Psychosocial Stressors at Work and Atrial Fibrillation Incidence: An 18-Year Prospective Study.

atrial fibrillation heart disease risk factors occupational epidemiology psychosocial stressors workplace

Journal

Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 14 8 2024
pubmed: 14 8 2024
entrez: 14 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Psychosocial stressors at work, defined by the job strain and effort-reward imbalance at work (ERI) models, were shown to increase coronary heart disease risk. No previous study has examined the adverse effect of psychosocial stressors at work from both models on atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence. The objective of this study was to examine the separate and combined effect of psychosocial stressors at work from the job strain and ERI models on AF incidence in a prospective cohort study. A total of 5926 white-collar workers (3021 women and 2905 men) free of cardiovascular disease at baseline were followed for an average of 18 years. Job strain (high psychological demands combined with low decision latitude) and ERI were assessed using validated instruments. AF events were identified in medical databases with universal coverage. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated using Cox regression models, controlling for socioeconomic characteristics and lifestyle-related and clinical risk factors. A total of 186 AF incident events were identified over 18 years. Workers exposed to job strain (HR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.14-2.92]) and ERI (HR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.05-1.98]) had a higher risk of AF in fully adjusted models. Combined exposure to job strain and ERI was associated with a 2-fold AF risk increase (HR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.26-3.07]). Psychosocial stressors at work from the job strain and ERI models are associated with an increased risk of AF, separately and in combination. Workplace prevention strategies targeting these psychosocial stressors at work may be effective to reduce the burden associated with AF.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Psychosocial stressors at work, defined by the job strain and effort-reward imbalance at work (ERI) models, were shown to increase coronary heart disease risk. No previous study has examined the adverse effect of psychosocial stressors at work from both models on atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence. The objective of this study was to examine the separate and combined effect of psychosocial stressors at work from the job strain and ERI models on AF incidence in a prospective cohort study.
METHODS AND RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 5926 white-collar workers (3021 women and 2905 men) free of cardiovascular disease at baseline were followed for an average of 18 years. Job strain (high psychological demands combined with low decision latitude) and ERI were assessed using validated instruments. AF events were identified in medical databases with universal coverage. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated using Cox regression models, controlling for socioeconomic characteristics and lifestyle-related and clinical risk factors. A total of 186 AF incident events were identified over 18 years. Workers exposed to job strain (HR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.14-2.92]) and ERI (HR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.05-1.98]) had a higher risk of AF in fully adjusted models. Combined exposure to job strain and ERI was associated with a 2-fold AF risk increase (HR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.26-3.07]).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Psychosocial stressors at work from the job strain and ERI models are associated with an increased risk of AF, separately and in combination. Workplace prevention strategies targeting these psychosocial stressors at work may be effective to reduce the burden associated with AF.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39140284
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032414
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e032414

Auteurs

Edwige Tiwa Diffo (E)

Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit CHU de Québec-Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.
Departement of Social and Preventive Medicine Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.

Mathilde Lavigne-Robichaud (M)

Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit CHU de Québec-Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.
Departement of Social and Preventive Medicine Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.

Alain Milot (A)

Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit CHU de Québec-Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.
Department of Medicine Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.

Chantal Brisson (C)

Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit CHU de Québec-Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.
Departement of Social and Preventive Medicine Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.

Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet (M)

Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit CHU de Québec-Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.
Department of Health Science Université du Québec à Rimouski Lévis Canada.
Canada Research Chair in Sex and Gender in Occupational Health Lévis Canada.

Michel Vézina (M)

Departement of Social and Preventive Medicine Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.

Denis Talbot (D)

Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit CHU de Québec-Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.
Departement of Social and Preventive Medicine Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.

Xavier Trudel (X)

Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit CHU de Québec-Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.
Departement of Social and Preventive Medicine Laval University Quebec City Quebec Canada.

Classifications MeSH