The right posterior parietal cortex mediates spatial reorienting of attentional choice bias.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Aug 2024
13 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
20
09
2022
accepted:
02
08
2024
medline:
14
8
2024
pubmed:
14
8
2024
entrez:
13
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Attention facilitates behavior by enhancing perceptual sensitivity (sensory processing) and choice bias (decisional weighting) for attended information. Whether distinct neural substrates mediate these distinct components of attention remains unknown. We investigate the causal role of key nodes of the right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC) in the forebrain attention network in sensitivity versus bias control. Two groups of participants performed a cued attention task while we applied either inhibitory, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (n = 28) or 40 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (n = 26) to the dorsal rPPC. We show that rPPC stimulation - with either modality - impairs task performance by selectively altering attentional modulation of bias but not sensitivity. Specifically, participants' bias toward the uncued, but not the cued, location reduced significantly following rPPC stimulation - an effect that was consistent across both neurostimulation cohorts. In sum, the dorsal rPPC causally mediates the reorienting of choice bias, one particular component of visual spatial attention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39138185
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51283-z
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-51283-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6938Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G. L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 201–215 (2002).
pubmed: 11994752
doi: 10.1038/nrn755
Carrasco, M. Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vis. Res. 51, 1484–1525 (2011).
pubmed: 21549742
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012
Rahnev, D. et al. Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1513–1515 (2011).
pubmed: 22019729
doi: 10.1038/nn.2948
Luo, T. Z. & Maunsell, J. H. R. Neuronal Modulations in Visual Cortex Are Associated with Only One of Multiple Components of Attention. Neuron 86, 1182–1188 (2015).
pubmed: 26050038
pmcid: 4458699
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.007
Banerjee, S., Grover, S., Ganesh, S. & Sridharan, D. Sensory and decisional components of endogenous attention are dissociable. J. Neurophysiol. 122, 1538–1554 (2019).
pubmed: 31268805
pmcid: 6843089
doi: 10.1152/jn.00257.2019
Sreenivasan, V. & Sridharan, D. Subcortical connectivity correlates selectively with attention’s effects on spatial choice bias. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 19711–19716 (2019).
pubmed: 31492811
pmcid: 6765279
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902704116
Kincade, J. M., Abrams, R. A., Astafiev, S. V., Shulman, G. L. & Corbetta, M. An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention. J. Neurosci. 25, 4593–4604 (2005).
pubmed: 15872107
pmcid: 6725019
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0236-05.2005
Mesulam, M. M. Spatial attention and neglect: Parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 354, 1325–1346 (1999).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0482
Culham, J. C. & Kanwisher, N. G. Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 157–163 (2001).
pubmed: 11301234
doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00191-4
Freedman, D. J. & Ibos, G. An Integrative Framework for Sensory, Motor, and Cognitive Functions of the Posterior Parietal Cortex. Neuron 97, 1219–1234 (2018).
pubmed: 29566792
pmcid: 5884170
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.044
Bisley, J. W. & Goldberg, M. E. Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 1–21 (2010).
pubmed: 20192813
pmcid: 3683564
doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152823
Bressler, S. L., Tang, W., Sylvester, C. M., Shulman, G. L. & Corbetta, M. Top-Down Control of Human Visual Cortex by Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Anticipatory Visual Spatial Attention. J. Neurosci. 28, 10056–10061 (2008).
pubmed: 18829963
pmcid: 2583122
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1776-08.2008
Duecker, F. & Sack, A. T. The hybrid model of attentional control: New insights into hemispheric asymmetries inferred from TMS research. Neuropsychologia 74, 21–29 (2015).
pubmed: 25451041
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.023
Hilgetag, C. C., Théoret, H. & Pascual-Leone, A. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced ‘virtual lesions’ of human parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 953–957 (2001).
pubmed: 11528429
doi: 10.1038/nn0901-953
Molenberghs, P., Vandenberghe, R. R. C., Mesulam, M. M. & Peeters, R. Remapping Attentional Priorities: Differential Contribution of Superior Parietal Lobule and Intraparietal Sulcus. Cereb. Cortex 17, 2703–2712 (2007).
pubmed: 17264251
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl179
Vandenberghe, R. & Gillebert, C. R. Parcellation of parietal cortex: Convergence between lesion-symptom mapping and mapping of the intact functioning brain. Behav. Brain Res. 199, 171–182 (2009).
pubmed: 19118580
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.005
Corbetta, M., Patel, G. & Shulman, G. L. The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind. (2008).
Shulman, G. L. et al. Interaction of Stimulus-driven reorienting and expectation in ventral and dorsal frontoparietal and basal Ganglia-cortical networks. J. Neurosci. 29, 4392–4407 (2009).
pubmed: 19357267
pmcid: 2743562
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5609-08.2009
Posner, M. I. Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32, 3–25 (1980).
pubmed: 7367577
doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231
Mengotti, P., Käsbauer, A. S., Fink, G. R. & Vossel, S. Lateralization, functional specialization, and dysfunction of attentional networks. Cortex 132, 206–222 (2020).
pubmed: 32998061
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.022
Ptak, R. & Schnider, A. The attention network of the human brain: Relating structural damage associated with spatial neglect to functional imaging correlates of spatial attention. Neuropsychologia 49, 3063–3070 (2011).
pubmed: 21787795
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.008
Huang, Y. Z., Edwards, M. J., Rounis, E., Bhatia, K. P. & Rothwell, J. C. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 45, 201–206 (2005).
pubmed: 15664172
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033
Giustiniani, A. et al. Effects of low-gamma tACS on primary motor cortex in implicit motor learning. Behav. Brain Res. 376, 112170 (2019).
Benussi, A. et al. Exposure to gamma tACS in Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover, pilot study. Brain Stimul. 14, 531–540 (2021).
pubmed: 33762220
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.03.007
Sridharan, D., Steinmetz, N. A., Moore, T. & Knudsen, E. I. Distinguishing bias from sensitivity effects in multialternative detection tasks. J. Vis. 14, 16 (2014).
pubmed: 25146574
pmcid: 4141865
doi: 10.1167/14.9.16
Sridharan, D., Steinmetz, N. A., Moore, T. & Knudsen, E. I. Does the superior colliculus control perceptual sensitivity or choice bias during attention? Evidence from a multialternative decision framework. J. Neurosci. 37, 480–511 (2017).
pubmed: 28100734
pmcid: 5242403
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4505-14.2017
Joliot, M. et al. AICHA: An atlas of intrinsic connectivity of homotopic areas. J. Neurosci. Methods 254, 46–59 (2015).
pubmed: 26213217
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.07.013
Goldsworthy, M. R., Pitcher, J. B. & Ridding, M. C. A comparison of two different continuous theta burst stimulation paradigms applied to the human primary motor cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 123, 2256–2263 (2012).
pubmed: 22633917
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.05.001
Hubl, D. et al. Time course of blood oxygenation level–dependent signal response after theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation of the frontal eye field. Neuroscience 151, 921–928 (2008).
pubmed: 18160225
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.10.049
Sagar, V., Sengupta, R. & Sridharan, D. Dissociable sensitivity and bias mechanisms mediate behavioral effects of exogenous attention. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42759-w
Love, J. et al. JASP: Graphical statistical software for common statistical designs. J. Stat. Softw. 88, 1–17 (2019).
Helfrich, R. F. et al. Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Curr. Biol. 24, 333–339 (2014).
pubmed: 24461998
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.041
Neuling, T., Rach, S. & Herrmann, C. Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 161 (2013).
pubmed: 23641206
pmcid: 3639376
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00161
Kasten, F. H., Dowsett, J. & Herrmann, C. S. Sustained aftereffect of α-tACS lasts up to 70 min after stimulation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 245 (2016).
Helfrich, R. F. et al. Selective Modulation of Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity by HD-tACS Shapes Perception. PLoS Biol. 12, e1002031 (2014).
Shadlen, M. N. & Newsome, W. T. Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (Area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 1916–1936 (2001).
pubmed: 11600651
doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1916
Cohen, M. R. & Maunsell, J. H. R. Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1594–1600 (2009).
pubmed: 19915566
pmcid: 2820564
doi: 10.1038/nn.2439
Steinmetz, N. A. & Moore, T. Eye Movement Preparation Modulates Neuronal Responses in Area V4 When Dissociated from Attentional Demands. Neuron 83, 496–506 (2014).
pubmed: 25033188
pmcid: 4130345
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.06.014
Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C. & Summerfield, C. Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3593–3598 (2012).
pubmed: 22331901
pmcid: 3295248
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120118109
Tarasi, L., di Pellegrino, G. & Romei, V. Are you an empiricist or a believer? Neural signatures of predictive strategies in humans. Prog. Neurobiol. 219, 102367 (2022).
Lovejoy, L. P. & Krauzlis, R. J. Changes in perceptual sensitivity related to spatial cues depends on subcortical activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Usa. 114, 6122–6126 (2017).
pubmed: 28533384
pmcid: 5468608
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609711114
Chinchani, A. M. et al. Tracking momentary fluctuations in human attention with a cognitive brain-machine interface. Commun. Biol. 5, 1–17 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04231-w
Opitz, A., Windhoff, M., Heidemann, R. M., Turner, R. & Thielscher, A. How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 58, 849–859 (2011).
pubmed: 21749927
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.069
Thielscher, A., Opitz, A. & Windhoff, M. Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 54, 234–243 (2011).
pubmed: 20682353
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.061
Datta, A. et al. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul. 2, 201–207 (2009).
pubmed: 20648973
pmcid: 2790295
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005
Laczó, B., Antal, A., Niebergall, R., Treue, S. & Paulus, W. Transcranial alternating stimulation in a high gamma frequency range applied over V1 improves contrast perception but does not modulate spatial attention. Brain Stimul. 5, 484–491 (2012).
pubmed: 21962982
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.08.008
Di Lazzaro, V. et al. Theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suppresses specific excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 565, 945–950 (2005).
pubmed: 15845575
pmcid: 1464561
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.087288
Huang, Y. Z., Chen, R. S., Rothwell, J. C. & Wen, H. Y. The after-effect of human theta burst stimulation is NMDA receptor dependent. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118, 1028–1032 (2007).
pubmed: 17368094
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.021
Rahnev, D. et al. Continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces resting state connectivity between visual areas. J. Neurophysiol. 110, 1811–1821 (2013).
pubmed: 23883858
doi: 10.1152/jn.00209.2013
Antal, A. & Paulus, W. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 317 (2013).
Krause, M. R., Vieira, P. G., Csorba, B. A., Pilly, P. K. & Pack, C. C. Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains single-neuron activity in the primate brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 116, 5747–5755 (2019).
pubmed: 30833389
pmcid: 6431188
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815958116
Zaehle, T., Rach, S. & Herrmann, C. S. Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Enhances Individual Alpha Activity in Human EEG. PLoS One 5, e13766 (2010).
Vossen, A., Gross, J. & Thut, G. Alpha power increase after transcranial alternating current stimulation at alpha frequency (a-tACS) reflects plastic changes rather than entrainment. Brain Stimul. 8, 499–508 (2015).
pubmed: 25648377
pmcid: 4464304
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.12.004
Guerra, A. et al. Boosting the LTP-like plasticity effect of intermittent theta-burst stimulation using gamma transcranial alternating current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 11, 734–742 (2018).
pubmed: 29615367
pmcid: 6022811
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.03.015
Moliadze, V., Atalay, D., Antal, A. & Paulus, W. Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities. Brain Stimul. 5, 505–511 (2012).
pubmed: 22445135
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004
Hopfinger, J. B., Parsons, J. & Fröhlich, F. Differential effects of 10-Hz and 40-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on endogenous versus exogenous attention. Cogn. Neurosci. 8, 102–111 (2017).
pubmed: 27297977
doi: 10.1080/17588928.2016.1194261
Hoy, K. E. et al. The effect of γ-tACS on working memory performance in healthy controls. Brain Cogn. 101, 51–56 (2015).
pubmed: 26580743
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.002
Pahor, A. & Jaušovec, N. The effects of theta and gamma tacs on working memory and electrophysiology. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 651 (2018).
Nowak, M. et al. Driving human motor cortical oscillations leads to behaviorally relevant changes in local GABAA inhibition: A tACS-TMS study. J. Neurosci. 37, 4481–4492 (2017).
pubmed: 28348136
pmcid: 5413186
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0098-17.2017
Rufener, K. S., Zaehle, T., Oechslin, M. S. & Meyer, M. 40 Hz-Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) selectively modulates speech perception. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 101, 18–24 (2016).
pubmed: 26779822
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.01.002
Kasten, F. H., Wendeln, T., Stecher, H. I. & Herrmann, C. S. Hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital–parietal α- versus γ-tACS on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–11 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68992-2
Van Kerkoerle, T. et al. Alpha and gamma oscillations characterize feedback and feedforward processing in monkey visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111, 14332–14341 (2014).
pubmed: 25205811
pmcid: 4210002
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402773111
Cardin, J. A. et al. Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses. Nature 459, 663–667 (2009).
pubmed: 19396156
pmcid: 3655711
doi: 10.1038/nature08002
Iaccarino, H. F. et al. Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature 540, 230–235 (2016).
pubmed: 27929004
pmcid: 5656389
doi: 10.1038/nature20587
Zhou, D. et al. Effects of 40 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cognitive functions of patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. amp; Psychiatry 93, 568 LP–568 70 (2022).
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326885
Indovina, I. & Macaluso, E. Occipital-parietal interactions during shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention: Trial-dependent changes of effective connectivity. Magn. Reson. Imaging 22, 1477–1486 (Elsevier Inc., 2004).
Gillebert, C. R. et al. Lesion evidence for the critical role of the intraparietal sulcus in spatial attention. Brain 134, 1694–1709 (2011).
pubmed: 21576110
doi: 10.1093/brain/awr085
Roy, L. B., Sparing, R., Fink, G. R. & Hesse, M. D. Modulation of attention functions by anodal tDCS on right PPC. Neuropsychologia 74, 96–107 (2015).
pubmed: 25721567
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.028
Porciello, G., Crostella, F., Liuzza, M. T., Valentini, E. & Aglioti, S. M. rTMS-induced virtual lesion of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) alters the control of reflexive shifts of social attention triggered by pointing hands. Neuropsychologia 59, 148–156 (2014).
pubmed: 24813151
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.017
Kalla, R., Muggleton, N. G., Juan, C.-H. H., Cowey, A. & Walsh, V. The timing of the involvement of the frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex in visual search. Neuroreport 19, 1069–1073 (2008).
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328304d9c4
Vossel, S., Thiel, C. M. & Fink, G. R. Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex. Neuroimage 32, 1257–1264 (2006).
pubmed: 16846742
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.019
Ruff, C. C. et al. Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: Evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. Cereb. Cortex 18, 817–827 (2008).
pubmed: 17652468
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm128
Bergmann, T. O., Karabanov, A., Hartwigsen, G., Thielscher, A. & Siebner, H. R. Combining non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiology: Current approaches and future perspectives. Neuroimage 140, 4–19 (2016).
pubmed: 26883069
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.012
Mesulam, M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann. Neurol. 10, 309–25 (1981).
Vuilleumier, P. & Landis, T. Illusory contours and spatial neglect. Neuroreport 9, 2481–2484 (1998).
pubmed: 9721918
doi: 10.1097/00001756-199808030-00010
Vuilleumier, P. & Rafal, R. ‘Both’ means more than ‘two’: localizing and counting in patients with visuospatial neglect. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 783–784 (1999).
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., Mcavoy, M. P. & Shulman, G. L. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 3, 292–297 (2000).
Capotosto, P. et al. Anatomical segregation of visual selection mechanisms in human parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 33, 6225–6229 (2013).
pubmed: 23554503
pmcid: 3646236
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4983-12.2013
Vandenberghe, R. & Gillebert, C. R. Dissociations between spatial-attentional processes within parietal cortex: Insights from hybrid spatial cueing and change detection paradigms. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 1–11 (2013).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00366
Kiani, R. & Shadlen, M. N. Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. Science 324, 759–764 (2009).
pubmed: 19423820
pmcid: 2738936
doi: 10.1126/science.1169405
Hwang, E. J., Dahlen, J. E., Mukundan, M. & Komiyama, T. History-based action selection bias in posterior parietal cortex. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–14 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01356-z
Hanks, T. D., Ditterich, J. & Shadlen, M. N. Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 682–689 (2006).
pubmed: 16604069
pmcid: 2770004
doi: 10.1038/nn1683
Kay, K. N. & Yeatman, J. D. Bottom-up and top-down computations in word- and face-selective cortex. Elife 6, 1–29 (2017).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.22341
Silvanto, J., Muggleton, N., Lavie, N. & Walsh, V. The perceptual and functional consequences of parietal top-down modulation on the visual cortex. Cereb. Cortex 19, 327–330 (2009).
pubmed: 18515296
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn091
Iemi, L., Chaumon, M., Crouzet, S. M. & Busch, N. A. Spontaneous neural oscillations bias perception by modulating baseline excitability. J. Neurosci. 37, 807–819 (2017).
pubmed: 28123017
pmcid: 6597018
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1432-16.2016
Di Luzio, P., Tarasi, L., Silvanto, J., Avenanti, A. & Romei, V. Human perceptual and metacognitive decision-making rely on distinct brain networks. PLoS Biol. 20, 1–19 (2022).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001750
Katz, L. N., Yates, J. L., Pillow, J. W. & Huk, A. C. Dissociated functional significance of decision-related activity in the primate dorsal stream. Nature 535, 285–288 (2016).
pubmed: 27376476
pmcid: 4966283
doi: 10.1038/nature18617
Zhou, Y. & Freedman, D. J. Posterior parietal cortex plays a causal role in perceptual and categorical decisions. Science 365, 180–185 (2019).
pubmed: 31296771
pmcid: 7346736
doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8347
Sengupta, A., Banerjee, S., Ganesh, S., Grover, S. & Sridharan, D. The right posterior parietal cortex mediates spatial reorienting of attentional choice bias. figshare. Dataset. (2024) https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25125470 .
Boroojerdi, B. et al. Localization of the motor hand area using transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110, 699–704 (1999).
pubmed: 10378741
doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(98)00027-3
Villamar, M. F. et al. Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). J. Vis. Exp. 1–15 (2013) https://doi.org/10.3791/50309 .
Santarnecchi, E. et al. High-gamma oscillations in the motor cortex during visuo-motor coordination: A tACS interferential study. Brain Res. Bull. 131, 47–54 (2017).
pubmed: 28322886
doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.03.006
Gutteling, T. P., Sillekens, L., Lavie, N. & Jensen, O. Alpha oscillations reflect suppression of distractors with increased perceptual load. Prog. Neurobiol. 214, 102285 (2022).
pubmed: 35533812
pmcid: 7615060
doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102285
Mizuhara, H. & Yamaguchi, Y. Human cortical circuits for central executive function emerge by theta phase synchronization. Neuroimage 36, 232–244 (2007).
pubmed: 17433880
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.026
Zaghi, S. et al. Inhibition of motor cortex excitability with 15Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Neurosci. Lett. 479, 211–214 (2010).
pubmed: 20553804
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.060
Green, D. M. & Swets, J. A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. (John Wiley and Sons, 1966).
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L. & Kuang, D. Quick and Easy Implementation of the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure for Controlling the False Positive Rate in Multiple Comparisons. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 27, 77–83 (2002).
doi: 10.3102/10769986027001077
Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Analytical Biochemistry vol. 11 (1988).
Schönbrodt, F. D. & Wagenmakers, E. J. Bayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 128–142 (2018).
pubmed: 28251595
doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D. & Iverson, G. Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 225–237 (2009).
pubmed: 19293088
doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
Vrieze, S. I. Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychol. Methods 17, 228–243 (2012).
pubmed: 22309957
pmcid: 3366160
doi: 10.1037/a0027127