of faking warning types in preemployment personality tests: A meta-analysis.


Journal

The Journal of applied psychology
ISSN: 1939-1854
Titre abrégé: J Appl Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0222526

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 12 8 2024
pubmed: 12 8 2024
entrez: 12 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Numerous faking warning types have been investigated as interventions that aim to minimize applicant faking in preemployment personality tests. However, studies vary in the types and effectiveness of faking warnings used, personality traits, as well as the use of different recruitment settings and participant samples. In the present study, we advance a theory that classifies faking warning types based on ability, opportunity, and motivation to fake (Tett & Simonet, 2011), which we validated using subject matter expert ratings. Using this framework as a guide, we conducted a random-effects pairwise meta-analysis (

Identifiants

pubmed: 39133603
pii: 2025-12635-001
doi: 10.1037/apl0001224
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Benjamin Moon (B)

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary.

Kabir N Daljeet (KN)

Department of Psychology, University of Montreal.

Thomas A O'Neill (TA)

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary.

Harley Harwood (H)

Department of Psychology, Saint Mary's University.

Leonid V Beletski (LV)

Department of Psychology, Western University.

Classifications MeSH