Extraction of lumen less pacing leads from the His Bundle and left bundle branch area - outcomes of the high volume center.

His bundle pacing conduction system pacing lead extraction left bundle branch area pacing

Journal

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 22 04 2024
received: 04 06 2024
accepted: 12 08 2024
medline: 13 8 2024
pubmed: 13 8 2024
entrez: 13 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The application of conduction system pacing (CSP) in clinical practice is growing, and the need for lead extraction will also increase. The data on outcomes and safety of CSP lead extraction are limited. The aim of this study was to assess procedural outcomes and safety of CSP lead removal. Forty-seven patients from the EXTRACT Registry with the indication for CSP lead removal were enrolled in the study conducted at the Department of Electrocardiology in Katowice, Poland. Extraction technique, outcomes, safety, and complication were evaluated. Forty-three (91.5%) leads were successfully removed, and 41 (87.2%) were removed with traction only. The dwelling time of 28 extracted leads was longer than one year, and the oldest extracted lead was implanted for 89 months. Seven (14.9%) leads were removed from the left bundle branch area and 36 from the His bundle. Transient complete AV block occurred during the procedure in two patients. In 27 out of 31 attempts (87.1%), new CSP leads were implanted: nine (33.3%) His bundle pacing leads and 18 (66.7%) left bundle branch area pacing leads. The CSP lead extraction is safe and feasible with a low complication rate and high rate of CSP lead reimplantation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
The application of conduction system pacing (CSP) in clinical practice is growing, and the need for lead extraction will also increase. The data on outcomes and safety of CSP lead extraction are limited. The aim of this study was to assess procedural outcomes and safety of CSP lead removal.
METHODS METHODS
Forty-seven patients from the EXTRACT Registry with the indication for CSP lead removal were enrolled in the study conducted at the Department of Electrocardiology in Katowice, Poland. Extraction technique, outcomes, safety, and complication were evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty-three (91.5%) leads were successfully removed, and 41 (87.2%) were removed with traction only. The dwelling time of 28 extracted leads was longer than one year, and the oldest extracted lead was implanted for 89 months. Seven (14.9%) leads were removed from the left bundle branch area and 36 from the His bundle. Transient complete AV block occurred during the procedure in two patients. In 27 out of 31 attempts (87.1%), new CSP leads were implanted: nine (33.3%) His bundle pacing leads and 18 (66.7%) left bundle branch area pacing leads.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The CSP lead extraction is safe and feasible with a low complication rate and high rate of CSP lead reimplantation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39137240
pii: 7732937
doi: 10.1093/europace/euae213
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Auteurs

Rafal Gardas (R)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University in Katowice.

Danuta Loboda (D)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University in Katowice.

Jolanta Biernat (J)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Tomasz Soral (T)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Piotr Kulesza (P)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Sylwia Gładysz-Wańha (S)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Michał Joniec (M)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Mateusz Sajdok (M)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Kamil Zub (K)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Krzysztof S Golba (KS)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University in Katowice.

Classifications MeSH