Differentiation of Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Postacute Sequelae by Standard Clinical Laboratory Measurements in the RECOVER Cohort.
Journal
Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Aug 2024
13 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline:
12
8
2024
pubmed:
12
8
2024
entrez:
12
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
There are currently no validated clinical biomarkers of postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). To investigate clinical laboratory markers of SARS-CoV-2 and PASC. Propensity score-weighted linear regression models were fitted to evaluate differences in mean laboratory measures by prior infection and PASC index (≥12 vs. 0). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05172024). 83 enrolling sites. RECOVER-Adult cohort participants with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection with a study visit and laboratory measures 6 months after the index date (or at enrollment if >6 months after the index date). Participants were excluded if the 6-month visit occurred within 30 days of reinfection. Participants completed questionnaires and standard clinical laboratory tests. Among 10 094 participants, 8746 had prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, 1348 were uninfected, 1880 had a PASC index of 12 or higher, and 3351 had a PASC index of zero. After propensity score adjustment, participants with prior infection had a lower mean platelet count (265.9 × 10 Whether differences in laboratory markers represent consequences of or risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection could not be determined. Overall, no evidence was found that any of the 25 routine clinical laboratory values assessed in this study could serve as a clinically useful biomarker of PASC. National Institutes of Health.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
UNASSIGNED
There are currently no validated clinical biomarkers of postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC).
OBJECTIVE
UNASSIGNED
To investigate clinical laboratory markers of SARS-CoV-2 and PASC.
DESIGN
UNASSIGNED
Propensity score-weighted linear regression models were fitted to evaluate differences in mean laboratory measures by prior infection and PASC index (≥12 vs. 0). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05172024).
SETTING
UNASSIGNED
83 enrolling sites.
PARTICIPANTS
UNASSIGNED
RECOVER-Adult cohort participants with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection with a study visit and laboratory measures 6 months after the index date (or at enrollment if >6 months after the index date). Participants were excluded if the 6-month visit occurred within 30 days of reinfection.
MEASUREMENTS
UNASSIGNED
Participants completed questionnaires and standard clinical laboratory tests.
RESULTS
UNASSIGNED
Among 10 094 participants, 8746 had prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, 1348 were uninfected, 1880 had a PASC index of 12 or higher, and 3351 had a PASC index of zero. After propensity score adjustment, participants with prior infection had a lower mean platelet count (265.9 × 10
LIMITATION
UNASSIGNED
Whether differences in laboratory markers represent consequences of or risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection could not be determined.
CONCLUSION
UNASSIGNED
Overall, no evidence was found that any of the 25 routine clinical laboratory values assessed in this study could serve as a clinically useful biomarker of PASC.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
UNASSIGNED
National Institutes of Health.
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05172024']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM