Exploring Mianzi consciousness congruence and its impact on unethical pro-organizational behavior.
External work locus of control
Mianzi management strategy
Response surface analysis
Unethical pro-organizational behavior
Journal
BMC psychology
ISSN: 2050-7283
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101627676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Aug 2024
12 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
18
04
2024
accepted:
31
07
2024
medline:
13
8
2024
pubmed:
13
8
2024
entrez:
12
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In Chinese culture, the concept of Mianzi holds significant importance in interpersonal interactions. Mianzi represents one's social standing, dignity, and reputation, influencing behaviors and decisions within various contexts. Mianzi consciousness manifests in two primary forms: proactive and defensive. Proactive Mianzi consciousness involves efforts to enhance one's social image, while defensive Mianzi consciousness focuses on protecting one's existing reputation. Analyzing the impact of the two Mianzi consciousness dimensions on individuals' attitudes and behaviors is effective for understanding interpersonal dynamics in China. This study specifically examined the relationship between high Mianzi consciousness congruence and unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). UPB refers to actions taken by employees that are intended to benefit their organization but are unethical or morally questionable. By investigating how congruence in proactive and defensive Mianzi consciousness influences the likelihood of engaging in UPB, this research aimed to uncover the underlying social and psychological mechanisms driving such behavior. Employing polynomial regression and response surface analysis method, this study developed a model that combines the proactive Mianzi consciousness and the defensive Mianzi consciousness into different Mianzi management strategies and tested the relationship between high Mianzi consciousness congruence and UPB. Sample data collected at two time points one month apart supported all hypotheses. Specifically, the findings revealed that high levels of Mianzi consciousness congruence (i.e., all-around type in Mianzi management strategies) positively relate to UPB, and verified the mediation effect of external work locus of control and the moderation effect of relational psychological contract. This research advanced a novel, synergistic perspective on the role of social Mianzi and contributed to the localized UPB research, thus helping to find a path to prevent UPB from occurring in the Chinese sociocultural context.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In Chinese culture, the concept of Mianzi holds significant importance in interpersonal interactions. Mianzi represents one's social standing, dignity, and reputation, influencing behaviors and decisions within various contexts. Mianzi consciousness manifests in two primary forms: proactive and defensive. Proactive Mianzi consciousness involves efforts to enhance one's social image, while defensive Mianzi consciousness focuses on protecting one's existing reputation. Analyzing the impact of the two Mianzi consciousness dimensions on individuals' attitudes and behaviors is effective for understanding interpersonal dynamics in China. This study specifically examined the relationship between high Mianzi consciousness congruence and unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). UPB refers to actions taken by employees that are intended to benefit their organization but are unethical or morally questionable. By investigating how congruence in proactive and defensive Mianzi consciousness influences the likelihood of engaging in UPB, this research aimed to uncover the underlying social and psychological mechanisms driving such behavior.
METHODS
METHODS
Employing polynomial regression and response surface analysis method, this study developed a model that combines the proactive Mianzi consciousness and the defensive Mianzi consciousness into different Mianzi management strategies and tested the relationship between high Mianzi consciousness congruence and UPB.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Sample data collected at two time points one month apart supported all hypotheses. Specifically, the findings revealed that high levels of Mianzi consciousness congruence (i.e., all-around type in Mianzi management strategies) positively relate to UPB, and verified the mediation effect of external work locus of control and the moderation effect of relational psychological contract.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This research advanced a novel, synergistic perspective on the role of social Mianzi and contributed to the localized UPB research, thus helping to find a path to prevent UPB from occurring in the Chinese sociocultural context.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39135140
doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01934-z
pii: 10.1186/s40359-024-01934-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
436Subventions
Organisme : the National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 72071124
Organisme : the National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 72071124
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Lin Y. My country and my people. New York, NY, United States: John Day; 1935.
Bao Y, Zhou KZ, Su C. Face consciousness and risk aversion: do they affect consumer decision-making? Psychol Market. 2003;20(8):733–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10094 .
doi: 10.1002/mar.10094
Zhao H, Zhang H, Xu Y. How social face consciousness influences corrupt intention: examining the effects of Honesty–Humility and moral disengagement. J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(4):443–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1507992 .
doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1507992
pubmed: 30142290
Zong B, Xu S, Zhang L, Qu J. Dealing with negative workplace gossip: from the perspective of face. Front Psychol. 2021;12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629376 .
Ho YF. On the concept of face. Am J Sociol. 1976;81(4):867–84. https://doi.org/10.1086/226145 .
doi: 10.1086/226145
Zhang XA, Cao Q, Grigoriou N. Consciousness of social face: the development and validation of a scale measuring desire to gain face versus fear of losing face. J Soc Psychol. 2011;151(2):129–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366669 .
doi: 10.1080/00224540903366669
pubmed: 21476458
Tang M, Li F, Miesing P, Mei M, Xu P. Risk or return? The effect of face consciousness influences on the career construction of Chinese rural dwellers in urban areas. Front Psychol. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870655 .
Wang W, Zhang X-a, Li J, Sun G. Approach or avoidance? The dual role of face in fashion consumption. J Glob Mark. 2020;33(2):103–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2019.1654055 .
doi: 10.1080/08911762.2019.1654055
Elliot AJ. The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motiv Emot. 2006;30(2):111–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7
Umphress EE, Bingham JB, Mitchell MS. Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95(4):769–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019214 .
doi: 10.1037/a0019214
pubmed: 20604596
Zhang S, Zhou B. Impact of Mianzi consciousness on unethical pro-organizational behavior: the roles of impression management motive, educational level, party affiliation in China. Curr Psychol. 2024;43(16):14244–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05432-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-05432-0
Spector PE. Development of the work locus of control scale. J Occup Psychol. 1988;61(4):335–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00470.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00470.x
O’Neill BS, Adya M. Knowledge sharing and the psychological contract. J Manage Psychol. 2007;22(4):411–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710745969 .
doi: 10.1108/02683940710745969
Suazo MM. The mediating role of psychological contract violation on the relations between psychological contract breach and work-related attitudes and behaviors. J Manage Psychol. 2009;24(2):136–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910928856 .
doi: 10.1108/02683940910928856
Zhao H, Bai R, Liu R, Wang H. Exploring purchase intentions of new energy vehicles: do mianzi and green peer influence matter? Front Psychol. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951132 .
Chen S, Shao B, Zhi K. Predictors of Chinese users’ location disclosure behavior: an empirical study on wechat. Information. 2018;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9090219 .
Ekeh PP. Social Exchange Theory: the two traditions. Cambridge, MA, United States: Harvard University Press; 1974.
Roloff ME. Interpersonal communication: the Social Exchange Approach. Beverly Hills, CA, United States: Sage; 1981.
Bandura A, Walters RH. Social Learning and Personality Development. New York, NY, United States: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1963.
Kormanik MB, Rocco TS. Internal versus external control of reinforcement: a review of the locus of control construct. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2009;8(4):463–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309342080 .
doi: 10.1177/1534484309342080
Byza OAU, Schuh SC, Dörr SL, Spörrle M, Maier GW. Are two cynics better than one? Toward understanding effects of leader–follower (in-)congruence in social cynicism. J Organ Behav. 2017;38(8):1246–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2200 .
doi: 10.1002/job.2200
Goswami A, Park HI, Beehr TA. Does the congruence between leaders’ implicit followership theories and their perceptions of actual followers matter? J Bus Psychol. 2020;35(4):519–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09638-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s10869-019-09638-7
Wong SI, Škerlavaj M, Černe M. Build coalitions to fit: autonomy expectations, competence mobilization, and job crafting. Hum Resour Manage-US. 2017;56(5):785–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21805 .
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21805
Effelsberg D, Solga M, Gurt J. Transformational leadership and follower’s unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: a two-study investigation. J Bus Ethics. 2014;120(1):81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1644-z .
doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1644-z
Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr Gen Appl. 1966;80(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976 .
doi: 10.1037/h0092976
Rotter JB. Social Learning and clinical psychology. Englewood cliffs, NJ. United States: Prentice Hall; 1954. https://doi.org/10.1037/10788-000 .
doi: 10.1037/10788-000
Brickson S. The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically diverse settings. Acad Manage Rev. 2000;25(1):82–101. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791604 .
doi: 10.5465/amr.2000.2791604
Spector PE. Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychol Bull. 1982;91(3):482–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.482 .
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.482
Siswanto S, Darus U. The moderating role of work discipline on the links between locus of control and work ethics in local government employees. Manag Econ J. 2020;4(2):117–34. https://doi.org/10.18860/mec-j.v4i2.9914 .
doi: 10.18860/mec-j.v4i2.9914
Kerssen-Griep J, Trees AR, Hess JA. Attentive facework during instructional feedback: key to perceiving mentorship and an optimal learning environment. Commun Educ. 2008;57(3):312–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520802027347 .
doi: 10.1080/03634520802027347
Qureshi AR, Raza B, Ahmed A. Impact of work regulatory focus and work locus of control on unethical pro-organizational behaviors in pharmaceuticals: mediating role of reflective moral attentiveness. RADS J Bus Manag. 2022;4(1):76–89.
Tang C, Chen Y, Wei W. External work locus of control and unethical pro-organizational behavior: A dual-path model. In: Academy of Management Annual Meeting: 29 July 2020; virtually. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.13294abstract
Graham KA, Resick CJ, Margolis JA, Shao P, Hargis MB, Kiker JD. Egoistic norms, organizational identification, and the perceived ethicality of unethical pro-organizational behavior: a moral maturation perspective. Hum Relat. 2019;73(9):1249–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719862851 .
doi: 10.1177/0018726719862851
Chen M, Chen CC, Schminke M. Feeling guilty and entitled: paradoxical consequences of unethical pro-organizational behavior. J Bus Ethics. 2023;183(3):865–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05109-x .
doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05109-x
Lee A, Schwarz G, Newman A, Legood A. Investigating when and why psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizational behavior. J Bus Ethics. 2019;154(1):109–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z .
doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z
Rousseau DM. Psychological contracts in Organizations: understanding Written and Unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA, United States: Sage; 1995.
doi: 10.4135/9781452231594
Cullinane N, Dundon T. The psychological contract: a critical review. Int J Manag Rev. 2006;8(2):113–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00123.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00123.x
Aggarwal U, Bhargava S. Predictors and outcomes of relational and transactional psychological contract. Psychol Stud. 2010;55(3):195–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-010-0033-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s12646-010-0033-2
Cavanaugh MA, Noe RA. Antecedents and consequences of relational components of the new psychological contract. J Organ Behav. 1999;20(3):323–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199905)20:3%3C323::AID-JOB901%3E3.0.CO;2-M .
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199905)20:3<323::AID-JOB901>3.0.CO;2-M
Kock F, Berbekova A, Assaf AG. Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: detection, prevention and control. Tourism Manage. 2021;86:104330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330 .
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330
Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1(3):185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301 .
doi: 10.1177/135910457000100301
Liao Z, Chen J, Jia L, Chen X, Ding H. Does social crowding promote green products purchasing? Analyzing the role of face consciousness and relative price. Comput Ind Eng. 2023;184:109575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109575 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109575
Cheng B, Lin H, Kong Y. Challenge or hindrance? How and when organizational artificial intelligence adoption influences employee job crafting. J Bus Res. 2023;164:113987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113987 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113987
Zhang S. Workplace spirituality and unethical pro-organizational behavior: the mediating effect of job satisfaction. J Bus Ethics. 2020;161(3):687–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3966-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3966-3
Coyle-Shapiro J, Kessler I. Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: a large scale survey. J Manage Stud. 2000;37(7):903–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00210 .
doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00210
Hui C, Lee C, Rousseau DM. Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: investigating generalizability and instrumentality. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(2):311–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.311 .
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.311
pubmed: 15065977
Wang G. Research on the relationship of knowledge employees’ psychological contract perception and innovation behavior. Phd thesis. Wuhan University, Economics and Management School; 2011.
Edwards JR. Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In: Measuring and Analyzing Behavior in Organizations: Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis. Edited by Drasgow F, Schmitt N. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass/Wiley; 2002: 350–400.
Edwards JR, Cable DM. The value of value congruence. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(3):654–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014891 .
doi: 10.1037/a0014891
pubmed: 19450005
Hair JRJF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, United States: Prentice Hall; 2009.
Shanock LR, Baran BE, Gentry WA, Pattison SC, Heggestad ED. Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: a powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. J Bus Psychol. 2010;25(4):543–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York, NY, United States: Routledge; 2010.