Guidelines for naming and studying plasma membrane domains in plants.

Journal

Nature plants

ISSN: 2055-0278

Titre abrégé: Nat Plants

Pays: England

ID NLM: 101651677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Aug 2024

Historique:

received: 31 10 2023

accepted: 14 06 2024

medline: 13 8 2024

pubmed: 13 8 2024

entrez: 12 8 2024

Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Biological membranes play a crucial role in actively hosting, modulating and coordinating a wide range of molecular events essential for cellular function. Membranes are organized into diverse domains giving rise to dynamic molecular patchworks. However, the very definition of membrane domains has been the subject of continuous debate. For example, in the plant field, membrane domains are often referred to as nanodomains, nanoclusters, microdomains, lipid rafts, membrane rafts, signalling platforms, foci or liquid-ordered membranes without any clear rationale. In the context of plant-microbe interactions, microdomains have sometimes been used to refer to the large area at the plant-microbe interface. Some of these terms have partially overlapping meanings at best, but they are often used interchangeably in the literature. This situation generates much confusion and limits conceptual progress. There is thus an urgent need for us as a scientific community to resolve these semantic and conceptual controversies by defining an unambiguous nomenclature of membrane domains. In this Review, experts in the field get together to provide explicit definitions of plasma membrane domains in plant systems and experimental guidelines for their study. We propose that plasma membrane domains should not be considered on the basis of their size alone but rather according to the biological system being considered, such as the local membrane environment or the entire cell.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1038/s41477-024-01742-8 PMID: 39134664

pubmed: 39134664

doi: 10.1038/s41477-024-01742-8

pii: 10.1038/s41477-024-01742-8

doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

Informations de copyright

Références

Singer, S. J. & Nicolson, G. L. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science 175, 720–731 (1972).

doi: 10.1126/science.175.4023.720 pubmed: 4333397

Suzuki, K. G. N. & Kusumi, A. Refinement of Singer–Nicolson fluid-mosaic model by microscopy imaging: lipid rafts and actin-induced membrane compartmentalization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1865, 184093 (2023).

doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2022.184093 pubmed: 36423676

Nicolson, G. L. & de Mattos, G. F. The fluid–mosaic model of cell membranes: a brief introduction, historical features, some general principles, and its adaptation to current information. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2023.184135 (2023).

Nicolson, G. L. The fluid-mosaic model of membrane structure: still relevant to understanding the structure, function and dynamics of biological membranes after more than 40 years. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1838, 1451–1466 (2014).

doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.10.019

Nicolson, G. L. Update of the 1972 Singer–Nicolson fluid-mosaic model of membrane structure. Discoveries (Craiova) 1, e3 (2013).

pubmed: 32309537

Gorelova, V., Sprakel, J. & Weijers, D. Plant cell polarity as the nexus of tissue mechanics and morphogenesis. Nat. Plants https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-01021-w (2021).

Muroyama, A. & Bergmann, D. Plant cell polarity: creating diversity from inside the box. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 35, 309–336 (2019).

doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125211 pubmed: 31590583

Hutten, S. J. et al. Visualization of BRI1 and SERK3/BAK1 nanoclusters in Arabidopsis roots. PLoS ONE 12, e0169905 (2017).

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169905 pubmed: 28114413 pmcid: 5256950

Bucherl, C. A. et al. Visualization of BRI1 and BAK1(SERK3) membrane receptor heterooligomers during brassinosteroid signaling. Plant Physiol. 162, 1911–1925 (2013).

doi: 10.1104/pp.113.220152 pubmed: 23796795 pmcid: 3729770

Platre, M. P. et al. Developmental control of plant Rho GTPase nano-organization by the lipid phosphatidylserine. Science 364, 57–62 (2019).

doi: 10.1126/science.aav9959 pubmed: 30948546

Pan, X. et al. Auxin-induced signaling protein nanoclustering contributes to cell polarity formation. Nat. Commun. 11, 3914 (2020).

doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17602-w pubmed: 32764676 pmcid: 7410848

Miao, Y., Guo, X., Zhu, K. & Zhao, W. Biomolecular condensates tunes immune signaling at the host–pathogen interface. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 74, 102374 (2023).

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2023.102374 pubmed: 37148673

Jarsch, I. K. et al. Plasma membranes are subcompartmentalized into a plethora of coexisting and diverse microdomains in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell 26, 1698–1711 (2014).

doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.124446 pubmed: 24714763 pmcid: 4036580

Jaillais, Y. & Ott, T. The nanoscale organization of the plasma membrane and its importance in signaling: a proteolipid perspective. Plant Physiol. 182, 1682–1696 (2020).

doi: 10.1104/pp.19.01349 pubmed: 31857424

Malinsky, J., Opekarová, M., Grossmann, G. & Tanner, W. Membrane microdomains, rafts, and detergent-resistant membranes in plants and fungi. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 501–529 (2013).

doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120103 pubmed: 23638827

Gouguet, P. et al. Connecting the dots: from nanodomains to physiological functions of REMORINs. Plant Physiol. 85, 632–649 (2020).

Tapken, W. & Murphy, A. S. Membrane nanodomains in plants: capturing form, function, and movement. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 1573–1586 (2015).

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv054 pubmed: 25725094

Daněk, M. et al. Cell wall contributes to the stability of plasma membrane nanodomain organization of Arabidopsis thaliana FLOTILLIN2 and HYPERSENSITIVE INDUCED REACTION1 proteins. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 101, 619–636 (2019).

doi: 10.1111/tpj.14566

Bücherl, C. A. et al. Plant immune and growth receptors share common signalling components but localise to distinct plasma membrane nanodomains. eLife 6, e25114 (2017).

doi: 10.7554/eLife.25114 pubmed: 28262094 pmcid: 5383397

Malínská, K., Malínský, J., Opekarová, M. & Tanner, W. Visualization of protein compartmentation within the plasma membrane of living yeast cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 4427–4436 (2003).

doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-04-0221 pubmed: 14551254 pmcid: 266762

Wang, P. et al. The plant cytoskeleton, NET3C, and VAP27 mediate the link between the plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum. Curr. Biol. 24, 1397–1405 (2014).

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.003 pubmed: 24909329

Bayle, V. et al. Single-particle tracking photoactivated localization microscopy of membrane proteins in living plant tissues. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1600–1628 (2021).

doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-00471-4

Fratini, M. et al. Plasma membrane nano-organization specifies phosphoinositide effects on Rho-GTPases and actin dynamics in tobacco pollen tubes. Plant Cell 33, 642–670 (2021).

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaa035 pubmed: 33955493

Lv, X. et al. Membrane microdomains and the cytoskeleton constrain AtHIR1 dynamics and facilitate the formation of an AtHIR1-associated immune complex. Plant J. 90, 3–16 (2017).

doi: 10.1111/tpj.13480 pubmed: 28081290

Béziat, C. & Jaillais, Y. Should I stay or should I go: the functional importance and regulation of lipid diffusion in biological membranes. J. Exp. Bot. 74, 2479–2488 (2023).

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad032 pubmed: 36738265

Raghupathy, R. et al. Transbilayer lipid interactions mediate nanoclustering of lipid-anchored proteins. Cell 161, 581–594 (2015).

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.048 pubmed: 25910209 pmcid: 4651428

Róg, T. et al. Interdigitation of long-chain sphingomyelin induces coupling of membrane leaflets in a cholesterol dependent manner. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1858, 281–288 (2016).

doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.12.003

Grosjean, K., Mongrand, S., Beney, L., Simon-Plas, F. & Gerbeau-Pissot, P. Differential effect of plant lipids on membrane organization. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 5810–5825 (2015).

doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.598805 pubmed: 25575593 pmcid: 4342490

Noack, L. C. & Jaillais, Y. Functions of anionic lipids in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 71–102 (2020).

doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-081519-035910 pubmed: 32442391

Smokvarska, M. et al. The receptor kinase FERONIA regulates phosphatidylserine localization at the cell surface to modulate ROP signaling. Sci. Adv. 9, eadd4791 (2023).

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add4791 pubmed: 37027473 pmcid: 10081841

Simons, K. & Ikonen, E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387, 569–572 (1997).

doi: 10.1038/42408 pubmed: 9177342

Smokvarska, M. et al. A plasma membrane nanodomain ensures signal specificity during osmotic signaling in plants. Curr. Biol. 30, 4654–4664 (2020).

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.013 pubmed: 33035478

Ma, Z. et al. Membrane nanodomains modulate formin condensation for actin remodeling in Arabidopsis innate immune responses. Plant Cell 34, 374–394 (2022).

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab261 pubmed: 34726756

Liang, P. et al. Symbiotic root infections in Medicago truncatula require remorin-mediated receptor stabilization in membrane nanodomains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 40, 201721868 (2018).

Heilmann, M. & Heilmann, I. Regulators regulated: different layers of control for plasma membrane phosphoinositides in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 67, 102218 (2022).

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2022.102218 pubmed: 35504191

Fuchs, V. A. F. et al. Nanodomain-mediated lateral sorting drives polarization of the small GTPase ROP2 in the plasma membrane of root hair cells. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.10.459822 (2021).

Gronnier, J. et al. Regulation of immune receptor kinase plasma membrane nanoscale organization by a plant peptide hormone and its receptors. eLife 11, e74162 (2022).

doi: 10.7554/eLife.74162 pubmed: 34989334 pmcid: 8791635

Hurst, C. H. et al. S-acylation stabilizes ligand-induced receptor kinase complex formation during plant pattern-triggered immune signaling. Curr. Biol. 33, 1588–1596 (2023).

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.065 pubmed: 36924767

McKenna, J. F. et al. The cell wall regulates dynamics and size of plasma-membrane nanodomains in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 4, 201819077 (2019).

Tran, T. M. et al. The bacterial quorum sensing signal DSF hijacks Arabidopsis thaliana sterol biosynthesis to suppress plant innate immunity. Life Sci. Alliance 3, e202000720 (2020).

doi: 10.26508/lsa.202000720 pubmed: 32788227 pmcid: 7425213

Gronnier, J. et al. Structural basis for plant plasma membrane protein dynamics and organization into functional nanodomains. eLife 6, e26404 (2017).

doi: 10.7554/eLife.26404 pubmed: 28758890 pmcid: 5536944

Perraki, A. et al. Plasma membrane localization of Solanum tuberosum Remorin from Group 1, Homolog 3 is mediated by conformational changes in a novel C-terminal anchor and required for the restriction of potato virus X movement. Plant Physiol. 160, 624–637 (2012).

doi: 10.1104/pp.112.200519 pubmed: 22855937 pmcid: 3461544

Sun, H. et al. Xanthomonas effector XopR hijacks host actin cytoskeleton via complex coacervation. Nat. Commun. 12, 4064 (2021).

doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24375-3 pubmed: 34210966 pmcid: 8249405

Ott, T. Membrane nanodomains and microdomains in plant–microbe interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 40, 82–88 (2017).

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.08.008 pubmed: 28865975

Martin, S. W., Glover, B. J. & Davies, J. M. Lipid microdomains—plant membranes get organized. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 263–265 (2005).

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.04.004 pubmed: 15949758

Zappel, N. F. & Panstruga, R. Heterogeneity and lateral compartmentalization of plant plasma membranes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11, 632–640 (2008).

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.07.002 pubmed: 18774330

Yu, M., Cui, Y., Zhang, X., Li, R. & Lin, J. Organization and dynamics of functional plant membrane microdomains. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 77, 275–287 (2020).

doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03270-7 pubmed: 31422442

Nakamura, M. & Grebe, M. Outer, inner and planar polarity in the Arabidopsis root. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 41, 46–53 (2017).

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.08.002 pubmed: 28869926

Łangowski et al. Cellular mechanisms for cargo delivery and polarity maintenance at different polar domains in plant cells. Cell Discov. 2, 16018 (2016).

doi: 10.1038/celldisc.2016.18 pubmed: 27462465 pmcid: 4950145

Langowski, L., Růzicka, K., Naramoto, S., Kleine-Vehn, J. & Friml, J. Trafficking to the outer polar domain defines the root–soil interface. Curr. Biol. 20, 904–908 (2010).

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.059 pubmed: 20451385

Kleine-Vehn, J. et al. Recycling, clustering, and endocytosis jointly maintain PIN auxin carrier polarity at the plasma membrane. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 540 (2011).

doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.72 pubmed: 22027551 pmcid: 3261718

Barberon, M. et al. Polarization of IRON-REGULATED TRANSPORTER 1 (IRT1) to the plant–soil interface plays crucial role in metal homeostasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8293–8298 (2014).

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402262111 pubmed: 24843126 pmcid: 4050562

Rodriguez-Furlan, C., Emami, A. & Van Norman, J. M. Distinct ADP–ribosylation factor–GTP exchange factors govern the opposite polarity of 2 receptor kinases. Plant Physiol. 194, 673–683 (2024).

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad519 pubmed: 37787604

Denninger, P. et al. Distinct RopGEFs successively drive polarization and outgrowth of root hairs. Curr. Biol. 29, 1854–1865 (2019).

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.059 pubmed: 31104938

Elliott, L. & Kirchhelle, C. The importance of being edgy: cell geometric edges as an emerging polar domain in plant cells. J. Microsc. 278, 123–131 (2020).

doi: 10.1111/jmi.12847 pubmed: 31755561

Lace, B. et al. RPG acts as a central determinant for infectosome formation and cellular polarization during intracellular rhizobial infections. eLife 12, e80741 (2023).

doi: 10.7554/eLife.80741 pubmed: 36856086 pmcid: 9991063

Scholz, P., Anstatt, J., Krawczyk, H. E. & Ischebeck, T. Signalling pinpointed to the tip: the complex regulatory network that allows pollen tube growth. Plants 9, 1098 (2020).

doi: 10.3390/plants9091098 pubmed: 32859043 pmcid: 7569787

Müller, S. Update: on selected ROP cell polarity mechanisms in plant cell morphogenesis. Plant Physiol. 193, 26–41 (2023).

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad229 pubmed: 37070572

Oda, Y. & Fukuda, H. Initiation of cell wall pattern by a Rho- and microtubule-driven symmetry breaking. Science 337, 1333–1336 (2012).

doi: 10.1126/science.1222597 pubmed: 22984069

Smokvarska, M., Jaillais, Y. & Martinière, A. Function of membrane domains in Rho-of-Plant signaling. Plant Physiol. 185, 663–681 (2021).

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiaa082 pubmed: 33793925 pmcid: 8133555

Lin, W. & Yang, Z. Unlocking the mechanisms behind the formation of interlocking pavement cells. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 57, 142–154 (2020).

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.09.002 pubmed: 33128897

Kost, B. et al. Rac homologues and compartmentalized phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate act in a common pathway to regulate polar pollen tube growth. J. Cell Biol. 145, 317–330 (1999).

doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.2.317 pubmed: 10209027 pmcid: 2133117

Noack, L. C. & Jaillais, Y. Precision targeting by phosphoinositides: how PIs direct endomembrane trafficking in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 40, 22–33 (2017).

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.06.017 pubmed: 28734137

Sternberg, H. et al. Formation of self-organizing functionally distinct Rho of plants domains involves a reduced mobile population. Plant Physiol. 187, 2485–2508 (2021).

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab385 pubmed: 34618086 pmcid: 8644358

Bozkurt, T. O. et al. The plant membrane-associated REMORIN1.3 accumulates in discrete perihaustorial domains and enhances susceptibility to Phytophthora infestans. Plant Physiol. 165, 1005–1018 (2014).

doi: 10.1104/pp.114.235804 pubmed: 24808104 pmcid: 4081318

Qin, L. et al. Specific recruitment of phosphoinositide species to the plant–pathogen interfacial membrane underlies Arabidopsis susceptibility to fungal infection. Plant Cell 32, 1665–1688 (2020).

doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00970 pubmed: 32156686 pmcid: 7203932

Kolbeck, A. et al. CASP microdomain formation requires cross cell wall stabilization of domains and non-cell autonomous action of LOTR1. eLife 11, e69602 (2022).

doi: 10.7554/eLife.69602 pubmed: 35029147 pmcid: 8794472

Barbosa, I. C. R. et al. Directed growth and fusion of membrane-wall microdomains requires CASP-mediated inhibition and displacement of secretory foci. Nat. Commun. 14, 1626 (2023).

doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37265-7 pubmed: 36959183 pmcid: 10036488

Yoshida, S. et al. A SOSEKI-based coordinate system interprets global polarity cues in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 5, 160–166 (2019).

doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0363-6 pubmed: 30737509 pmcid: 6420093

van Dop, M. et al. DIX domain polymerization drives assembly of plant cell polarity complexes. Cell 180, 427–439 (2020).

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.011 pubmed: 32004461 pmcid: 7042713

Ramalho, J. J., Jones, V. A. S., Mutte, S. & Weijers, D. Pole position: how plant cells polarize along the axes. Plant Cell 34, 174–192 (2022).

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab203 pubmed: 34338785

Lee, Y., Rubio, M. C., Alassimone, J. & Geldner, N. A mechanism for localized lignin deposition in the endodermis. Cell 153, 402–412 (2013).

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.045 pubmed: 23541512

Hosmani, P. S. et al. Dirigent domain-containing protein is part of the machinery required for formation of the lignin-based Casparian strip in the root. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14498–14503 (2013).

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308412110 pubmed: 23940370 pmcid: 3761638

Pan, X., Pérez-Henríquez, P., Van Norman, J. M. & Yang, Z. Membrane nanodomains: dynamic nanobuilding blocks of polarized cell growth. Plant Physiol. 93, 83–97 (2023).

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad288

Sugiyama, Y., Wakazaki, M., Toyooka, K., Fukuda, H. & Oda, Y. A novel plasma membrane-anchored protein regulates xylem cell-wall deposition through microtubule-dependent lateral inhibition of Rho GTPase domains. Curr. Biol. 27, 2522–2528 (2017).

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.059 pubmed: 28803875

Alassimone, J., Naseer, S. & Geldner, N. A developmental framework for endodermal differentiation and polarity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5214–5219 (2010).

doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910772107 pubmed: 20142472 pmcid: 2841941

Aliaga Fandino, A. C., Jelínková, A., Marhava, P., Petrášek, J. & Hardtke, C. S. Ectopic assembly of an auxin efflux control machinery shifts developmental trajectories. Plant Cell 36, 1791–1805 (2024).

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koae023 pubmed: 38267818

Bloch, D. et al. Exocyst SEC3 and phosphoinositides define sites of exocytosis in pollen tube initiation and growth. Plant Physiol. 172, 980–1002 (2016).

pubmed: 27516531 pmcid: 5047084

Vukašinović, N. et al. Microtubule-dependent targeting of the exocyst complex is necessary for xylem development in Arabidopsis. N. Phytol. 213, 1052–1067 (2016).

doi: 10.1111/nph.14267

Kusumaatmaja, H. et al. Wetting of phase-separated droplets on plant vacuole membranes leads to a competition between tonoplast budding and nanotube formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2024109118 (2021).

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024109118 pubmed: 34475202 pmcid: 8433588

Dragwidge, J. M. et al. Biomolecular condensation orchestrates clathrin-mediated endocytosis in plants. Nat. Cell Biol. 26, 438–449 (2024).

doi: 10.1038/s41556-024-01354-6 pubmed: 38347182

Liu, C. et al. SEC14-like condensate phase transitions at plasma membranes regulate root growth in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002305 (2023).

doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002305 pubmed: 37721949 pmcid: 10538751

Noack, L. C. et al. A nanodomain-anchored scaffolding complex is required for the function and localization of phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alpha in plants. Plant Cell 34, 302–332 (2022).

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab135 pubmed: 34010411

Gomez, R. E. et al. Phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate controls autophagosome formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 13, 4385 (2022).

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32109-2 pubmed: 35902598 pmcid: 9334301

Chambaud, C., Cookson, S. J., Ollat, N., Bayer, E. & Brocard, L. A correlative light electron microscopy approach reveals plasmodesmata ultrastructure at the graft interface. Plant Physiol. 188, 44–55 (2021).

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab485 pmcid: 8774839

Li, Z. P. et al. Plant plasmodesmata bridges form through ER-driven incomplete cytokinesis. Science adn4630 https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.12.571296 (2024 in press).

Watanabe, S. et al. Protein localization in electron micrographs using fluorescence nanoscopy. Nat. Methods 8, 80–84 (2011).

doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1537 pubmed: 21102453

Fu, Z. et al. mEosEM withstands osmium staining and Epon embedding for super-resolution CLEM. Nat. Methods 17, 55–58 (2020).

doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0613-6 pubmed: 31611693

Brown, D. A. & Rose, J. K. Sorting of GPI-anchored proteins to glycolipid-enriched membrane subdomains during transport to the apical cell surface. Cell 68, 533–544 (1992).

doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90189-J pubmed: 1531449

Renne, M. F. & Ernst, R. Membrane homeostasis beyond fluidity: control of membrane compressibility. Trends Biochem. Sci. 48, 963–977 (2023).

doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2023.08.004 pubmed: 37652754 pmcid: 10580326

Marsh, D. Handbook of Lipid Bilayers (CRC, 2013).

Mair, A., Xu, S.-L., Branon, T. C., Ting, A. Y. & Bergmann, D. C. Proximity labeling of protein complexes and cell-type-specific organellar proteomes in Arabidopsis enabled by TurboID. eLife 8, e47864 (2019).

doi: 10.7554/eLife.47864 pubmed: 31535972 pmcid: 6791687

Arora, D. et al. Establishment of proximity-dependent biotinylation approaches in different plant model systems. Plant Cell 32, 3388–3407 (2020).

doi: 10.1105/tpc.20.00235 pubmed: 32843435 pmcid: 7610282

Wallner, E.-S. et al. Spatially resolved proteomics of the Arabidopsis stomatal lineage identifies polarity complexes for cell divisions and stomatal pores. Dev. Cell 59, 1096–1109 (2024).

doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2024.03.001 pubmed: 38518768

Liu, C. et al. An actin remodeling role for Arabidopsis processing bodies revealed by their proximity interactome. EMBO J. 42, e111885 (2023).

doi: 10.15252/embj.2022111885 pubmed: 36741000 pmcid: 10152145

Laganowsky, A. et al. Membrane proteins bind lipids selectively to modulate their structure and function. Nature 510, 172–175 (2014).

doi: 10.1038/nature13419 pubmed: 24899312 pmcid: 4087533

Laganowsky, A., Reading, E., Hopper, J. T. S. & Robinson, C. V. Mass spectrometry of intact membrane protein complexes. Nat. Protoc. 8, 639–651 (2013).

doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.024 pubmed: 23471109 pmcid: 4058633

Liu, P. et al. Mechanism of sphingolipid homeostasis revealed by structural analysis of Arabidopsis SPT–ORM1 complex. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg0728 (2023).

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg0728 pubmed: 36989369 pmcid: 10058238

Sarewicz, M. et al. High-resolution cryo-EM structures of plant cytochrome b

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add9688 pubmed: 36638176 pmcid: 9839326

Mandala, V. S., Loftis, A. R., Shcherbakov, A. A., Pentelute, B. L. & Hong, M. Atomic structures of closed and open influenza B M2 proton channel reveal the conduction mechanism. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 160–167 (2020).

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0371-2 pubmed: 32015551 pmcid: 7641042

Xie, H. et al. Solid-state NMR structure determination of a membrane protein in E. coli cellular inner membrane. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh4168 (2023).

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh4168 pubmed: 37910616 pmcid: 10619923

Marrink, S. J. et al. Computational modeling of realistic cell membranes. Chem. Rev. 119, 6184–6226 (2019).

doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00460 pubmed: 30623647 pmcid: 6509646

Lee, E. H., Hsin, J., Sotomayor, M., Comellas, G. & Schulten, K. Discovery through the computational microscope. Structure 17, 1295–1306 (2009).

doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.09.001 pubmed: 19836330 pmcid: 2927212

Sych, T., Levental, K. R. & Sezgin, E. Lipid–protein interactions in plasma membrane organization and function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 51, 135–156 (2022).

doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-090721-072718 pubmed: 34982570

Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 pubmed: 34265844 pmcid: 8371605

König, S., Mosblech, A. & Heilmann, I. Stress-inducible and constitutive phosphoinositide pools have distinctive fatty acid patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana. FASEB J. 21, 1958–1967 (2007).

doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7887com pubmed: 17327357

Boutté, Y. & Jaillais, Y. Metabolic cellular communications: feedback mechanisms between membrane lipid homeostasis and plant development. Dev. Cell 54, 171–182 (2020).

doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.05.005 pubmed: 32502395

Cassim, A. M. et al. Plant lipids: key players of plasma membrane organization and function. Prog. Lipid Res. 73, 1–27 (2019).

doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2018.11.002

Colin, L. A. & Jaillais, Y. Phospholipids across scales: lipid patterns and plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 53, 1–9 (2019).

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.08.007 pubmed: 31580918

Martinière, A. et al. Cell wall constrains lateral diffusion of plant plasma-membrane proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12805–12810 (2012).

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202040109 pubmed: 22689944 pmcid: 3411962

Liu, Z., Persson, S. & Sanchez-Rodriguez, C. At the border: the plasma membrane–cell wall continuum. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 1553–1563 (2015).

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv019 pubmed: 25697794

Kirchhelle, C. & Hamant, O. Discretizing the cellular bases of plant morphogenesis: emerging properties from subcellular and noisy patterning. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 81, 102159 (2023).

doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2023.102159 pubmed: 36966612

Elliott, L. et al. A self-regulatory cell-wall-sensing module at cell edges controls plant growth. Nat. Plants 10, 483–493 (2024).

doi: 10.1038/s41477-024-01629-8 pubmed: 38454063 pmcid: 10954545

Wallner, E.-S., Dolan, L. & Bergmann, D. C. Arabidopsis stomatal lineage cells establish bipolarity and segregate differential signaling capacity to regulate stem cell potential. Dev. Cell 58, 1643–1656 (2023).

doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.07.024 pubmed: 37607546

Minami, A. et al. Arabidopsis dynamin-related protein 1E in sphingolipid-enriched plasma membrane domains is associated with the development of freezing tolerance. Plant J. 83, 501–514 (2015).

doi: 10.1111/tpj.12907 pubmed: 26095877

Laine, R. F. et al. High-fidelity 3D live-cell nanoscopy through data-driven enhanced super-resolution radial fluctuation. Nat. Methods 20, 1949–1956 (2023).

doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-02057-w pubmed: 37957430 pmcid: 10703683

Levet, F. et al. A tessellation-based colocalization analysis approach for single-molecule localization microscopy. Nat. Commun. 10, 2379 (2019).

doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10007-4 pubmed: 31147535 pmcid: 6542817

Wallis, T. P. et al. Super-resolved trajectory-derived nanoclustering analysis using spatiotemporal indexing. Nat. Commun. 14, 3353 (2023).

doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38866-y pubmed: 37291117 pmcid: 10250379