Reviewing Ethical Guidelines for the Care of Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders after 30 Years: Rethinking Our Approach at a Time of Transition.
Journal
Anesthesiology
ISSN: 1528-1175
Titre abrégé: Anesthesiology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1300217
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2024
01 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline:
13
8
2024
pubmed:
13
8
2024
entrez:
13
8
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) opposes automatic reversal of do-not-resuscitate orders during the perioperative period, instead advocating for a goal-directed approach that aligns decision-making with patients' priorities and clinical circumstances. Implementation of ASA guidelines continues to face significant barriers including time constraints, lack of longitudinal relationships with patients, and difficulty translating goal-focused discussion into concrete clinical plans. These challenges mirror those of advance care planning more generally, suggesting a need for novel frameworks for serious illness communication and patient-centered decision-making. This review considers ASA guidelines in the context of ongoing transitions to serious illness communication and increasingly multidisciplinary perioperative care. It aims to provide practical guidance for the practicing anesthesiologist while also acknowledging the complexity of decision-making, considering limitations inherent to anesthesiologists' role, and outlining a need to conceptualize delivery of ethically informed care as a collaborative, multidisciplinary endeavor.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39136474
pii: 141840
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005107
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
584-597Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 American Society of Anesthesiologists. All Rights Reserved.